Nikki Longden, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Nikki Longden,

Description:

It is particularly important for you to demonstrate that you understand signal ... verbs, replacing an adjective with a synonym; acknowledgement in the references. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: nicolal
Category:
Tags: longden | nikki | synonym

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nikki Longden,


1
WRITING UP YOUR MINI-PROJECT Workshop 2
Assessment Referencing
  • Nikki Longden,
  • Communication Systems
  • Robert Blake, SLDC

2
Writing Up Your Mini Project Outline
  • In workshop 2
  • How your report will be assessed what are
    lecturers looking for?
  • Referencing and avoiding plagiarism

3

PART 1 WHAT LECTURERS ARE LOOKING FOR IN
MINI-PROJECT REPORTS
4
What Lecturers Are Looking For In Your
Mini-project Report
  • Communications Fundamentals
  • It is particularly important for you to
    demonstrate that you understand signal
    representations in Matlab digital filtering
  • You should not copy anything directly from the
    exercise handout

5
What Lecturers Are Looking For In Your
Mini-project Report
  • Each exercise may require you to apply a number
    of techniques to reach the solution
  • Exercises 1 to 4 ask you to discuss specific
    results within the report
  • You do need to discuss the results of the other
    exercises why you have chosen specific
    techniques
  • Explaining systems the results you obtain will
    get you higher marks than perfect code

6
What Lecturers Are Looking For In Your
Mini-project Report
  • Although you may work in small groups to complete
    your tasks, the report that you generate must be
    individual work demonstrate your understanding
    of the work undertaken

7
What Lecturers Dont Want In Your Mini-project
Report
  • We do not want a large section on background
    information X
  • We do not want to see the exercises, or other
    text, copied from the handouts X
  • We do not want to see results without an
    explanation or an evaluation X
  • We do not want to see unlabelled figures or
    tables X
  • We do not want to see figures or tables that are
    not referred to explicitly in the body of text
    do not just stick graphs in X
  • We do not want to see a references a list of
    books which you have read but you do not
    reference material from X

8
What Lecturers Are Looking For In Your
Mini-project Report
  • Referencing if you want to use someone elses
    work, then you should put it in your own words
    reference where it came from v
  • A short introduction telling us what you have
    done for each exercise v
  • A discussion of the design of your solution v
  • Your results label the graphs or you will lose
    marks (axes with units, title caption) v
  • A discussion evaluation of your results what
    they show you v
  • A conclusion v
  • A table of contents list of figures v
  • An abstract this is not an introduction but a
    complete overview of your report in 100 200
    words v

9
What Lecturers Are Looking For In Your
Mini-project Report
  • A title page v
  • A declaration v
  • All code that you have generated for the mini
    project in a structured appendix this can be in
    printed form at the end of your report or on a CD
    v
  • Any scripts, questionnaires, story boards etc. v

10
What Lecturers Are Looking For In Your
Mini-project Report
  • If you use a CD it must be labelled with your
    name mini project securely attached to the
    report
  • The items contained in the Appendix must be
    referred to in the body of the report

11
What Lecturers Are Looking For In Your
Mini-project Report
  • Do not leave the report to the last minute!
  • The report should be a coherent body of work
    telling us what you have done what you have
    found out
  • The report is an individual piece of work, it
    should not be written as a group or plagiarised,
    i.e. copied from somewhere else without reference

12
What Lecturers Are Looking For In Your
Mini-project Report
  • NB - Completing a mini project task correctly or
    to a high standard obtaining the correct
    results does not automatically entitle you to the
    full marks available
  • The report is your way to show us what you have
    done found out during your mini project
  • The report anything included as an Appendix to
    your report is the only thing that we can mark
    your entire mark for the mini project depends
    upon it

13
What Lecturers Are Looking For In Your
Mini-project Report
  • Comments about the Introduction to C Matlab
    reports
  • These were not completed to MSc standard
  • In some cases there was no description of the
    tasks undertaken, only a presentation of the
    results obtained.
  • In other cases there was only a description of
    the tasks undertaken
  • Missing report elements
  • Page numbers
  • Figure captions, labels units
  • Contents pages, list of figures lists of tables

14
What Lecturers Are Looking For In Your
Mini-project Report
  • Comments about the Introduction to C Matlab
    reports
  • There was poor use of scientific English you
    must be specific precise in the language you
    use
  • In some cases there was poor use of English
  • Conclusions should not include general
    statements about the exercises such as they were
    very hard, I learned a lot from them, they
    were interesting
  • An abstract is not an introduction to the report
    but a summary of what you have undertaken what
    you have found out / understood / produced
  • I we can be used in video production reports

15
What Lecturers Are Looking For In Your
Mini-project Report
  • Comments about the Introduction to C Matlab
    reports
  • Incorrect section numbering
  • Sections were not always given a title
  • Use of overlong quotations in the introduction
  • Formulae should not have a caption
  • Figures and tables should be centred and should
    not expand further than the text into the margins
  • Referencing, especially for web based resources,
    was not always in the correct style
  • Sections were given in the wrong order
  • Do not copy any text at all from the handout!

16

PART 2REFERENCING AND AVOIDING PLAGIARISM
17
AVOIDING PLAGIARISM
  • Plagiarism means using other writers ideas,
    words or frameworks without acknowledgement. It
    means that you are falsely claiming that the work
    is your own. This can range from copying whole
    papers, paragraphs, sentences or phrases without
    acknowledgement to merely changing a word or two
    within a sentence.

18
Avoiding plagiarism
19

Which of these is plagiarism?
  • 1. Copying a paragraph verbatim from a source
    without any acknowledgement.
  • 2. Copying a paragraph and making small changes -
    e.g. replacing a few verbs, replacing an
    adjective with a synonym acknowledgement in the
    references.
  • 3. Cutting and pasting a paragraph by using
    sentences of the original but omitting one or two
    and putting one or two in a different order, no
    quotation marks with an in-text acknowledgement
    plus references.
  • 4. Composing a paragraph by taking short phrases
    from a number of sources and putting them
    together using words of your own to make a
    coherent whole with an in-text acknowledgement
    references.
  • 5. Paraphrasing a paragraph by rewriting with
    substantial changes in language and organisation
    the new version will also have changes in the
    amount of detail used and the examples cited
    citing in references.
  • 6. Quoting a paragraph by placing it in block
    format with the source cited in text
    references.
  • Carroll J. 2000 Teaching News November, 2000.
    Based on an exercise in Academic Writing for
    Graduate Students by Swales and Feale, University
    of Michigan, 1993 on http//www.ilt.ac.uk/resourc
    es/Jcarroll.htm Accessed 12/05/2003

20
Bringing other scientists results into your
writing
  • Why do we bring other scientists results into
  • our work?

21
BRINGING OTHER SCIENTISTS RESULTS INTO YOUR
WRITING
  • To demonstrate to readers examiners that we are
    familiar with the field that we have been
    selective in reviewing relevant studies
  • To provide an overview of current knowledge in a
    particular area of application and or/methodology
  • To provide a context for our current study and to
    locate our it within a specific field
  • To review other studies critically
  • To highlight a gap in knowledge, areas of
    application, etc
  • To justify the use of a particular methodology or
    area of application,
  • To establish the validity of data cited
  • To construct scientific knowledge on the basis of
    other scientists findings.

22
Bringing other scientists results into your
writing
  • Looking at slide 18, which do you think are the
    most important reasons for citing other
    scientists?

23
METHODS OF BRINGING OTHER SCIENTISTS INTO OUR
WRITING
  • We can either do this by rephrasing the original
    in our own words adding an
    acknowledgement.
  • This can either through
  • 1 - summary
  • or
  • 2 - paraphrase
  • Direct quotation acknowledgement is rarely used

24
Integrating sources into your report
  • When referring other studies, they need to be
    integrated into your report.
  • You need to use your own writing style your
    voice, rather than the disconnected styles of
    other researchers.
  • So when you refer to another writer, you should
    begin end in your own impersonal voice, with
    the middle part consisting of paraphrase or
    summary of the source

25
Citation referring to other writers in the main
body of your report
  • When youve paraphrased or summarised another
    writer, always acknowledge the source. You can do
    this in 2 ways
  • 1) Paraphrase the idea, then give the surname of
    the author year of publication in brackets or
    reference number e.g.
  • Statistical analysis can be used to demonstrate
    Berridge 2002 or 2
  • This method emphasises the study.
  • 2) Begin the sentence with the authors surname
    year of publication in brackets e.g. Berridge
    2002 or 2 has demonstrated that statistical
    analysis can be used
    This method emphasises the author you are
    citing.

26
Bringing in the work of other scientists
references
  • References should list alphabetically all the
    sources (books, journal, webs material etc) that
    you have used in the text. Do not include common
    knowledge http//owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/
    research/r_plagiar.html
  • There are 2 main methods of listing references
  • 1. in alphabetical order i.e. sorted by surname
    (Harvard)
  • 2. In numerical ordering of appearance in the
    body of the dissertation/thesis.
  • See http//www.uefap.co.uk/writing/writfram.htm
  • Consult your postgrad handbook for format.

27
Web references in the reference list author
year system
  • Curtis, P.S. (2003) UMBS Forest Carbon Cycle
    Research. UMBS research. Ameriflux network. UMBS
    data access. http//cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/amerifl
    ux/data/us-sites/preliminary-data/UMBS (data
    accessed on February 14, 2003)
  • Wofsy, S.C. and J. W. Munger (2003), Harvard
    University. Atmospheric Sciences. Forest and
    Atmospheric Measurements. Data exchange. NIGEC
    data archive. http//www-as.harvard.edu/data/nigec
    -data.html (accessed on June 23, 2003)

28
Web references in the reference list numerical
system
  • 1 Curtis, P.S. UMBS Forest Carbon Cycle
    Research. UMBS research. Ameriflux network. UMBS
    data access. http//cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/amerifl
    ux/data/us-sites/preliminary-data/UMBS (data
    accessed on February 14, 2003)
  • 2 Wofsy, S.C. and J. W. Munger, Harvard
    University. Atmospheric Sciences. Forest and
    Atmospheric Measurements. Data exchange. NIGEC
    data archive. http//www-as.harvard.edu/data/nigec
    -data.html (accessed on June 23, 2003)

29
Citation referring to other writers in the main
body of your report
  • From the following reference list, answer the
    following questions
  • 1 - What information is given in a reference?
  • 2 - What order is the information given in?
  • 3 - What style is used for presenting the
    information?

30
Citation referring to other writers in the main
body of your report
  • References
  • 1 The MathWorks Inc., 3 Apple Hill Drive,
    Natick, MA 01760-2098. Communications Toolbox
    Users Guide, fourth edition, May 2001.
  • 2 The MathWorks Inc., 3 Apple Hill Drive,
    Natick, MA 01760-2098. Signal Processing Toolbox
    Users Guide, seventh edition, June 2001.
  • 3 A. Bateman. Digital Communications. Design
    For The Real World. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
  • 4 J. O. Smith III. Mathematics of the Discrete
    Fourier Transform (DFT). W3K,2003.
  • 5 Douglas Comer. Computer Networks and
    Internets. Prentice Hall, second edition,1999.

31
Referencing exercise
  • In small groups, read the articles that have been
    given to you
  • Write a short paraphrase of the content for each
    article.
  • Be sure to include citations in the paraphrase.
  • Create a reference list for all of the source
    documents

32
Citation referencing further help
  • For further advice see Andy Gilletts very
    helpful UEFAP site. Look under citation and
    reporting http//www.uefap.co.uk/writing/writfram.
    htm
  • MAKING A REFERENCE LIST
  • Again look at Andy Gilletts page on writing,
    then look for references
  • http//www.uefap.co.uk/writing/writfram.htm

33

Avoiding plagiarism
  • Ensure that you are using effective paraphrasing
    and summary skills. See
  • http//www.uefap.co.uk/writing/writfram.htm
  • or for help with paraphrase see
  • http//owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/research/
    r_paraphr.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com