Tying Employee Performance to Compensation in a High Involvement Organization

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Tying Employee Performance to Compensation in a High Involvement Organization

Description:

The purpose of this informal presentation ?that I have given to staff at the ... A Bachelor of Arts in Industrial Relations from Iberian American University ... –

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: billm55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tying Employee Performance to Compensation in a High Involvement Organization


1
Tying Employee Performance to Compensation in a
High Involvement Organization
  • Bill Markis
  • billmarkis_at_hotmail.com

2
Introduction
  • The purpose of this informal presentation ?that I
    have given to staff at the International Maize
    and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and to
    Human Resources students at Cal Poly Pomona? is
    to show an example of the work that I have been
    doing in Compensation
  • Please let me introduce myself

3
Who is Bill Markis?
  • Several years experience as Director/Manager of
    Human Resources
  • A Bachelor of Arts in Industrial Relations from
    Iberian American University
  • A Master of Business Administration from
    Pepperdine University
  • Certification as a Senior Professional in Human
    Resources

4
Objective of Performance Management
  • To communicate with employees and provide them
    specific feedback on performance
  • To avoid Social Loafing the tendency of
    individuals to slack when work is shared and
    individual performance is not assessed.(¹)

5
Traditional Approach
  • Employees were forced to endure a once-a-year
    paperwork exercise of performance appraisals
  • Not very effective
  • Dreaded by employees and managers alike

6
Traditional Appraisal Factors
  • Employees and managers were evaluated on traits
    such as
  • Dependability
  • Punctuality
  • Loyalty
  • not on their accomplishments

7
Traditional Appraisal was Dysfunctional
  • There was, at the most, only a vague connection
    between the appraisal content and the work
    results that were needed by the organization to
    be successful

8
The New Approach
  • Personality trait rating forms have been replaced
    with more objective measures of performance
    focusing on job-related outcomes and behaviors
  • Employees and supervisors jointly list specific
    objectives to be accomplished during the
    appraisal period
  • Performance measurement levels (Meet and Exceed)
    are defined

9
Traditional versus New Measurement Systems
10
360 Degrees
  • Employees can receive appraisal feedback from
    their peers and subordinates as an adjunct to an
    appraisal from a manager or supervisor

11
Timing of review
  • Change the process from a paperwork exercise into
    an ongoing dialog where there will be no
    once-a-year surprises
  • From being a once-a-year event to an ongoing
    process, with short formal reviews every six
    months

12
Dynamic Process
  • Formal reviews are focused on a discussion of
    progress in
  • Meeting objectives
  • Plans for the following appraisal period

13
Objective Setting
  • Objectives should encompass
  • Plans for personal contribution to corporate or
    team objectives
  • Quality and production increase
  • Cost reduction
  • Improvement in safety customer service
  • Teamwork objectives
  • Learning and development objectives

14
What Drives Objective Setting
  • Objectives relate to personal accomplishments
    consistent with the objectives of the employees
    team or work group and are dictated by
  • Competitive requirements
  • Corporate strategy
  • Market conditions
  • Customer demands

15
Typical Types of Objectives
  • Managers and employees in the work group should
    develop objectives consistent with company
    strategy and customer needs
  • Quality measures
  • Financial measures
  • Timeliness measures
  • Productivity/efficiency

16
Employee Development
  • Performance management focuses on
  • Increasing an employees value to the team
  • Personal development
  • Employee development is an important part of the
    appraisal process
  • Improve an existing skill
  • Develop a new skill that brings value to the work
    group

17
Long-term Objective
  • A long-term objective shall be an expectation of
  • Best in class or world class
  • Performance
  • Quality
  • Customer service
  • Flexibility
  • as called for by our companys strategy

18
Short-term Objective
  • Is an intermediate target that is better than
    current performance, but not necessarily as
    challenging as the long-term objective
  • It is challenging but attainable
  • It can be gradually made more difficult over
    time, thus establishing a pattern of continuous
    measurable improvement toward the long-term
    objective, which itself becomes more challenging
    over time

19
Define Performance LevelsExceeds Expectations
  • Overall performance clearly and consistently
    meets most position requirements and exceeds many
  • Compared with others performing the position,
    this performance level clearly exceeds that of
    others among the better performances for this
    performance period

20
Define Performance LevelsMeets Expectations
  • Performance accomplished by a competent employee
    who is experienced and fully trained to perform
    the position
  • Effective performance indicates that position
    requirements are consistently met and some
    occasionally exceeded

21
Define Performance LevelsBelow Expectations
  • Performance has continually failed to meet the
    minimum acceptance standards of the position for
    which the person was hired
  • Performance is not fully proficient and is below
    expectations that are normally achieved by a
    proficient employee

22
Sample Objectives forAdministrative Assistant
23
Sample Objectives for Human Resources
24
Motivation
  • Objective setting in the organization has an
    important influence in employee motivation
  • Specific and difficult objectives lead to higher
    employee performance provided those who had to
    attain them accepted the objectives

25
Employee Participation
  • The degree of employees acceptance of objectives
    is a function of
  • Their level of participation in setting
    objectives
  • The extent to which they perceive that the final
    objectives are attainable

26
Reinforcement
  • Employee behavior is strongly influenced by the
    consequences of that behavior
  • Positive behavior that is inspired and reinforced
    is more likely to reoccur
  • Reinforce approximations of the final desired
    behavior or result of that behavior

27
Relationship of Reinforcement to Objective Setting
  • The motivational impact of objectives comes from
    employees anticipation that they will be
    reinforced for attaining an objective

28
Self-fulfilling Prophecy
  • Objective attainment itself is reinforcing since
    it enhances an employees sense of accomplishment
    and self-worth
  • If the objective is too difficult, employees will
    not try to attain it or they will become
    frustrated with trying to attain it and stop
    trying

29
Link Performance to Pay
30
References
  • Workplace 2000, The Revolution Reshaping
    American Business from Joseph H. Boyett and
    Henry P. Conn, Dutton, 1991
  • Performance Now! software, by Knowledge Point
  • (¹) Julia Whitty, writer for Mother Jones
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com