Principles of financial economics in insurance pricing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Principles of financial economics in insurance pricing

Description:

Pricing formula then becomes. P = St E[mt Xt] = St E[Xt] / RXt. where ... Premium is present value of claims at risk-adjusted rate. No profit margin ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Katr156
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Principles of financial economics in insurance pricing


1
(No Transcript)
2
Principles of financial economics in insurance
pricing
  • Greg Taylor
  • Taylor Fry Consulting Actuaries
  • University of Melbourne
  • University of New South Wales

3
Insurance contracts and premiums
  • Insurance contact
  • Provides indemnity against an uncertain cost X
  • Premium
  • The certain consideration to be paid for this
    contract

swap Certain cost P Uncertain cost X
4
Evaluating the premium
  • Equivalent to evaluating the market price P of
    the swap
  • Characteristics of the cash flows to be priced
  • Uncertain
  • Distributed over time

5
Financial economics
  • Financial economics tells us how to calculate the
    value of such cash flows
  • value market value in a competitive market
    fair value

P St Emt Xt where Xt cash flow at time
t mt stochastic discount factor applicable to
time t - depends on state of the economy
6
Premium and profit margin
  • Expenses and taxes ignored for the moment
  • P St Emt Xt
  • Market price is expected value of discounted
    losses
  • There is no additional profit margin

7
Stochastic discount factors
  • Assume
  • Individuals are risk-averse expected utility
    maximisers
  • No arbitrage possibilities
  • Basic properties of factors (Sherris, 2003)

Emt 1/RFt RFt is risk free discount
factor Emt Xt EXt / RFt covmt , Xt
8
Pricing with stochastic discount factors
  • Emt Xt EXt / RFt covmt , Xt
  • P St Emt Xt Expected losses
  • discounted risk free
  • covariance term (ve or ve)
  • Last term is covariance between losses and some
    broader economic variable
  • Nature of that variable will depend on the
    particular model of the economy chosen

9
CAPM
  • One model of economy is CAPM
  • Could choose others (but need to say which)
  • Pricing formula then becomes
  • P St Emt Xt St EXt / RXt
  • where
  • RXt risk adjusted t-period accumulation factor
    associated with Xt ?s1t (1 rXs)
  • rXs rFs ßX ErMs rFs
  • rFs risk free ROR
  • rMs share market ROR
  • ßX covX , rM / EX VrM single period

10
Diversifiable and undiversifiable risk
  • Risk adjusted ROR
  • rX rF ßX ErM rF single period
  • For single period
  • X / EmX 1 rF ßX rM rF e
  • where
  • cove , rM 0
  • risk free undiversifiable risk
    diversifiable risk
  • Only undiversifiable risk taken into account in
    pricing

11
Diversifiable and undiversifiable risk
  • rXs rFs ßX ErMs rFs
  • ßX covX , rM / EX VrM
  • Risk adjusted RORs depend on correlation of
    losses with economic wealth (share market
    capitalisation as a proxy)
  • Price will be higher (lower) than risk free
    discounted if
  • ßX lt (gt)0
  • i.e. losses tend to be heavy when economy
    depressed (buoyant)
  • How often does this occur?

12
Profit margin example
  • Hypothetical insurer over single period
  • Start of period
  • Raises equity
  • Underwrites and receives premium
  • Invests premium risk free, invests equity in
    share index
  • No taxes or expenses
  • End of period
  • Receives investment return
  • Pays claims
  • Distributes remaining funds to shareholders

13
Profit margin example (contd)
  • According to previous theory
  • Premium is present value of claims at
    risk-adjusted rate
  • No profit margin
  • Expected shareholder profit consists of the
    earnings on equities purchased with capital raised

14
Why no price for diversifiable volatility?
  • Actuaries version of the question
  • Why would an insurer assume volatile liabilities
    for no reward over and above that for certain
    liabilities equal in expectation?

15
No price for diversifiable volatility (continued)
  • This is the wrong question
  • Correct question
  • Why would a shareholder of an insurer assume an
    exposure to volatile liabilities for no reward
    over and above that for certain liabilities equal
    in expectation?
  • Answer
  • Because the shareholder can reduce the
    additional exposure to volatility to an
    arbitrarily small quantity if it is diversifiable
    (uncorrelated)

16
Expenses and tax
  • Expenses
  • Just add to claims costs
  • Does not change the argument
  • Tax
  • If complete imputation, shareholder situation is
    exactly as if no tax at company level
  • Again no change to argument
  • If incomplete imputation, shareholders suffers
    deadweight of double taxation
  • Premium must be increased to compensate
    shareholder
  • N.B. This is the ONLY source of profit margin

17
Financial economic insurance pricing methods
  • Myers-Cohn
  • Values policy cash flows at risk adjusted RORs
  • Premium such that NPV0
  • Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
  • Values shareholder cash flows at risk adjusted
    RORs
  • Premium such that shareholder IRR risk adjusted
    ROR
  • Risk adjustment takes account of the debt/equity
    structure of shareholding
  • Two approaches can be shown to be different views
    of the same thing (Taylor, 1994)

18
Pricing abuses
  • Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
  • Risk adjusted ROE takes account of the
    debt/equity structure of shareholding
  • Lower risk asset allocation yields lower ROE
  • Some applications of IRR do not observe this
    nexus
  • E.g. assume equity invested risk free but expect
    ROE as if invested in shares

19
Main inputs to pricing
  • Risk adjusted RORs
  • Myers-Cohn
  • Losses
  • IRR
  • Assets
  • Equity
  • Capital base, since it affects
  • Myers-Cohn
  • Quantum of tax (on investment earnings of equity)
  • IRR
  • Net profits payable to shareholders

20
Questions arising
  • Is CAPM reasonable?
  • What are the arguments for assigning a price to
    diversifiable risk?
  • What substitute for CAPM might be made?
  • Does it affect the results materially?
  • What capital base should be assumed for a
    particular LoB
  • What is a reasonable total capitalisation of an
    insurer?
  • How should this total be allocated by line?
  • Should capitalisation mean balance sheet or share
    market capitalisation?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com