WWW.KDHEKS.GOV - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

WWW.KDHEKS.GOV

Description:

National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone and Particulate Matter. Douglas Watson ... Irritate airways, causing cough, sore throat, shortness of breath ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: dougw2
Learn more at: http://www.sbeap.org
Category:
Tags: gov | kdheks | www | irritate

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WWW.KDHEKS.GOV


1
  • WWW.KDHEKS.GOV

Our Vision Healthy Kansans living in safe and
sustainable environments.
2
Revisions to National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Ozone and Particulate Matter
  • Douglas Watson
  • Kansas Air Quality Seminar
  • March 5-6, 2008
  • Kansas Department of Health and Environment
  • Bureau of Air and Radiation

Our Vision Healthy Kansans living in safe and
sustainable environments.
3
  • Under section 109(d) of the Clean Air Act, EPA
    must review each of its National Ambient Air
    Quality Standards (NAAQS) every five years.

4
Particulate Matter
5
Revisions to Particulate Matter Standards
  • PM2.5 Standards
  • Review completed in 2006
  • EPA strengthened the 24-hr PM2.5 standard from
    1997 level of 65 micrograms per cubic meter
    (µg/m3) to 35µg/m3, and
  • EPA retained the current annual PM2.5 standard at
    15µg/m3

6
Revisions to Particulate Matters Standards
  • Attainment of PM2.5 Standards
  • 24-Hour Standard
  • An area will meet the 24-hour standard if the
    98th percentile of 24-hour PM2.5 concentrations
    in a year, averaged over three years, is less
    than or equal to the level of the standard of 35
    µg/m3
  • Annual Standard
  • An area will meet the annual PM2.5 standard when
    the three-year average of the annual average
    PM2.5 concentration is less than or equal to 15
    µg/m3

7
Revisions to Particulate Matters Standards
  • PM10 Standards
  • EPA retained the existing national 24-hr PM10
    standard of 150µg/m3
  • EPA revoked the annual PM10 standard,
  • Available evidence generally does not suggest a
    link between long-term exposure to current levels
    of coarse particles and health problems
  • EPA protecting all Americans from effects of
    short-term exposure to inhalable coarse particles
    by retaining the existing daily PM10 standard of
    150µg/m3

8
Revisions to Particulate Matter Standards
  • Attainment of PM10 Standards
  • An area will meet the 24-hour PM10 standard when
    the 150µg/m3 level is not exceeded more than once
    per year on average over a three year period

9
Revisions to Particulate Matters Standards
10
Revisions to Particulate Matters Standards
11
Revisions to Particulate Matters Standards
12
8-hour Ozone
13
Proposed Revisions to Ozone Standard
  • On June 20, 2007, EPA proposed revisions to the
    National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
    ground-level ozone
  • The proposed revisions reflect new scientific
    evidence about ozone and its effects on people
    and public welfare
  • The proposed revisions would affect two types of
    ozone standards
  • Primary standards to protect public health,
    including the health of sensitive populations
    such as people with asthma, children, and older
    adults
  • Secondary standards to protect public welfare and
    the environment, including sensitive vegetation
    and ecosystems

14
Proposed Revisions to Ozone Standard
EPAs Current Ozone Standards
  • Current standards were set in 1997 (most recent
    revision)
  • Primary (health-based) and secondary
    (welfare-based) standards are both 0.08 parts per
    million (ppm), with an 8-hour averaging time
  • Because of rounding, these standards are
    effectively 0.084 ppm
  • EPA, states and tribes collect data about ozone
    levels from air pollution monitors. It takes
    three consecutive years of data to determine if
    an area is meeting (attaining) the standards
  • An area attains the current standards if the
    three-year average of the annual fourth-highest
    daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration
    measured at each monitor does not exceed 0.084 ppm

15
Proposed Revisions to Ozone Standard
Proposed Revisions to Primary Ozone Standard
  • The EPA Administrator has determined that the
    current standard is not sufficient to protect
    public health.
  • EPA proposes that a standard set within the range
    of 0.070 to 0.075 ppm would protect public health
    with an adequate margin of safety
  • EPA allowed comment on a range of alternative
    levels for the standard down to 0.060 ppm and up
    to the level of the current standard
  • EPA also proposes to specify the level of the
    primary standard to the nearest thousandth ppm
    (third decimal place)

16
Proposed Revisions to Ozone Standard
  • Exposures to ozone can
  • Reduce lung function, more difficult to breathe
  • Irritate airways, causing cough, sore throat,
    shortness of breath
  • Increased frequency of asthma attacks
  • Inflame and damage the lining of lung
  • Increase susceptibility to respiratory infection
  • Aggravate chronic lung diseases like asthma,
    emphysema, and bronchitis

17
Proposed Revisions to Ozone Standard
18
Proposed Revisions to Ozone Standard
Proposed Revisions to Secondary Ozone Standard
  • EPA is proposing two alternatives for the
    secondary ozone standard
  • A new cumulative, seasonal standard, or
  • A standard identical to the proposed primary
    standard
  • The proposed new seasonal standard is known as
    W126
  • W126 is a cumulative index form that weights and
    sums hourly measurements over a given period of
    time
  • EPA is proposing both a daily and seasonal time
    period over which to cumulate the weighted hourly
    measurements during the ozone season
  • A 12-hour daily period
  • And a seasonal period consisting of the three
    months of maximum W126 index value

19
Proposed Revisions to Ozone Standards
20
Proposed Revisions to Ozone Standard
Milestone Date
SignatureFinal Rule March 2008
Effective Day of Rule (60 days following publication in Federal Register) Approximately June 2008
State Designation Recommendations to EPA June 2009 (based on 2006-2008 monitoring data)
Final Designations Signature Approximately June 2010
Effective Date of Designation Approximately 2010
SIPs Due Approximately 2013
Attainment Dates 2013-2030 depending on severity of problem
21
Kansas City Ozone
  • 2007 Ozone Season
  • Low 4th highest daily maximum 8-hr average ozone
    concentrations from the 2004 ozone season for
    monitors in the Kansas City area drop off the
    3-year average
  • Cool and wet summer in the region led to low
    ozone concentrations for the 2004 ozone season
  • 2005 and 2006 ozone seasons in Kansas City
    yielded many days in which monitors exceeded
    levels of the standard
  • Stage was set for Kansas City to violate ozone
    standard
  • Violation occurred mid-June

22
Kansas City Ozone
  • Understanding the 8-hour Ozone Standard
  • The 3-year average of the 4th highest daily
    maximum 8-hr average ozone concentrations
    measured at each monitor within an area over each
    year must not exceed 0.08 ppm
  • A 3-year average of the 4th highest daily maximum
    8-hr average ozone concentration greater than or
    equal to 0.085 ppm is considered a violation of
    the ozone standard

23
(No Transcript)
24
Kansas City Ozone
  • 2007 Ozone Season Update
  • Three sites currently have 2005-2007 averages of
    the 4th highest daily maximum 8-hr average ozone
    concentrations in violation of standard
  • Rocky Creek 0.087 ppm
  • Liberty 0.087 ppm
  • Trimble 0.085 ppm

25
Kansas City Ozone
  • 2007 Ozone Season Update
  • Kansas Monitors (2005-2007 Design Values)
  • Kansas City, KS JFK 0.077 ppm
  • Leavenworth 0.077 ppm
  • Heritage Park 0.076 ppm

26
Kansas City Ozone
27
QUESTIONS??
28
  • WWW.KDHEKS.GOV
  • dwatson_at_kdhe.state.ks.us

Our Vision Healthy Kansans living in safe and
sustainable environments.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com