Title: Gerald A' Miller
1Model Independent Nucleon results
Gerald A. Miller University of Washington
Everything that rises, Martin Puryear
2Outline
- Phenomenological considerations
- proton is not round.
- Model independent
- neutron charge density,
- proton magnetization
- shape of proton
- Experimental progress-Jefferson lab INT program
Jlab-12 Fall 09
3Definitions
2
old helicity conservation
4Expectations- Pre Jlab
Jlab
QF2 /F1
GE/GM
GE/GM
QF2/F1
Q2
Q2
Proton
5Old Interpretation of GE(Q2) is Fourier
transform of charge density
Correct in non-relativistic physics, Galilei
invariance of wave function ?
Relativity ? is frame dependent, initial final
wave functions have different momentum OLD
interpretation of Sachs wrong
QCD- photon hits massless quarks. No matter how
small Q2, there is boost correction GEn Q2
((d3r r2?2C/(mq)2)
-
6Need relativistic 3-quark model Implement
Relativity-Light Front Cooordinates
Time xc t z x0x3 Evolve
p-(p0-p3) Space x-ct-zx0-x3 Momentum
pp0p3 Bjorken variable Transverse position
b, momentum p Separate internal and cm
coordinates
Transverse boosts act like non-relativistic
7Impulse Approximation 1995
Frank, Jennings, Miller 95
g
carry orbital angular momentum
8Ratio of Pauli to Dirac Form Factors 1995
Frank,Jennings, Miller theory, data 2000
Model flat curve due to orbital ang. mom.
9Model exists
- lower components of Dirac spinor
- orbital angular momentum
- shape of proton?? Wigner Eckart
- no quadrupole moment
- spin dependent densities SDD
- non-relativistic example
10?
s r
11Shapes of the proton
three vectors n, K, S
MODEL , HOW TO MEASURE?
12Model Independent
Central charge density of the neutron?
Neutron has no charge, but charge density need
not vanish Is central density positive or
negative? Pion cloud effect- positive One gluon
exchange-positive Today model independent
13The Density
transverse center of mass R
Burkardt
b is distance from cm, R0
14Generalized Parton Dist. GPD
0 skewness
Hq(x,0)q(x) (PDF)
Burkardt
transverse center of mass R
15Burkardt
Integrate on x, Left sets x-0 q(0,b)2
DENSITY right 2 Dim. Fourier T. of F1
16 RESULT
Soper 77
(2?)2
Density
Two dimensional Fourier Transform
17Form factor parameterizations
Kelly PRC70,068202
hep-ex/0602017
18Results
BBBA
Kelly
Negative
Phys.Rev.Lett.99112001,2007
19GeV2
G
GeV2
Negative F1 means central density negative
Phys.Rev.Lett.99112001,2007
20Neutron Interpretation
-
b
Why ? In proton u(x) dominates at high x
b0, in neutron d at b0, Miller Arrington
arXiv0806.3977
21(No Transcript)
22Shapes of the proton
- Relate spin dependent density SDD to experiment
- Phys.Rev.C76065209,2007
23Field theoretic SDD
- Probability for momentum K, and spin direction
n. Matrix elements depend on three vectors n, K,
S
Transverse Momentum Distributions TMDs
xK/P Mulders Tangerman 96
?i?5??i ?0 ?i
24Relate SDD to TMD
- SDD depend on Kx, Ky , Kz equal time
correlation function - TMD depend on x, Kx , Ky ?0 tz correlation
function - Integrate SDD over Kz --gt t0,z0
- Result non-spherical nature of proton related to
h1T?
25Model-Transverse spin-dependent densities
n
n
S
Lattice SDD not zero, proton not round,
Scheirholtz
26Measure e, p ? e, ? X
ST
e
?
e
Cross section has term proportional to cos 3?
Boer Mulders 98
27Summary of SDD
- SDD are closely related to TMDs
- If is not 0, proton is not round.
Experiment can show - proton aint round.
The Proton
28Spin density operator d(r-rp) s . n
PRB65, 144429
- Canted ferromagnetic structure of UNiGe high
magnetic fields - Neutron magnetic scattering
- Neutron, B, crystal
29Charge symmetry u in proton is d in neutron, d
in proton is u in neutron ?u?p?n/2 ?d?p2?n
?p4/3?u-1/3 ?d
30Naive Model of Nucleon
- Proton 2 u, 1 d, Neutron 2 d, 1 u
- Confined quarks move with zero orbital angular
momentum
Spin Crisis Quarks carry only 30 of proton
spin three ideas- u,d quarks surrounded by s
s gluons carry angular momentum quarks
carry orbital angular momentum
31Relativistic Model Explanation