Challenges of Bridge Cable Modelling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Challenges of Bridge Cable Modelling

Description:

Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse 1941 ... John Owen. Wind tunnel experiments. Cable Modelling Applications. Cable Aeroelastic Behaviour ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: HPM5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Challenges of Bridge Cable Modelling


1
Challenges of Bridge Cable Modelling
  • Neil Botterill
  • PhD Student, School of Civil Engineering
  • January 2006

2
Background
3
Motivation
  • Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse 1941
  • University of Nottingham pursuing a body of work
    based around the Kessock Bridge using mostly CFD

4
Work done so far
  • Bridge Deck CFD models Dongke Sun, Phrain Gu
  • Cable CFD modelsKai Fan Liaw, Neil Botterill
  • Field measurementsJohn Owen
  • Wind tunnel experiments

5
Cable Modelling Applications
6
Cable Aeroelastic Behaviour
  • Vortex Induced Vibration
  • Galloping
  • Buffeting
  • Rain-Wind Vibration
  • Can the above be reproduced in CFD models?

7
Major Considerations
  • Structural problem as well as a fluid problem
  • Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) coupling
    procedure
  • Meshing strategy
  • Turbulence model

8
Meshing Strategy
  • Usually Eulerian mesh is used
  • Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) formulation
    used to account for movement of bluff object

9
Turbulence
  • What effects are important to capture?
  • Zdravkovich proposes the categories
  • Laminar
  • Transition in Wake
  • Transition in Shear Layers
  • Transition in Boundary Layers
  • Full Turbulence
  • Drag Crisis is important

10
Drag Crisis
  • Significant drop in drag in a range of Reynolds
    numbers easily achievable in the real world
  • Nobody has successfully modelled this yet
    although some have come close (Wang et al. 2001)
  • What turbulence model is suitable for this?

11
Large Eddy Simulation
  • LES calculates large eddies (turbulence)
  • LES only uses a turbulence model for the smallest
    eddies
  • Separation is achieved by filter function
  • Usually grid based so this introduces extra
    considerations for meshing
  • Large resource requirements

12
LES Work done so far
Reynolds Number Grid Size (no. of nodes) Number of parallel clusters Wall clock time (per 60s of solution time)
16x103 1,533,525 6 7.95 days
32x103 1,533,525 12 7.09 days
64x103 2,224,323 12 17.22 days
128x103 2,238,816 10 21.37 days
13
Drag crisis the story so far
14
Summary of Goals / Challenges
  • Continue pursuit of Drag Crisis
  • Develop a suitable FSI coupling procedure
  • Adopt a suitable meshing strategy for large
    motion
  • Extend 2d work on circular cylinders to a 3d
    cable
  • Parametric study

15
Thank You For Listening
  • Neil.Botterill_at_nottingham.ac.uk
  • January 2006
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com