Building Evaluation Capacity BEC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Building Evaluation Capacity BEC

Description:

Student Demographic Variables: Race/Ethnicity, Sex, Disability, Citizenship ... OERL, the Online Evaluation Resource Library http://oerl.sri.com/home.html ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: patriciab6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Building Evaluation Capacity BEC


1
Building Evaluation Capacity (BEC)
  • Beatriz Chu Clewell, Urban Institute
  • Patricia B. Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates,
    Inc.

2
BEC The Background Evaluation Capacity
Building (ECB) is a system for enabling
organizations and agencies to develop the
mechanisms and structure to facilitate evaluation
to meet accountability requirements. ECB differs
from mainstream evaluation by being continuous
and sustained rather than episodic. It is
context-dependent it operates on multiple
levels it is flexible in responding to multiple
purposes, requiring continuous adjustments and
refinements and it requires a wide variety of
evaluation approaches and methodologies
(Stockdale et al, 2002).
3
BEC The Project The goal of BEC was to develop
a model to build evaluation capacity in three
different organizations the National Science
Foundation (NSF), the National Institutes of
Health (NIH), and the GE Foundation. More
specifically, the projects intent was to test
the feasibility of developing models to
facilitate the collection of cross-project
evaluation data for programs within these
organizations that focus on increasing the
diversity of the STEM workforce.
4
  • BEC Guide I
  • Designing A Cross-Project Evaluation
  • Evaluation design identification of program
    goals
  • Construction of logic models
  • The evaluation approach, including
  • Generation of evaluation questions
  • Setting of indicators
  • Integration of evaluation questions and
    indicators
  • Measurement strategies including
  • Selection of appropriate measures
  • The role of demographic variables

5
  • Highlights from Guide I
  • Constructing a Logic Model
  • The basic components of a simplified logic model
    are
  • Inputs (resources invested)
  • Outputs (activities implemented using the
    resources)
  • Outcomes/impact (results)

6
Highlights from Guide I Constructing a Logic
Model (continued)
7
Highlights from Guide I Questions
Indicators
8
  • BEC Guide II
  • Collecting and Using Cross Project Evaluation
    Data
  • The strengths and weaknesses of various types of
    formats that can be used in data collection
  • Data collection scheduling
  • Data quality and methods of ensuring it
  • Data unique to individual projects
  • Confidentiality and the protection of human
    subjects in data collection
  • Ways of building data collection capacity among
    projects
  • Rationales, sources, and measures of comparison
    data
  • Issues inherent in the reporting and displaying
    of data
  • The uses to which data might be put

9
Highlights From Guide II Data Collection
Formats
10
Highlights From Guide II Available Information
on Comparison Databases URL Availability Public
Access/ Restricted Use (fees/permission
needed) Data Format Web Download/Other
Electronic Student Demographic Variables
Race/Ethnicity, Sex, Disability, Citizenship Data
Level National, State, Institution,
Student Student Population Pre-College, College,
Graduate School, Employment Survey Population
First Year Most Recent Year Available Other
Variables Attitudes, Course-taking, Degrees,
Employment, etc
11
Highlights From Guide II Making Comparisons
12
Other Sources of Comparison Data
  • The WebCASPAR database (http//caspar.nsf.gov)
    provides free access to institutional level data
    on students from surveys as Integrated
    Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) the
    Survey of Earned Doctorates.
  • The Engineering Workforce Commission
    (http//www.ewc-online.org/) provides
    institutional level data (for members) on
    bachelors, masters and doctorate enrollees
    recipients by sex by race/ethnicity for US
    students by sex for foreign students.
  • Comparison institutions can be selected from the
    Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of
    Teachings website, (http//www.carnegiefoundation
    .org/classifications/) based on Carnegie
    Classification, location, private/public
    designation, size and profit/nonprofit status.

13
Some Web-based Sources of Resources
  • OERL, the Online Evaluation Resource Library
    http//oerl.sri.com/home.html
  • User Friendly Guide to Program Evaluationhttp//w
    ww.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02057/start.htm
  • AGEP Collecting, Analyzing and Displaying
    Datahttp//www.nsfagep.org/CollectingAnalyzingDis
    playingData.pdf
  • American Evaluation Association
  • http//www.eval.org/resources.asp

14
Download the Guideshttp//www.urban.org/publicat
ions/411651.htmlor Google on Building
Evaluation Capacity Campbell
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com