Cash Flow Estimation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Cash Flow Estimation

Description:

It will be salvages after three years for zero dollars (which will also be its ... depreciated as macrs 3-year property and salvaged after three years (t=3) for an ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: drmik
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cash Flow Estimation


1
  • Chapter 12
  • Cash Flow Estimation
  • And Risk Analysis

2
  • Chapter 11 provides the various methods of
    analyzing project CFs, once the CFs are
    determined.
  • Chapter 12 backs up and shows us how to determine
    those CFs.
  • Project CFs are incremental CFs, defined as

3
  • A projects incremental CFs are divided into
    three segments
  • The following example involves the most common
    type of capital budgeting problem replacement

4
Replacement DecisionInfo on Old Machine
  • A machine purchased two years ago for 50,000 may
    be sold today for 20,000.
  • If kept, the machine will add 30,000 to annual
    sales and 12,000 to annual operating costs for
    each of the next three years of use.
  • It was being depreciated as macrs 3-year
    property. It will be salvages after three years
    for zero dollars (which will also be its book
    value at that time).
  • If kept, no additional w/c will be required.

5
Info on New Machine
  • The new equipment will cost 95,000 plus another
    5,000 for installation.
  • Additional working capital will be needed for
    increases in inventory (20,000), receivables
    (5,000) and accounts payable (15,000).
  • The new machine will add 130,000 to annual sales
    and 40,000 to annual operating costs for its 3
    years of use.
  • It will be depreciated as macrs 3-year property
    and salvaged after three years (t3) for an
    estimated 35,000.

6
Other Info
  • Additional earnings are taxed at a 40 rate.
  • The cost of capital for replacement decisions is
    15.
  • A marketing survey costing 10,000 was conducted
    to determine that the new equipments products
    would be well-received by consumers. The cost has
    been expensed for tax purposes.
  • Sales from the new project will not impact sales
    of other company products.

7
I. The Initial Investment Outlay
  • Which items will be part of the initial
    investment (CF0)?

8
II. Annual Operating CFs
  • What will be the pro forma income statements for
    each of the next 3 years?
  • What will be the incremental depreciation charges
    for each year?
  • How do we convert the project NI figures to CF
    figures?

9
III. Terminal CF
  • What is the after-tax salvage value for the old
    and new machines in year 3?
  • What is the difference in these salvage
    values?
  • What other CFs will occur in year 3?

10
CF Summary and Final Project Evaluation
  • What are the incremental cash flows for this
    project?
  • Should this project be accepted or rejected?

11
Worksheet Guidelines
  • Financing costs, such as interest expense and
    dividend payments, are omitted from the project
    CFs.
  • Financing costs are captured in the
    wacc.
  • The cost of the marketing survey is omitted from
    the project CFs as a sunk cost, because it occurs
    whether or not the project is accepted.

12
  • Project CFs are on an after-tax basis because
    taxes are a cash outflow that affect value, and
    this is consistent with the wacc
    construction.
  • Some CFs may be foregone if the project is
    accepted. These CFs are called opportunity costs
    and are shown as outflows in the worksheet.

13
  • Externalities, such as the impact of the new
    product on existing product sales, are called
    externalities, and are included in the project
    CFs.
  • Management options, such as abandonment, are
    included in the project CFs.

14
  • Project CFs could be expressed on a real
    (inflation omitted) or nominal (inflation
    included) basis, but it is much easier to express
    all CFs on a nominal basis. The wacc, by design,
    is expressed on a nominal basis.
  • To avoid bias, the project should not be
    evaluated by anyone with a vested interest in the
    projects acceptance.

15
TREATMENT OF RISKSensitivity Analysis
  • Sensitivity analysis involves changing each
    variable, one at a time, to its worst-case value
    and observing the effect on the projects
    NPV.
  • Sensitivity analysis requires that spreadsheets
    be constructed with formulas, so that all
    remaining values automatically recalculate when
    an input value is changed.

16
Scenario Analysis
  • Scenario analysis involves selecting a limited
    set of possible scenarios, estimating the
    probability of each scenario, then working with
    the CF values expected under each scenario.
  • By observing the final dispersion in npvs, the
    projects risk may be profiled.

17
  • What two scenarios are all companies considering
    this fall?

18
Simulation Analysis
  • Simulation analysis involves developing a
    probability distribution of values for each input
    variable, then (through computer iteration)
    generating a probability distribution for the
    project npv.
  • One common approach to simulation is the Monte
    Carlo method.

19
Probability Density
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x
?NPV
x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
0 E(NPV) NPV
20
  • A unique difficulty with simulation is capturing
    the interdependence of each input variables
    probability distribution.
  • For example, it the selling price is higher due
    to a stronger economy, the cost of labor and
    materials will also likely be higher.

21
Using the CAPM
  • Another approach to risk analysis in capital
    budgeting is to use the CAPM to adjust the wacc
    for project risk
  • CF0 (1200) CF1-4 625
  • beta 2.00 rRF6 rM12
  • finance 40 debt / 60 equity
  • rd 10 tax rate 40

22
Weaknesses of Risk Treatments
  • Most of these techniques of treating risk in
    capital budgeting decisions only profile the
    project risk. They do not lead to a final
    accept-reject decision.

23
Levels of Measuring Risk
  • Most companies measure risk at the project level.
  • Measuring risk at the company level is too
    difficult to specify due to the many different
    inter-correlations.
  • Using the CAPM is an example of expressing the
    risk at the shareholder level.

24
  • Expressing risk at the project level gives an
    approximation of the risk at the company level,
    since most project CFs are highly correlated with
    the companys existing CFs.
  • Expressing risk at the project level gives an
    approximation of risk at the shareholder level
    since shareholder returns and project CFs will be
    highly correlated with the economy.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com