Title: Formal%20logic%20and%20reasoning
17/30/2018
- Chapter 11
- Formal logic and reasoning
- Syllogisms
- Conditional reasoning
- Hypothesis testing
- Decisions
- Psychophsysics and Symbolic distance
- Cognitive maps
Study Question. .Describe the Wasson selection
task. What common type of logical errors are made
by people attempting this task? Compare and
contrast strict and lax criterion for responding.
How can bias effect accuracy rates?
2Logical Reasoning
- Deductive vs. Inductive reasoning
- Deductive Reasoning Drawing a conclusion from a
list of premises by following the rules of logic. - E.g., X has a better basketball team than SMU
- SMU has a better basketball team
than Acadia - therefore, X has a better basketball team than
Acadia - Inductive Reasoning Inferring a principle based
on factual information. - E.g., A store was robbed of 15 TVs
- John has no alibi and 15 TVs in his
house therefore, John is probably involved
in the robbery
3Logical Reasoning
- Syllogisms - A three-statement logical form, two
premises followed by a conclusion. - E.g., All sophomores are students.
- All students pay tuition.
- Therefore, All sophomores pay tuition.
- Abstract/general form
- All A are B
- All B are C
- Therefore, all A are C
4Logical Reasoning
- Syllogisms
- Try this
- All whales are fish
- All fish are insects
- Therefore, all whales are insects??
- Validity An argument is valid if the conclusion
logically follows from the premises. - Truth An arguments validity is not effected by
the truth of the premises.
5Logical Reasoning
- Syllogisms
- Try this
- All whales are ocean dwellers
- Some ocean dwellers are orcas
- Therefore, some orcas are ocean dwellers
- Soundness An argument is sound if it is valid
and the premise are true.
6Logical Reasoning
- Categorical syllogisms Venn diagrams
- All A are B
7Logical Reasoning
8Logical Reasoning
- Syllogisms
- Set Unions
- Some A are B
9Logical Reasoning
- Mutually exclusive sets
- No A are B
10Logical Reasoning
- Categorical syllogisms using Venn diagrams
- All A are B
- All B are C
- Therefore, All A are C (valid conclusion)
11Logical Reasoning
- Categorical syllogisms using Venn diagrams
- All A are B
- Some B are C
- Therefore, Some A are C (Indeterminant)
12Logical Reasoning
- Categorical syllogisms using Venn diagrams
- No A are B
- No B are C
- Therefore, no As are Cs?
13Logical Reasoning
- Categorical syllogisms using Venn diagrams
- Some A are B
- Some B are C
- Therefore, Some As are Cs?
14Logical Reasoning
- Categorical syllogisms using Venn diagrams
- Some A are B
- No B are C
- Therefore, No As are Cs?
15Logical Reasoning
- Conditional Reasoning. Logical determination of
whether the evidence supports, refutes, or is
irrelevant to the stated conditional relationship - A conditional reasoning approach to John and the
TVs - E.g., If P -gt Q If John is the robber, then he
has 15 TVs - Q John has 15 TVs
- therefore, P John is the robber
- Oops I forgot John is a TV repairer who works
out of his home, and none of the TVs that he has
are stolen. - The above argument is not a valid argument
- Affirming the consequence
- This is one of the most common logical errors
16Logical Reasoning
Valid Arguments
Invalid Arguments
17Logical Reasoning
- Conditional Reasoning A test
- 1) E -gt V
- E
- Therefore, ??
- Nothing!
- 2) E -gt V
- V
- Therefore, ??
- E
- 3) E -gt V
- V
- Therefore, ??
- Nothing!
- 4) E -gt V
- E
- Therefore, ??
- V
18Logical Reasoning
- The Wason selection task another test
- Each card has a letter on one side and a number
on the other - What are the fewest cards you need to turn over
to confirm or deny the following hypothesis - If it has a vowel on one side, there is an even
number on the other side
19Logical Reasoning
- The Wason selection task another test
- Concrete with content knowledge
20Logical Reasoning
- Why do we make errors?
- Conditional vs. biconditional (form error)
- If and only if.
- E.g.. If you dont eat your supper, you get no
ice cream - We say or hear a conditional statement, but we
think or mean a biconditional. - Confimation Bias
- We search for positive evidence
- Matching hypothesis
- Memory load and Modus Tollens
21Logical Reasoning
- Hypothesis testing
- Science as a process of disconfirmation
- Statistical testing
- The null hypothesis
- If Null then No effect (if P -gt Q)
- Is an effect (Q)
- We reject the null (P)
22Decisions
- Psychophysics an experimental approach that
attempts to relate psychological experience to
physical stimuli. - Fechner and the difference threshold
- Just Noticeable Difference (JND). The smallest
difference between two similar stimuli that can
be distinguished. - Weber fraction
- Relates changes in stimulus intensity to sensory
magnitude - e.g., 3 people clap 1 more -gt within a JND
- 50 people clap 1 more -gt not within a JND
23Decisions
- Psychophsyics
- The Weber Fraction
24Decisions
- Psychophysics
- Other Weber Fractions
- Vision 1/60
- Kinesthesia 1/50
- Pain 1/30
- Pressure 1/7
- Smell 1/4
- Taste 1/3
25Decisions
- Psychophysics
- Absolute Threshold The critical level of
intensity that gives rise to sensation. - Problems with determining the absolute threshold
- The radar operator example
- Bias versus sensitivity
- Signal detection theory
- Noise and noise plus signal
- E.g., Library noise and library noise plus a
gunshot
26Decisions
- Psychophysics
- Signal detection theory
- Sensitivity
27Decisions
- Psychophysics
- Signal detection theory
- Response Bias Criteria setting
28Decisions
- Psychophysics
- Signal detection theory
- Response Bias Lax criterion
29Decisions
- Psychophysics
- Signal detection theory
- Response Bias Lax criterion
Actual Events Noise Signalnoise
Correct rejection
Noise
Miss
Receiver Operator Chooses
False Alarm 50
Hits 85
Signal
30Decisions
- Psychophysics
- Signal detection theory
- Response Bias Strict criterion
31Decisions
- Psychophysics
- Signal detection theory
- Response Bias Lax criterion
Actual Events Noise Signalnoise
Correct rejection
Noise
Miss
Receiver Operator Chooses
False Alarm 15
Hits 50
Signal
32Decisions
- The symbolic distance effect
- Distance (descriminability) effect The greater
the difference (or distance) between the two
stimuli being compared, the faster the dexision
that that they differ. - E.g.s
33Decisions
- The symbolic distance effect
- Distance (descriminability) effect
34Decisions
- The symbolic distance effect
- The Symbolic Distance (descriminability) effect
A distance (or descriminability) effect that is
based on semantic or other long term memory
knowledge. - E.g., Symbolic imagery effects
- Which is larger a mouse or a horse?
- Which is larger a donkey or a horse?
- Effects mirror (physical) distance effects
- RT is a log function of perceived size discrepancy
35Decisions
- The symbolic distance effect
- The semantic congruency effect. Decisions are
faster when the dimension being judged matches or
is congruent with the implied semantic dimension
36Decisions
- The symbolic distance effect
- Semantic congruency effect
37Decisions
- The symbolic distance effect
- Banks et al. (1976)
- Distance and congruety
- Number magnitude estimates
- Which is larger? 1 or 2 vs. 1 or 5
vs. 8 or 9 vs. 5 or 9
38Decisions
- The symbolic distance effect
- Judging geographical distances
- Holyoaks work
- People judge distances from their own perspective
- E.g., Which are further apart?
- Halifax to Fredericton vs. Calgary to
Vancouver - Semantic / propositional intrusions
- Which is further north, Edmonston, NB or
Victoria, BC?
39 Problems for upcoming lecture
- Complete the following Sequence
- O, T, T, F, F, S, S, E, N, .
- A Buddhist Monk leaves for a retreat atop a
nearby mountain. He leaves at 600 AM and follows
the only path that leads up the mountain. He
travels quickly some of the way, he travels
slowly, he stops for breaks. He arrives at the
top of the mountain at 600 PM. The next morning,
at 600 AM, he descends the mountain, again
travelling at varying paces and with breaks. He
arrives at 600 PM - Is there a point on the trail that the monk
would have passed at exactly the same time of day
on the way up and on the way down the trail? - Three hobbits and three orcs need to cross a
river. There is only one boat, and it can only
hold two creatures at a time. This presents a
problem Orcs are vicious and whenever there are
more orcs than hobbits they immediately attack
and eat the hobbits. Thus, you can never let orcs
outnumber hobbits on either side of the river. - Can you schedule a series of crossing that will
get everyone safely across the river?
40 Problems for upcoming lecture
- Connect these nine dots with four connected
straight lines.
Three people play a card game. Each player has
money in front of them (their ante). One each
hand of this game, one player loses and the other
two players win. The rules state that the loser
must use the money in front of them to double
the amount of money in front of each of the other
two players. They stake their antes and play
three hands. Each of them loses once and no one
goes bust. The each finish with 8.00. What were
the original antes (Hint it is not 2 each).
A landscaper has been instructed to plant four
new trees such that each one is exactly the same
distance away from each of the other trees. Is
this possible?