Fostering DisabilityFriendly HIVAIDS Programs in Manipur - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Fostering DisabilityFriendly HIVAIDS Programs in Manipur

Description:

( Nagaland, blind females FGD) Transmission? Via mosquitoes; sex with an unknown person (Manipur, blind male) ... Educated blind want Braille materials ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: lad99
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fostering DisabilityFriendly HIVAIDS Programs in Manipur


1
Fostering Disability-Friendly HIV/AIDS
Programs in Manipur Nagaland
  • Martha Morrow and Heather Dawson
  • HIV Interventions and Research in North-East
    India
  • Recent results from the field
  • Melbourne 5 July 2007

2
Background
  • Globally, little data on HIV awareness and risk
    practices among people with disabilities (PWD)
  • PWD are often socially economically vulnerable
    factors linked to HIV
  • Access to health information services are basic
    human rights
  • Not always in place for PWD

3
Background (contd)
  • 2001 Indian Census est. 2.2 of population
    disabled
  • Disability organisations est. at least 5-6
  • Underestimate attributed to stigma
  • NACO does not target PWD
  • NACP III (2007 2011) opportunity to expand
    focus

4
Background (contd)
  • Nagaland Manipur high HIV-prevalence
  • IDU route but increasingly sexual
  • Cultural taboos inhibit discussion
  • Inadequate data on disability
  • Anecdotally, HIV programs not reaching PWD
  • A gap in understanding the HIV-related needs of
    PWD in northeast India

5
Project Aim Objectives
  • Aim
  • Develop Guidelines to make HIV/AIDS programs more
    disability-friendly
  • Objectives
  • Identify perceptions of PWD HIV risk
  • Identify PWD needs, preferences practical
    mechanisms to respond
  • Use findings and interactive workshops to develop
    Guidelines

6
Research Team
  • MC Arunkumar, Rajeev Irengbam, Pebam
    Krishnakumari Gurumayum Pritam Devi
  • Manipur University
  • Jamedi Longkumer, Ella Mary Kaje, Wetshokhrolo
    Lasuh Toshi Rongsenyangla Aier
  • Independent researchers in Nagaland
  • Rebecca Sinate
  • Emmanuel Hospital Association
  • M Morrow, H Dawson and E Pearce
  • Australian International Health Institute

7
Phases of Project
  • Data gathering and analysis
  • Workshops to draft Guidelines
  • Workshops to refine Guidelines

8
Primary Data Gathering June-Sept 2006
  • Team recruitment and training
  • Preliminary Consultative Workshops to expand and
    refine research topics
  • with PWD disability organisations

9
  • Research Team Dimapur Consultative Workshop

10
Imphal Consultative Workshop
Photo Heather Dawson
11
Primary Data Gathering June-Sept 2006 (contd)
  • Sampling ORCHID and team networks, purposive,
    snowballing
  • PWD 4 FGDs 6 In-depth Interviews per state
  • Blind physically disabled
  • Equal number males and females (FGDs single sex)
  • Aged 18-35
  • Urban

12
Primary Data Gathering June-Sept 2006 (contd)
  • Disability sector 3 In-depth Interviews per
    state
  • HIV/AIDS organisations
  • FGD (1 per state)
  • 52 structured surveys (16 organisations / state)

13
Analysis Oct 2006-Dec 2007
  • Thematic and descriptive analysis of transcripts
    and surveys
  • Evidence from review of international research
    and models
  • Findings used to prepare framework for Guidelines
    workshops

14
Phases of Project (contd)
  • Guidelines Workshops in Imphal and Dimapur with
    PWD and representatives of disability HIV
    sectors
  • December 2006
  • Overview of findings
  • Preliminary draft of Guidelines
  • March 2007
  • Discuss and finalise Guidelines

15
Some of our Challenges
  • Incomplete understanding about HIV transmission,
    esp in Nagaland team
  • Inadequate time to consolidate skills of
    inexperienced researchers
  • Tyranny of distance
  • Bureaucracies running wild

16
A few of our Challenges (contd)
  • Oh yes, masked gunmen in hotel corridor

17
  • Major Findings from Research Phase

18
HIV awareness, vulnerability perceptions
of risk among PWD
  • Difficult to determine number, type of
    disability, location
  • Many housebound
  • Records incomplete
  • Generic PWD does not exist
  • Sex, education, location, type of disability
    when acquired, marital status crucial for
    vulnerability and needs

19
HIV awareness, vulnerability perceptions of
risk (contd)
  • Stigma and social exclusion widespread
  • Superstitions in Manipur
  • Sometimes I feel ashamed. I am not like
    othersso I dont go out. (Nagaland, phys
    disabled female)
  • Many lack confidence to attend community HIV
    activities

20
HIV awareness, vulnerability perceptions of
risk (contd)
  • Gender ethnicity disability vulnerability
  • Reduced life chances
  • Now she has been gradually losing her eyesight
    just like me. So, her mother hides her.
    Thinking that the girl could never get married
    because of her disease, her mother did not allow
    her to have a proper education. (Manipur, blind
    females FGD)
  • Women PWD report sexual exploitation and fear
  • Unmarried blind females should be more
    cautious..We may either be trapped or kidnapped
    by other people because we do not see anything.
    (Manipur, blind female)

21
HIV awareness, vulnerability perceptions of
risk (contd)
  • PWD knowledge good to poor
  • Manipuri traditional concepts
  • But if their blood groups are not compatible,
    the other will not get infected. (Manipur, blind
    female)
  • We should go to the church and the healing power
    can cure HIV. (Nagaland, blind females FGD)
  • Transmission? Via mosquitoes sex with an
    unknown person (Manipur, blind male)
  • Clear messages for PWD to recognise personal risk
    understand prevention may not reach them

22
HIV awareness, vulnerability perceptions of
risk (contd)
  • Most PWD, disability and HIV/AIDS service
    providers felt that PWD can be at risk
  • Could be relatively greater (eg, mobile men,
    hearing- and intellectually-impaired women)
  • Could be relatively lower (housebound)
  • Several PWD admitted risk-taking
  • Some disability programmers had poor knowledge

23
PWD Needs Expressed Preferences
  • Information preferences
  • Should visit door-to-door to identify PWD and
    build trust
  • Educated blind want Braille materials
  • Most want peer-to-peer education IF peers are
    well-informed
  • I think that would be very good because he
    himself would be very happy when he is given such
    a role.  To the disabled community he would
    become a role model. (Manipur, phys disabled male)

24
PWD Needs Expressed Preferences (contd)
  • Service preferences
  • On ground floor, chairs for waiting
  • Many want separate services
  • Esp. women
  • Helpers to make access more confidential
  • Delivered as outreach to overcome mobility
    limitations

25
Practical Challenges for Programming
  • Many PWD can only be reached via a gatekeeper
    (parents, family, carers, guardians, hostel
    directors)
  • Can permit or refuse access
  • may be offended or disbelieving
  • Must gain gatekeepers trust to gain access to
    PWD
  • New models needed to reach PWD indirectly
  • Past humiliation makes some PWD reluctant to go
    out in public

26
Practical Challenges for Programming (contd)
  • HIV organisational constraints
  • Lack of specialist educators, interpreters
  • Cost of specialised services
  • Risk may increase stigma, eg, community may
    assume all PWD have HIV
  • Disability networks and advocacy are
    under-developed
  • Cultural religious taboos inhibit discussion

27
Limitations of Phase I
  • Little data gathered on intellectually disabled
    or hearing-impaired
  • No investigation of needs among people with
    mental illness
  • Small sample, mainly urban, non-random
  • Blind sample biased towards more educated

28
Transportation to Nagaland Consultative Workshop
Photo Alo Lasuh
29
  • Guidelines
  • for Disability-Friendly HIV Programs

30
GUIDELINES Programming Principles
  • Use existing community structures services
  • Develop networks between HIV disability sectors
  • Focus on practical and affordable
  • Involve PWD in development and implementation of
    programs

31
GUIDELINES Different Approaches to be
Disability-Friendly
  • Type I. Little or no program modification, eg
    Invite PWD carers to community programs
    provide chairs at clinics
  • Type II. Minor adaptations, eg
  • Produce material in a variety of formats
    one-point messages, audio, visual
  • Type III. Specialist programs, eg
  • HIV education sessions for hearing-impaired

32
GUIDELINES Modifying HIV Programs
  • Ask PWD and disability service providers to
    sensitise HIV programmers
  • Develop strategies to gain trust and cooperation
    of gatekeepers in order to reach PWD
  • Advocate for rights of all including PWD to
    health information / services, and freedom from
    sexual exploitation

33
GUIDELINES Modifying HIV Programs (contd)
  • Ensure meetings and services are offered in
    places, ways, times to meet needs of different
    types of PWD
  • Provide helpers to enable PWD to gain access and
    retain privacy/confidentiality

34
GUIDELINES Modifying Disability Programs
  • Invite HIV programmers to raise awareness in
    communities and disability organisations about
    HIV risk and prevention for PWD
  • Build capacity of disability service providers to
    provide HIV programs to PWD

35
GUIDELINES Modifying Disability Programs
(contd)
  • Provide practical support for PWD, eg
  • Drop-in centres (in disability facilities) to
    access HIV information
  • Assistance to reach and use HIV services
  • Liaise with community and religious leaders about
    PWD vulnerability, needs and rights
  • Use PWD as peer educators

36
  • Invite PWD and disability service providers to
    sensitise HIV programmer to the needs of PWD
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com