Title: SMC Specs
1SMCSpecs StandardsInitiative
Dave Davis Chief, Systems Engineering
Division SMC/EAE 310 653-1427 david.davis_at_losangel
es.af.mil
2Background
- Several Billion in Lost Assets During the
1990s/early 2000s - Reduced Government and Contractor Mission
Assurance - and engineering resources
- The 90s Saw a Number of Interrelated New
Directions for the Development of Space Systems - DoD Acquisition Reform
- Reduced reliance on specs/standards
- Deferred largely to commercial best practices
- NASA Faster, Better, Cheaper
- Commercial Best Practices
Acquisition Practices of the 1990s Were
Inherently Flawed
3Industry-Wide Technical Issues
- System Complexity, in an Absolute Sense,
Continues to Increase in Magnitude and Scope - Parts
- Hardware
- Software
- Interfaces
- Increased Complexity Also Results in
- More latent defects (increased late build-cycle
and orbital failures) - Greater test challenges related to changes in
technology, manufacturing and materials - Increasing electronic part or device complexity
(e.g., ASIC, FPGA) - Increased use and complexity of software
- System design and sub-system complexity
- Ability and willingness to test like you fly
Satellites Today Face a Greater Challenge to
Verify Full Performance and Screen for Defects
Prior to Launch
4Specs Standards Initiative
- Apply specs standards as element of acquisition
practices and toolset - Define technical practices and expectations by
government - Define the what and not the how to
- Establish Select list of space systems
standards - Establish baseline set of common specs and
standards - Include military and industry (e.g., AIAA, ISO)
standards - Establish Organizational Policy
- Specify critical standards in RFP
- Compliance Documents
- Baseline contractually
5SMC SS Policy
- Issued by Lt.Gen. Hamel 11 July
- Establishes specifications and standards as an
integral element of SMC acquisition processes - Applies to all new development, acquisition and
sustainment contracts, including new contracts
for legacy programs - Contractual compliance through the supplier
chain, as appropriate - SMC Chief Engineer (CE) responsible for master
list of compliance documents - SPOs, with CE, generate tailored set of specs
and standards and recommend to PEO for
implementation - SMC/CC/AFPEO Space resolves issues
6SMC SS List
- Revised SMC SS List published 8/9/2007
- 65 essential documents
- Entire SMC System Portfolio
- Military, International, and Industry Standards,
and Aerospace TORs - Updated standards to reflect current best
practices - Additional updates to current document versions
7Standards Technical/Functional Areas
- Program Management
- Systems Engineering
- Risk Management
- Configuration Management
- Design Reviews
- Product Assurance
- Electrical Power
- Electrical Power, Batteries
- Electrical Power, Solar
- EMI / EMC
- Environmental Engineering
- Human Factors
- Interoperability
- Logistics
- Parts Management/Engr
- Ordnance
- Pressure Vessels
- Reliability
- Maintainability
- Manufacturing / Producibility
- Mass Properties
- Safety
- Security
- Software Development
- Structures
- Survivability
- Moving Mechanical Assemblies (MMAs)
- Test, Ground
- Test, Space
8National Security Space
Space Industrial Base Council
9Collaboration Across National Security Space
Ensuring Consistency
NSS Integration
SMC / NRO Collaboration
Space Industrial Base Council
Mission Assurance Integration Task Force
Co-Chaired by DoD EA Space DNRO
Co-Chaired by NRO DDSE SMC/EA
Bring Senior Level Attention to Space Industrial
Base Issues on a Recurring Basis and Bring
Forward Actionable Recommendations Across the
Full Range of Industrial Base Issues.
Identify and implement areas where a common SMC
/ NRO approach provides benefit.
Specs Stds Working Group
Specs Stds Working Group
- Ensure sound technical practices applied on NSS
programs and facilitate industrial supply base
consistent with requirements - Ensure NSS community takes a consistent approach
in the application of specs standards - SMC NSSO NRO Navy NASA MDA NOAA
- Establish a common set of preferred
specifications and standards - Aerospace representative on NRO Standards
Advisory Panel (NSAP)
10Industry Standards Completed
- 7 AIAA Standards recently issued under SMC effort
- Moving Mechanical Assemblies for Space and Launch
Vehicles, S-114-2005 - Criteria for Explosive Systems and Devices Used
on Space and Launch Vehicles, S-113-2005 - Qualification and Quality Requirements for
Space-Qualified Solar Cells, S-111-2005 - Qualification and Quality Requirements for
Space-Qualified Solar Panels, S-112-2005 - Space Systems-Structures Design and Test
Requirements, S-110-2005 - Mass Properties Controls for Space Systems,
S-120-2006 - Electrical Power Systems for Unmanned Spacecraft,
S-122-2007
11SMC / Contractor SS initiativesAFSO21
12SS Problem Statement
- No mutual understanding of contractor and SMC
Specs and Standards (SS) processes - Differing requirements from different SMC
customers - Contractor labor intensive efforts to correlate
command media (CM) to government SS - Difficulty in tracking changes in SS
- Persistent contractor push back on
implementation of SS - Lack of feedback on contractor comments on SS
13Objectives/Goals
- Review modify current processes
- Provide documented processes which facilitate
the development, modification, and implementation
of the SMC Compliance SS and Contractor command
media programs - Provide documented contractor processes which
facilitate understanding of relationship
(verifiability) of contractor command media and
SMC Compliance Standards - Improve both government and contractor SS
processes to facilitate achievement of program
operational requirements
14SS Scope
- Project Focused on SMC and Contractor Processes
- Process 1 Development and Modification of SS
- Process 2 Contractor Compliance with SS
- Process 3 Pre-award SS Tailoring Process
- Focused on Competitive Procurement versus Sole
Source
15Current State Flow
Spec Std Development and/or Modification
Process 1
Informal Collaborative SME Review
SQIC other industry reviews
Needs Analysis
Confirm Need
Create/Modify SS
Informal Review of SS
Formal Review Modify SS
Approve SS
Update SS List
Approve SS List
G
G
GI
GI
G
G
G
- Improve distribution methods
- Improve cross-correlation of changes made to the
SS list S
- SMC Industry Involvement
- Cross-Fertilize Lessons Learned
- Quick Turn Process
- Institute Framework/ process for
- Initiating change
- More disciplined infrastructure and
implementation process
- Industry Input in Approval Process
- List of approved Stds
- Improve distribution methods
Government Activity
G
Industry Activity
I
Potential improvement opportunities identified by
team
Process or mechanism to support identified step
16Current State Flow
SS Contractor Compliance Process 2
Process 1
Process 2
Informal Framework
Informal Framework
Doesnt exist in a formal way today
SMC provides SS
Industry compares Command Media to SS
SMC Industry Discussions on Comments
G
GI
I
- Formal Mapping of CM to SMC SS
- Assess if change to internal CM feasible
- SMC Industry SME collaboration
Process 3
Industry compares SS with Command Media for each
RFP (Process 3)
Industry proposes current command media meets
intent or agree to take exception to CM
Provide Comments on draft RFP (Process 3)
I
I
I
- Industry justifies CM or proposes alternate
approach
Government Activity
G
Industry Activity
I
Potential improvement opportunities identified by
team
Process or mechanism to support identified step
17Current State Flow
Pre-Contract Spec Std Tailoring Process 3
Process 1
- Standardized process for reviewing and
disposition comments
- Standardized process for providing and reviewing
comment
- Modifications of Specs included within RFP
- Minimal deviation from SS compliance
Y
Changes
Tailor list for Acquisition
Tailor individual S S for Specific Acquisition
Release Draft RFP
Provide Comments
Review Disposition Comments
G
I
GI
G
G
N
Receive Proposals Select Source
Negotiate SS Baseline
Execute Administer Contract
Review, Approve, Release Final RFP
Respond to RFP
G
I
G
GI
GI
- Process Std for dealing with Heritage, OTS
Legacy Hardware - Approved Alternate Approach Deviations
Solicitation Review Board
- Better understanding of Rqmts
- Minimal deviation from SS compliance
Government Activity
G
Industry Activity
I
Potential improvement opportunities identified by
team
Process or mechanism to support identified step
18Future State Flow
Spec Std Development and/or Modification
Process 1
Determine revision or new SS required
Receive recommendation for revisions or new SS
Start
Initiation of Change or Addition
1
G
GI
G
Create/Modify SS
Informal Review of SS
Formal Review Modify SS
Approve SS
Highlight Changes
Distribute updated SS
Confirm need determine scope through
collaborative review process
2
3
4
5
6
8
7
GI
G
GI
GI
G
G
GI
Provide access to published SS
Designates POC to represent organization ensure
two-way flow of information
Review SS for correlation to internal command
media
I
I
I
SMEs provide comments regarding SS / POC
provides feedback to Comment Originators
Update SS List
Approve SS List
Distribute updated SS list
9
10
11
Finish
I
G
G
G
Provide access to published SS
I
19Future State Flow
Contractor Compliance Process 2
Start
2
4
5
1
SMC Provides SS
SMC Comm. to Wings Contractor
Industry Maps CM to S/S
SMC Industry SMEs review CM mapping
SMC provides compliance assessment
3
Finish
G
GI
G
I
GI
Government Activity
G
Industry Activity
I
SS Process Improvement
Industry Auxiliary Process Improvement
Auxiliary Process Connections
-----
20Future State Flow
Pre-Contract Spec Std Tailoring Process 3
Receive SS comments from draft RFPs
Should address all changes to RFPs
G
Start
Tailor list for Acquisition
Tailor individual SS for Specific Acquisition
Release Draft RFP
Provide Comments
Review Disposition Comments
4
1
2
3
5
Highlight latest SS changes in RFP Revisions
6
G
G
G
I
GI
G
Receive contractor responses for Heritage and OTS
items
G
Provide Feedback to Comment Originators
I
Receive Proposals Select Source
Negotiate SS Baseline
Execute Administer Contract
Review, Approve, Release Final RFP
Respond to RFP
7
8
9
10
11
Finish
G
I
G
GI
GI
21Summary
- SS Infrastructure and Institutionalization on
both sides critical for success - Infrastructure
- Policies, organizational structure, roles
responsibilities - Institutionalization
- Disciplined implementation
- Minimize Waivers/Deviations
- Government must implement across all
programs.and acquisition agencies - Industry must implement across programs