Title: California Department of Transportation
1California Department of Transportation
- 2004 AASHTO National Transportation Civil Rights
Conference - September 7, 2004
- San Diego, California
2Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)
Goal-Setting on Federal Aid Highway Construction
Projects
- Workshop presented by
- Kris Kuhl - P.E.
- Chief, Office of Contract Awards
- Office Engineer
3Workshop Objectives
- Review California DOTs DBE goal setting
- basic process
- strengths and weaknesses
- Highlight other DOTs processes
- Determine Best Practices
- Use of Geographical Information Systems
4Goal Setting Process
- Authority to Set Contract Goals
- DBE 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 26.51
- Roles and Responsibilities
- From our annual DBE Program plan
- Office Engineer performs analysis of the contract
items DBE availability in making a goal
recommendation - Civil Rights reviews OEs recommendation and sets
the contract goal
5Process Overview
- For projects with any federal aid
- Office Engineer reviews contract items and
- determines work likely performed by prime
- reviews remaining items for subcontractor work
- applies DBE match list against these items
- counts items with significant DBE matches toward
the goal - applies factors to these items
- calculates rough goal by dividing DBE by total
estimate - rounds this percentage to the nearest whole
percent
6DBE Match List
- To match DBEs to an item of work, the DBE must
be - Certified as a DBE to do the item of work
- Ready, willing and able to perform the item of
work - Interested in doing the work in the project area
or work statewide - An item will not count toward the goal if
- there are a low number of DBE matches (lt10)
- the item of work is lt2000 (if not combinable
with similar work)
7Factors Other Considerations
- 100 of the item estimate is counted unless
- item involves supply of material, apply 12
factor - item involves trucking, apply 10 factor
- item is for portable CMS, apply 50 factor for
rental - A goal of 0 is possible when
- the amount of subcontractable work is negligible
- the number of DBE matches is minimal
8Step 1 - Identify Controlling Items
9Step 2- Review Potential Subcontractable Items
10Step 3 - Apply DBE Match List
11Step 4 - Count significantly matched items
towards goal
12Step 5 - Apply DBE Factors
EQ. Rental
Trucking
Supply
Supply
Trucking
Trucking
Supply
13Step 6 - Calculate Rough Goal by Dividing DBE
by Total
14Step 7 - Round to Nearest Whole Percent
Proposed Goal is 12
15Strengths Weaknesses of the Goal Setting Process
- Strengths
- useful for most projects
- repeatable
- rational
- Weaknesses
- relies on DBEs geographic preference
- goal is set well before bid opening and wont
reflect addenda or changes in DBE availability - assumes DBEs are ready, willing and able
- does not work well when the nature of the work is
specialized
16Summary of Project Goal SettingPractices
Nationwide
- Caltrans conducted telephone interviews of 48
state DOTs - Contractor Prequalification
- Bidders Lists
- Level of Annual Goal
- Size of local DBE pool
- Level of work required by the prime
- Race Neutral Measures
- Use of Codes
- Project Goal Setting
17Results of Survey
- Contractor Prequalification
- 7 states prequalify all contractors
- 29 states prequalify only the primes
- 12 states dont prequalify contractors (incl. CA)
- Bidders List
- 35 states have Bidders lists
- 29 states use the list to assist in goal setting
- Annual DBE Goals
- varies from 5 to 22.3 (Avg. 9.5)
18More Results
- Size of DBE Construction Contractor Pool
- 38 states indicated knowledge of DBE pool
- Percentage of Work Required by the Prime
- varies from 25 to 51 (avg. 41.9).
- 16 states use the 30 Federal level
- Race Neutral Measures
- 32 states use some race neutral measures
- 6 states use 100 race neutral measures
19Project Goal Setting Comparison
- Use of Standard Codes
- 23 use NAICS
- 20 use a state coding method (work categories)
- Project Goal Setting
- 39 states use the contract items
- 6 states dont set project goals
- 3 states use fixed goals
20Summary of Best Practices
- Effectiveness in achieving project goals
- Effectiveness in achieving annual goal
- Satisfaction with the process
21Use of Geographical Information Systems
22Geographic Information System
How can we answer the question, Where are DBEs
willing to work?
One method would be to determine DBE home office
proximity to the project location.
The following slides illustrate Caltrans efforts
to use GIS to assist in project goal setting
23DBE Stay Local Vs. Go Statewide
24Need for GIS in Goal Setting
- Problem
- About 67 - 73 of DBEs say that they are willing
to work statewide, but in reality only 30
actually work statewide - Existing DBE match system relies on certification
information - Using 75 mile radius in urban areas and 125 mile
radius in rural areas catches about 72 of DBEs
25Urban vs. Rural Area Comparison
26DBE/GIS Process Overview
- Select DBE at some distance (75 Miles for urban
and 125 miles for rural ) of project site - Match DBEs with license required for each item
- Combine GIS result with DBE match
27Match DBE with License
Project
Items (from 5 tables, estimate, Item code ,work
code,License, Naics)
GIS Selected DBE (from 4 tables, Calbe, Calpgm,
License, Nacis)
28GIS Match Results
29Factor GIS Result into DBE Match
30Questions, Comments Recommendations
Thank You!