Title: Lifetime Measurements
1Lifetime Measurements
2Time Domain and Frequency Domain Measurements
- Sample excited with pulse of light. Width shorter
than the decay time of the sample - Measured through a polarizer oriented at 54.7
degrees (magic angle). Avoids effects of
rotational diffusion and anisotropy
3Frequency Domain Measurements
- Sample excited with intensity modulated light
- Intensity of light is varied at high frequency (?
2p times frequency in hertz) - Emission delayed relative to the excitation
measured in phase shift (?) - Polarizers at magic angle are also used
4Meaning of Lifetime Decay
- dn(t) / dt -(? knr) n(t) , where n(t) is the
number of excited molecules - n(t) n0exp(-t/?)
- Experimentally observe intensity, I(t) , which
is proportional n(t) - I(t) I0 exp (-t/?)
- Time at which intensity reaches 1/e
- Plot log I(t) versus t
- Average period of time fluorophore in excited
state complicated with multiexponential decay
5Phase Modulation Lifetimes
- Modulation of emission is measured relative to
modulation of the excitation m (B/A)/(b/a) - Phase angle (?) measured from the zero-crossing
times of the modulated components - ?? ?-1tan ? ?m ?-11/m2-11/2
6Frequency Domain
Time Domain
7Multiexponential Decays
Protein containing to tryptophan probes two
lifetimes equal to 5 ns Addition of a collisional
quencher reduces the lifetime of exposed
tryptophan altering the decay to contain to
components I(t) a1e-t/5 a2e-t/1 Preexponential
factors fractional amount of each flourophore
in each environment
8- Anisotropy decays also use exponential decay laws
and are on the nanosecond time scale - Anisotropy decays are subject to more factors -
rotation of the fluorophore and the protein
(shape of the protein or protein complex)
9Fitting Time Multiexponential Decays
- Difficult to distinguish between a change in
amplitude or lifetime - Because they are correlated parameters
10Time Correlated Single Photon Counting
- Start signal triggers voltage ramp of the time
amplitude converter (TAC) - Voltage ramp stopped when first photon emitted
- Produces an output signal that is proportional to
the time between start and stop signals - Multi-channel analyzer (MCA) converts this
voltage into a time channel using a analog to
digital converter - Histogram generated of counts vs. time channels
- No more than one photon per 100 laser pulses
11- Counted Photons are collected in discrete
channels with known time and width - Instrument response function (IRF) shortest
time profile that can be measured by the
instrument - The fitted decay curve takes into account the
IRF
12Removing IRF from the Data
Measured decay is the sum of the exponential
decays due to the IRF and the sample
13Picosecond Dye Lasers
Mode Locking prevents continuous output.
Changes to an 80 MHz pulse train by a
mode-locking crystal within the laser
cavity. Cavity Dumping acousto-optic device. A
burst of radio frequency signal is put on the AO
crystal. Laser beam deflected 1-3 degrees,
deflects the beam out of the laser cavity.
14Wavelength Tunable to be monochromatic
15Femtosecond Dye Lasers
TitaniumSapphire - Capable of pulse widths of
100 fs
16Flashlamps
- Larger pulse width (2 ns)
- Lower intensity
- Gas used determines wavelength
- Time-profile of lamp can change during acquisition
17Assumptions of Non-linear Least Squares Analysis
- All experimental variability is in the dependent
variable - Uncertainties in the dep. Variable are
distributed in a Guassian - There are no systematic errors in the dep. or
indep. Value - The assumed fitting function is the correct
mathematic description of the system - The data points are all independent observations
- There is a sufficient number of data points so
that the parameters are over determined
18(No Transcript)
19Least Squares Analysis
- ?2 ?(1/?2k)N(tk) NC(tk)2
- ?2 ?N(tk) NC(tk)2 / N(tk)
- Standard deviation is known to be the square root
of the number of photons - Relative uncertainty decreases as the number of
photons increases - ?2 is expected to be equal to the number of data
points (channels) - Values of ? and ? are varied until ?2 is
minimized
20Reduced ?2
- ?2R ?2 / n-p ?2 /?
- ? (degrees of freedom) n-p, number of data
points number of floating parameters - Value close to 1 is expected for good fit
- Number of data points is much larger than
parameters - Start with least complex model if data does not
fit significantly better with more complex model
then do not use
21Goodness of fit
- ?2R can be related to the probability that the
values obtained are a result of randomness in
data - P 0.05 is a good cut-off - Systematic errors
can contribute up to 10-20 elevation of ?2R - Small deviations in ?2R may not be significant
2-fold decrease is significant - Autocorrelation Function deviations randomly
distributed about zero. Correlation between the
deviations in all the channels
22Two Widely Spaced Lifetimes
- Mixture of p-T in Ethanol
- Data does not fit well to single exponential
decay - Log plot shows two phases
- Residuals should be randomly distributed about
zero - F-statistic ratio of ?2R values, probability of
random error contributing to differences between
fits
23Two Closely Spaced Lifetimes
- Mixture of anthranilic acid (AA) and
2-aminopurine (2-AP) - Data does not fit well to single exponential
decay - Amplitudes of each component not well determined
- As lifetimes become closer together parameter
values become more closely correlated
24Three Closely Spaced Lifetimes
- Indole, AA, and 2-AP
- Indole at long times plot becomes non-linear,
long tail - Due to impulse response function continued
excitation (must be removed from fit) - Improvement in ?2R value with single to triple
exp. - F-statistic 90-95 probability that two decay
time not adequate description of data
25(No Transcript)
26Intensity Decay Laws
- Pre-exponential factors
- Single fluorophore same radiative decay rate in
each environment fraction of molecules in each
environment at t0 - Mixture of fluorophores quantum yield,
intensity, observation wavelength, concentrations
27Single Tryptophan Protein
- R6G dye with frequency doubled to 295
- Emission monochrometer set at 360 nm
- What fit would you accept?
28(No Transcript)
29Microsecond Decays
- Direct digitation of time dependent intensity
- Wide IRF 14 ns
- Deconvolution not necessary
30Picosecond Decays
- Need femtosecond laser
- Fast detector