Exceptional Teaching - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 86
About This Presentation
Title:

Exceptional Teaching

Description:

Demonstrate skill of basic soldering. Type of learning. Apply practical soldering skill. Demonstrate skill. Mastery through demonstration ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 87
Provided by: me6236
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Exceptional Teaching


1
Exceptional Teaching
  • Chapter 5
  • Assessing Learning

2
Purpose
  • To gain an understanding of assessment types and
    their uses
  • To develop a positive learning environment
  • To nurture self monitoring in students

3
Outcomes and Objectives
  • To define assessments and their functions
  • To summarize philosophy, theory, and strategy of
    learner assessments
  • To provide an understanding of the types of
    assessments, how and why assessments are selected

4
  • To understand the role of reliability and
    validity on delivering assessments
  • To discuss results and feedback as it relates to
    teaching and course improvement

5
  • Letter grades can motivate or shrink student
    interest, goals, and their willingness to learn

6
  • Assessments

7
AssessmentsWhat are they?
  • They are
  • Ways to determine what students have learned
  • Helpful in guiding your instruction
  • Indicate the effectiveness of your teaching

8
Assessments also
  • Include instructional strategies and criteria
    for their application that plays a large role in
    the facilitation of successful learning (Wiley,
    2000)

9
Why Assess?
  • Function
  • Philosophy

10
Function
  • Allow course planning for varied learner skill
    levels (placement, grouping, etc.)
  • Encourage motivation to effective learning
    strategies (feedback)

11
  • Allow self monitoring of individual progress
  • Evaluate the course plan
  • Implement overall course effectiveness
  • Meet accreditation requirements

12
Philosophy
  • Students are learners The ECPI Experience
  • Core Philosophy
  • Effective Assessments

13
Students are learners
  • ECPI is hands on instruction
  • Assessments are an integral part of the course
    design.

14
Assessment Core Philosophy
  • The core philosophy of assessments should be
  • Clear
  • Applied skills in and out of workplace situations
  • Consistent with course content in

15
Core philosophy should
  • Provide direct feedback to encourage learning
  • Emphasize intellectual, creative, and individual
    intelligence
  • Be planned at designated checkpoints throughout
    the course

16
  • Contribute to a positive learning environment
    that reduces anxiety
  • Allow students to demonstrate their
    accomplishments

17
(No Transcript)
18
  • Effective Assessments

19
  • Allow the learner to
  • Master the subject (recognize, relate, define,
    etc.) demonstrate knowledge
  • Understand information and translate into various
    context (express, identify, explain, etc)

20
  • Use methods, concepts and theories, problem solve
    (apply, demonstrate, operate, practice, etc.)
  • Recognize hidden meanings (appraise, analyze,
    compare contrast, etc.)

21
  • Generalize from given facts (assemble, collect,
    formulate, manage, organize, etc.)
  • Question (judge and explain) cues (select,
    support, estimate, predict, etc)
  • (Bloom, 1956)

22
  • Time to Participate
  • Effective Assessment Quiz
  • (Referred to as Traditional Cognitive Test)

23
  • True or False
  • 1) Effective assessments allow learners to
    evaluate course content
  • 2) Effective assessments discourage learners in
    generalizing learned material

24
  • 3) Learners should judge and question content
    cues
  • 4) Learners use a rule of thumb when new
    information is received and processed.
  • Note your reaction to the word quiz

25
  • Assessment Strategy

26
Assessment Strategies
  • Use challenging questions in the development of
    assessments and grading schemes

27
Examples of Challenge Questions
  • What will mastery of the content look?
  • What skills will be demonstrated?
  • Will I need a Pre/post assessment?

28
When should assessments be used
  • Midterm or Final Assessments?
  • Should they be comprehensive?
  • Will I need Interim Assessments?
  • How should they be expressed? Written, skill
    demonstration, or oral?

29
  • Types of Assessments

30
Types of Assessments
  • Traditional/Summative
  • Baseline/Formative
  • Performance Based
  • Self Assessment

31
  • Traditional/Summative
  • (Traditional Cognitive Test)

32
  • Traditional/Summative are
  • Selected and constructed
  • Multiple Choice
  • Fill in the blank
  • True/false
  • Short answer
  • Matching
  • labeling
  • (from test banks, text CDs, or instructor lead
    material)

33
Traditional/Summative Continued
  • Advantages
  • Provide a written grade with positive and
    negative feedback
  • Encourages understanding of content knowledge
  • Develops reinforcement of skills learned

34
  • Disadvantages
  • Can intimidate learners
  • Results may not accurately demonstrate level of
    learning

35
Further defined and UsesTraditional/Summative
  • Are comprehensive
  • Used to measure accumulation of knowledge.
    Example Test, quizzes
  • Provide accountability
  • Used to ensure objectives are met
  • Offers a summation of information
  • Used to pinpoint particular points throughout the
    course, such as entry, objectives learned, etc.

36
  • Baseline/Formative

37
Baseline/Formative are
  • Oral or Written, and based on prior knowledge
  • Essay, observation, interview
  • Research paper/journal/lab report
  • Story/play/poem (reading, performance)
  • Exhibit Video/audio
  • Spreadsheet/data base
  • Portfolio

38
Baseline/Formative Continued
  • Advantages
  • Encourages examination and communication of
    strengths
  • An opportunities for growth
  • Suggest improvements during the learning process,
    and
  • Allows learners to see their progress.

39
  • Disadvantages
  • Possibility of discouraging and hinder progress
    if students feel they are not doing well
  • Poor communication may prevent information from
    being relayed.

40
Further defined and UsesBaseline/Formative
  • Are immediate evidence of student learning
  • Used at the beginning and throughout the course
    to evaluate immediate learning. Example Research
    Papers or Oral questioning
  • Provides a measure of quality of student learning
    and instructional methods
  • For example Pre and Post Test
  • Offers an opportunity to review and change

41
  • Performance-Based

42
Performance-Based
  • Represent a set of strategies that support
  • Knowledge application
  • Skills
  • Work habits

43
Performance-Based Continued
  • Provides information on how the information is
    perceived and understood by the student
  • Offers the opportunity to integrate instruction
    and learning (scaffolding)

44
Performance-Based Continued
  • Emphasize real life concerns
  • Enactment of learned material
  • Role play possible solutions
  • Integrate new knowledge with experience
  • Practical use
  • Offers hands on experience

45
Performance Based (example)
  • Using an objective
  • Demonstrate skill of basic soldering
  • Type of learning
  • Apply practical soldering skill
  • Demonstrate skill
  • Mastery through demonstration
  • Level of demonstration
  • Skill levels divided into four sections
  • Grading
  • Equal grading in divided sections
  • Feedback
  • Immediate and based on learning styles

46
Performance Based
  • Advantages
  • encourages individual thinking,
  • Provide an opportunity for student to instructor
    and instructor to student question/answer
    interaction

47
  • Disadvantage
  • knowledge drives motivation, if the learner lacks
    knowledge, they may be less likely to participate

48
  • Self assessment-performance assessment
  • Scaffolding (layering instructor knowledge with
    student knowledge and experience) encourages
    students to apply strategies
  • Games such as Jeopardy, brain teasers, flash
    cards, or exploring the environment allow
    students to assess what they have learned

49
  • Oral questioning, observation of task, or
    thinking out loud are all methods of performance
    and processed focused assessments
  • One minute write-ups on a specific topic
  • Post challenges on an index card and drop into a
    bowl (or post on the board) for discussion

50
Assessment Selection considerations
  • Purpose
  • What do I want to know?
  • Type of learning
  • Function, application, skills?
  • Appropriateness
  • To demonstrate mastering content
  • Feasibility
  • Time for assessment
  • Grading
  • Scoring, Rubric
  • Use of results
  • Possible feedback
  • Demonstration
  • based on individual learning styles

51
  • Blending
  • Assessments

52
  • Combining approaches (traditional, performance,
    self-assessment)
  • may be a better selection depending on the
    desired outcome.
  • Students can demonstrate learning in ways that
    complement their learning styles in recalling
    facts and performance levels

53
Blending assessments Continued
  • Students can recall facts and demonstrate levels
    (p.164)
  • Lab type assessments allow students to interpret
    drug labels, dosage and dispense
  • Identify potential problems
  • Test related information and problem solve

54
  • Time to
  • Participate

55
Personal Communication
  • Think of a story in the headline news (select a
    timeframe, example over the past week, what have
    you noticed in the news)
  • Write for one minute on how that story affects
    your area of study
  • After 1 minute, put papers aside for a future
    activity/assignment

56
Activity ClosureSave for future activity
  • Group Discussion
  • Headline selected
  • Why it was chosen
  • How does the selected headline effects your area
    of study
  • Purpose
  • Show a relationship between real life situations
    and area of study
  • Outcome
  • Based on the group discussion, determine the
    importance of the subjects discussed in the group
    discussions

57
  • Academic
  • Achievement

58
Academic Achievement
  • Reflects competency in
  • Technical skills and communication
  • Thinking and problem solving skills
  • Subject matter, skills, and concepts (p. 165)
  • Focus is on desired outcomes for graded and
    non-graded assessments.

59
Desired Outcome
  • Competency of
  • Subject Matter Skills
  • Higher order thinking
  • Problem-solving skills
  • Communication
  • Technical Skills

60
Grading
  • Weighing the grade
  • Building a Rubric

61
Grading
  • Academic based on course content
  • Nonacademic based on related content, such as
    attendance, participation, professionalism

62
  • Determine if a baseline assessment be used to
    measure a successful outcome?
  • What is the relationship between the students
    total assessment and their performance?
  • Are traditional assessments
  • more important than
  • performance?

63
  • Provide a percentage for each assessment
  • Totaling 100
  • For example
  • Four (4) quizzes (10 each)
  • Dropping the lowest score
  • Midterm (20)
  • Project (25)
  • Final Exam (25)
  • Equals 100, while applying various weights to
    assessments (depending on the relevance of
    importance of the content)

64
Building a Rubric
  • Review learning objectives
  • Keep a simple plan
  • Focus on student expression of content knowledge
  • Each item in the rubric should report on a
    different skill
  • Evaluate measurable criteria

65
  • Time to Participate

66
  • Review Personal communication activity

67
  • Based on level of relative importance, grading
    should be weighed to reflect student performance
    in each category, for an overall evaluation
  • Refer to page 166 for weighting scores
  • Review Activity

68
Review Personal Communication
  • You were asked to write for one minute on an
    article in the headlines
  • Discuss why it was chosen, and
  • Determine how it related to your area of study
  • If the overall unit is 50 points
  • Give a percentage or weight to each topic
    discussed based on their importance to the area
    of study

69
Rubric Pause/Participate
  • Develop a rubric for the one minute writing on
    the story in the news (Time to Participate
    activity)

70
Rubric Example
  • Look at the summary of the headline article
  • As a Beginning level, what percentage would you
    award the writing?
  • Include concepts related to the course in their
    writing as Developmental, what would be the
    percentage?

71
  • Provide an example of how the article relates to
    the course content
  • Demonstrates Accomplishment, what is the
    percentage?

72
  • Activity

73
Weight Scores
  • Use your syllabus
  • Review the activities listed
  • How are they weighted
  • Why do they carry the weight assigned
  • Could their weight be distributed differently
  • Are there graded and non-graded assessments
  • Are the methods of assessments blended throughout
    the course

74
Competency
  • Looking at knowledge, skills, and abilities
    through
  • On demand activities
  • Self assessments
  • Short answers

75
Development
  • Reliability and Validity
  • Steps
  • Examples

76
Assessments should be
  • Valid
  • Face Validity measures what it should
  • Content Validity balanced with regard to
    important material
  • Criterion/Concurrent validity consistent with
    others performance ? (p. 159)
  • Reliable
  • Scores consistently and objectively (p. 159)

77
Steps to reliability and validity
  • Define in writing what you expect from the
    learner
  • Define task learners will come across in the
    class and in the workforce leading to the use of
    problem solving skills
  • Use a predetermined rubric to evaluate performance

78
Types of valid and reliable Test
  • Assessments are consistent
  • Such as
  • performing venipuncture and capillarilary
    punctures
  • Pre/post test
  • Web based in Exam View
  • Pre-constructed question and answers provided by
    established test banks

79
Resources for Assessments
  • Established test within ECPI are reflective of
    the course objectives (traditional cognitive
    Assessments)
  • Pre/Post test
  • Midterm Exams
  • Final Exams
  • Quizzes
  • Instructor prepared test discuss content covered
    throughout the course
  • Hands on demonstration
  • Interaction through presentations
  • Questions similar to class instruction

80
  • Text and computer based test are ready to use but
    may differ in words and presentation form the
    instructor
  • Although they are ready to use, they may not
    cover the course objectives and do not include
    online or in class discussion information
  • Internet
  • Provides more tools for different learning styles
  • May use publishers tools provided with the text

81
Student Feedback from Assessments
  • Determine how the information is received by the
    student
  • Provides instructor knowledge
  • Evaluates speaking skills of the instructor
  • Establish the effectiveness of course content and
    delivery

82
Course effectiveness Results and Faculty feedback
  • Positive approach to helping students succeed
  • Diagnose problematic areas and identify room for
    improvement based on student performance
  • Review student and peer evaluations

83
What did you learn
  • Through the use of three types of assessments
    (Traditional (quiz), Personal Communication (one
    minute write up), and Rubric development, you are
    able to
  • Relate to your learners and their reactions to
    various assessment methods
  • Utilize objectivity in the assessment process
  • Recognize the function of assessment types
  • Summarize philosophy, theory, and strategy of
    learner assessments

84
  • Understand the types of assessments, how they are
    used, and how they are selected
  • Understand the importance of reliability and
    validity
  • Employ three steps to develop reliable and valid
    test
  • Apply assessment results and feedback as it
    relates to teaching and course improvement

85
Questions
  • Comments
  • Concerns

86
References
  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational
    objectives, handbook 1 Cognitive domain. New
    York Longmans Green.
  • Brown, S.F., Cox, B.G., Mitchell, W.M., Kaliski,
    B.S., Anderson, L., Beller, L., Nyhan, P.,
    Wallner, R., Hudoba, T., Fulton, N. (2006).
    Exceptional Teaching Ideas in action. St. Paul
    EMC Paradigm Publishing p 152-186.
  • Wiley, D. A. (2000). Learning object design and
    sequencing theory. Unpublished doctoral
    dissertation, Brigham Young University. Retrieved
    June 8, 2006 from http//davidwiley.com/papers/dis
    sertation/dissertation.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com