Title: JINST Journal of Instrumentation Status Report
1JINST Journal of InstrumentationStatus Report
Amos Breskin Meetings with JINST Editors, CERN,
Feb. 2-3, 2006 (updated March 21 2006)
2Why JINST?
High-quality fast economic new features
Main Competitors
- Elsevier Nuclear Instruments Methods in
Physics Research (NIM A) - 2004 impact factor 1.35
- IEEE IEEE Transactions in Nuclear Science,
Plasma, medical - imaging
- 2004 Impact factor 1.7
- AIP Review of Scientific Instruments
- 2004 Impact factor 1.23
- All 3 publish Scientific articles
Conference proceedings - Generally good Journals
- Printed electronic
- Slow though submission is electronic (recently
also for NIM A) - All 3 have long publishing delay
- Expensive (particularly NIM A)
3How can we become competitive?
- Good editorial advisory boards
- Good editorial office (SISSA) publisher (IOP)
support - Friendly submission (flexible format)
- Strict review policy ? quality
- Attractive features for authors video clips,
database links, - links to citations, free color figures etc
important IOP has - excellent search engine
- Attractive Journal content
- Low prices? recruit also industries,
consultants, etc - (ongoing discussions on Open Access)
- Fast publication
- Liberal copy-right policy (articles on arXiv,
private web, - reuse material in other places)
Advertising JINST comme il faut ? by the
publisher (IOP) by us, within our communities!
4Editorial Board
Advisory Board
Charpak, Lederman, Willis, Skrinsky, Policarpo,
Walenta, Radeka, Nygren
- High-quality, large Editorial Board
- Presently 44 autonomous Editors covering most
fields of Radiation Instrumentation - ? broad scientific competence
- broad knowledge of the field/potential referees
- efficient editor matching to keywords
- ? rapidity of review
- ? quality of review
- ? rapidity of publication
5JINST PRESENT SCOPE
6EDITOR SELECTION
- Editors are selected by the software system
according to keywords provided by the author. - There are at least 2 Editors for each keyword on
our list. - Though we have 44 Editors, it could happen that
an Editor is not properly assigned, exactly in
his field. - In such cases
- - either suggest to the Editorial Office an
alternative - Editor out of JINST list
- - or, if you cannot locate a suitable Editor
inform the Editorial Office
7JINST content
- Regular articles
- Invited Reviews (can start any time!)
- Technical reports
- Instrumentation Theses (in preparation April 06)
- Calendar links to Instrumentation events
- (on home page)
- Useful links (search engines, science,
databases, etc - (on home page)
- Links to Instrumentation groups (in preparation
April 06) - Job offers requests (in preparation April-May
06) - Interactive readers Forum questions/answers
panel - (in preparation April 06)
8PUBLICATIONS IN JINST
- Regular articles submitted to editors according
to keywords. - Technical reports IDEM.
- Regular articles may be degraded into technical
reports by referees/editors, according to the
general instructions to reviewers. - Invited Reviews Reviews of general interest.
Invited by Editors and members of the SAB. - Instrumentation theses submitted to JINST
Scientific Director, generally by the students
supervisor, after being accepted by the
University. Only genuine Instrumentation theses
will be published after evaluation. They will
be classified in sections similar to the
articles sections.
9REVIEW POLICY
- Invited Review articles will be refereed by the
inviting person (incl. SAB member). Allocated
time 6 months for submission 8 weeks for the
referee 8 weeks for authors revision. - Articles Technical reports 1 week for
accept/decline by editor/referee 3 weeks for
the editor/referee 1/3 weeks for authors
minor/major revision - Theses No review - just general evaluation of
quality and relevance. 4 weeks for accepting.
10REVIEW CRITERIA(following questions of some
Editors)
- We aim QUALITY RELEVANCE
- The review criteria can be
- - Novelty
- - Originality
- - Scientific value
- - Technical value (mainly for Technical
Reports - - Language and technical issues
- - Referencing
- - NEWLY DEVELOPING COUNTRY criteria (add a
correction coefficient to support work done in
such countries, but insist on relevance to JINST
language corrections in the revision phase) - In the revision process you have an OPTION of
applying virtual or real scores, e.g. - - Accepted Papers 8-10
- - Accepted Technical Reports 6-7
- - Rejection Below these scores
11ADVERTISING JINST
- A broad database of instrumentation-oriented
scientists exists and is constantly updated. - Sources Conferences, Associations, large
experiments, Institutions etc. (some do not
provide access to mailing-lists but diffuse our
advertising material) - e-advertisements sent to gt 4000 persons
- Printed leaflets of JINST distributed _at_ IEEE05
will be distributed in bags of most
instrumentation conferences. Editors will get
soon leaflets for personal distributions. - Sort article in CERN courier (1-2/06) note on
CERN library web future advertisements in other
press, institutional brochures, web sites etc.
incl. arXiv. - Posters in preparation
- We dig out daily relevant papers deposited in
arXiv and suggest authors to submit to JINST
present and future papers.
12SUBMISSIONS STATUS March 20, 06
- 27 papers submitted since Jan 9 JINST launch
- 6 accepted
- 6 rejected
- 5 not suitable
- 3 withdrawn following suggestion to author
- 7 in review process
- Promised in preparation for submission to JINST
by colleagues approached by me/others - Many promised articles by potential authors who
responded to the e-advertisement or to the note
sent after their submissions to arXiv.
13EDITORS URGENT TASKS
- Pls help advertising, by all possible means.
- Pls help providing mailing lists, suggest
contacts (institutional journals, experiments,
conferences etc), or diffuse our standard
letter among mailing listsother ideas. - We are missing so far mailing lists in
accelerators, medical instrumentation, plasma,
synchrotron radiation, astronomy and
astrophysics, etc. Pls help approaching these
communities - Pls submit papers to JINST asap
- Pls suggest others to submit to JINST