Title: Observational Cosmology:
1Observational Cosmology An Introduction
Wolfgang Hillebrandt MPI für Astrophysik
Garching
Heraeus-Workshop, Bremen, September 25 - 29, 2006
2Acknowledgement To a large extend, these
lectures are based on a lecture series given by
Matthias Steinmetz at the University of Arizona,
Tucson, in 2001.
3(No Transcript)
4The new Cosmos.
5The Scientific Method
specific instances
? Science is a history of corrected mistakes
(Popper)
6Outline of the lectures
- Historical overview
- The standard model of cosmology
- Classical tests and predictions
- The cosmic expansion rate
- The cosmic microwave background
- Primordial nucleosynthesis
- Formation of large-scale structure and galaxies
7Historical Overview
8Aristotle (350 B.C.) First coherent physical
model
- Everything on Earth composed of four elements
earth, water, air and fire - Each of these elements moves differently earth
toward the center of the Universe, fire away from
the center, water and air occupy the space
between. - Earth at the center of the Universe
- Objects of different composition fall differently
- Concept of force Motions that deviate from the
natural motion of the element must be sustained
by a force.
9Aristotles cosmology
- In contrast to Earthly motions, celestial motions
do continue indefinitely ? two types of motion
limited, straight towards/away from the center
(Earthly realm) and continuing on circles in the
heavens - Celestial bodies cannot be composed of Earthly
elements ? ether as a fifth element - Limited motion on Earth/indefinite motion in the
heavens reflect imperfect Earth/perfect heavens - Eternal and unchanging heavens ? Universe without
beginning or end - Universe has a finite size
10Aristarchus (250 B.C.) the Sun
at the center
- He knew the size of the Earth (roughly)
- He knew the size of the Moon and the distance
between the Moon and the Earth (from lunar
eclipses) - Using basic geometry, he was able to determine
the size and distance of the Sun - Result The Sun is 19 times todays value 390
times more distant than the Moon and (because it
has the same apparent size on the sky) is 19
times larger than the Moon (and also much larger
than Earth) - Conclusion the Sun (i.e. the largest object) is
at the center of the universe
11Aristarchus Measuring the distance of the Sun
12Aristarchus Why was his model never accepted by
his contemporaries?
- He was considered a mathematician, not an
astronomer - He stood against the two main authorities of his
time, Aristotle and Hipparchus - His model was in conflict with the physics of his
time, in particular Aristotles physics - no evidence for the Earth rotating
- no evidence for the Earth moving
13Ptolemy (100 A.D.) defines the cosmology for
the next 1500 years
- Assembled the astronomical knowledge (basically
Aristotles cosmology and Hipparchus
observations) ? Almagest (The Great System) - Expanded and improved the models
- Patched up inconsistencies ? Epicycle theory
- but at the expense of giving up simplicity
14Retrograde motion
15Epicycle model
16Ptolemy (100 A.D.) defines the cosmology for
the next 1500 years
- Assembled the astronomical knowledge (basically
Aristotles cosmology and Hipparchus
observations) ? Almagest (The Great System) - Expanded and improved the models
- Patched up inconsistencies ? Epicycle theory
- But at the expense of giving up simplicity
- Thomas Aquinas ? cornerstone of Christian
doctrine - Believe that all that could be discovered had
already been discovered
17Problems of Ptolemys model
- Model couldnt fit observations
- put the Earth off center
- epicycles upon epicycles
- total of more than 100 epicycles
- Nevertheless errors in the predicted positions of
planets accumulated to several degrees by 1400
A.D.
King Alfonso X If the Lord Almighty had
consulted me before embarking upon Creation, I
should have recommended something simpler
18The Copernican Revolution (1500)
- 15th century rediscovery of Greek scientific
thought - Shape and size of the Earth were well known among
educated people (Columbus myth) - Nicholas Copernicus De revolutionibus orbium
coelestrium On the Revolution of Heavenly
Spheres put the Sun at the center ?
heliocentric world model inspired by the work of
Aristarchus ?
19Why is the heliocentric model so attractive ?
- Its simple
- It naturally explains why the inner
planets Mercury and Venus never travel far
from the Sun - Reproduces much better the observed change in
brightness of planets - It provides a natural explanation for the seasons
- It provides a natural explanation of retrograde
motions without relying on epicycles
20Heliocentric model
21Problems of the heliocentric model (at that time)
- Against Christian Scriptures
- New discovery
- Predicts parallaxes ?observation
- Problem rotating Earth ?Aristotles physics
- Less accurate than the Ptolemaic model ? working
model required even more epicycles - Question Why did he published his work only near
the end of his life ? Was he afraid of the
authority of the Church or was he embarrassed
because of the failure of his model ?
22Just being smart is not enough ...
- Better data
- Final touch-up of the model
- Promotion of the new model
- Tycho Brahe
- Johannes Kepler
- Galileo Galilei
23Tycho Brahe (1546-1601)
- Last of the great naked-eye observers
- exceptionally careful and systematic observer ?
first modern scientist - Earth at center, planets orbit the Sun
- detailed measurement of Mars orbit over 30 years
- Observed comets and parallax of comets ? Comet
behind the orbit of the Moon - Observed a supernova new star in Cassiopeia,
no parallax measurable ? supernova must be on
celestial sphere
? Challenge of the Aristotelian idea of the
perfect, eternal, unchanging heavens
24Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
- Tychos successor in Prague
- He realized that neither the Ptolemaic nor
Tychos nor the heliocentric model can fit
Tychos data within the stated accuracy - Proposal planets move on ellipses, not circles
Circle distance to the center is constant
25Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
- Has not invented the telescope !
- But was the first to point the
telescope at the night sky - Designed tests for Aristotles physics and
finally rejected it - Famous for his trial for heresy 1633
- Exonerated in 1980 !
26Galileos astronomical discoveries
- Mountains on the Moon similar to Earth? not
perfect spherical bodies - Stars point like planets spheres
- Phases of Venus ? Ptolemaic world system
- Moons of Jupiter ? miniature system
- Interpretation of Sun spots ? unchanging heavens
- Milky Way Zillions of Stars
27Galileos physics
- Concept of inertia and momentum
- Aristotle force is responsible for motion
- Galileo force is responsible for changes in
motion - ? relativity of uniform motion
- Fall experiments objects of different
composition fall at the same rate ? Aristotle?
basis for Einsteins equivalence principle - Thought experiments
28- Better data
- Final touch-up of the model
- Promotion of the new model
- Tycho Brahe
- Johannes Kepler
- Galileo Galilei
Still missing someone to put the pieces together
to form a coherent physical theory in the modern
sense ? Sir Isaac Newton
29Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727)
- Fundamental contributions in optics, physics and
mathematics - invented calculus (independently Leibnitz)
- invented the mirror telescope
- discovered than white light is composed of
colored light - theory of mechanics
- theory of gravity
- demonstrated that Keplers laws are a consequence
of the theory of mechanics and gravity Principia
30Newtons three laws
- Newtons first law A body at rest or in the
state of - uniform motion will remain at rest or in uniform
motion, - unless acted upon by a net external force.
Newtons second law The acceleration of an
object is equal to the net force applied to it,
divided by its mass.
Newtons third law For every action, there is an
equal and opposite reaction.
31Newtons triumph discovery of Neptune
- 1781 W. Herschel discovers Uranus
- Measurements of Uranus orbit around the Sun
slight deviations from perfect ellipse. These
cannot be accounted for by the perturbing
influence of the known planets ? another planet ? - Leverrier and Adams calculated the position of a
hypothetical planet that could be responsible for
the observed deviations - Galle (1846) pointed a telescope to the predicted
position and found the new planet (Neptune)
within 1 of the predicted position
32Next step apply Newtons laws to cosmology
- Problem 1750 universe identical with solar
system. Stars far away, but how far ? - We need empirical data regarding the size and age
of the universe, so we can compare model
predictions against data
33Determining the Size and Age of the Universe???
34How do we measure distances in daily life ?
- Parallaxes
- Travel time
- Via size of objects comparison with standard
yard sticks - Via brightness of objects comparison with
standard candles
35Parallaxes
- Measure the position of an object with respect to
its background - Nearby objects show a larger motion than
objects far away do - The parallax angle q , the distance of the object
D and the diameter of the Earths orbit d are
connected by simple geometrical relations. For
small angles, it is d D ? q units !!!! q
measured in rad !
36(No Transcript)
37Travel time
- If you know the speed v youre traveling with and
the travel time ?t, the distance D can be
obtained by simple multiplication
D v ?t - Astronomy Use light travel times, i.e. v 300
000 km/sec
38Comparison with a standard ruler
- An object nearby spans a larger angle than an
object of identical physical size far away - The physical size l of the object, its distance D
and the angle q under which it appears are
connected by simple geometrical relations. For
small angles, it is l D ? q units !!!! q
measured in rad ! - If the physical size l of an object is known (?
standard ruler), its distance D can be determined
by measuring the angle q under which the object
appears
39Comparison with a standard candle
- A nearby object appears brighter than an object
of same luminosity far away - The absolute luminosity Labsolute of an object,
its distance D and its apparent luminosity
Lapparent are connected by simple geometrical
relations. It is Lapparent Labsolute / D2
- If the absolute luminosity Labsolute of an object
is known (? standard candle), its distance D can
be determined by measuring its apparent
luminosity Lapparent
40Three Types of Distance Measurement
- Direct Measurements Measuring the physical
- distance to an object directly
41Direct Measurements (Important!)
- Light Travel Time Measure the time taken for a
radar pulse to bounce off of an object or a
signal to arrive from a spacecraft - Parallax Stars appear to wobble
- when observed from different
- directions the nearer the star,
- the larger the motion. Good to
- 1 kpc
42Standard Rulers
- Expanding Photosphere Method (EPS or
Baade-Wesselink) - Type II supernova explosions
- Measure speed of expansion of debris and time
since explosion Þ real size of nebula - Useful to distances of 10-100 Mpc
43Standard Rulers
- Water Masers Measure the proper motions and
accelerations of water masers in the accretion
disks of AGN to get actual orbital radius of
masers and mass of central object. Only one
measurement so far. - Gravitational lensing Time delay of fluctuations
in lensed object gives info on geometry. Depends
on mass of lens and theoretical lensing model.
Good to 1 Gpc
44Standard Candles (Important!)
- Main Sequence fitting Calibrate the luminosity
of main sequence stars in nearby clusters with
parallax distances and fit clusters farther out.
Good to 10-100 kpc.
45Standard Candles
- Luminosity functions
- Choose a type of object with a charcteristic
distribution of absolute luminosities - Measure distribution of apparent luminosities in
a distant galaxy - Scale to match true luminosities, get distance
- Globular clusters and planetary nebulae good to
50-100 Mpc
46Standard Candles (Important!)
- Cepheid and RR Lyrae variables
- Pulsating stars which change in brightness with a
characteristic period - Period is proportional to absolute luminosity
- Common and bright (esp. Cepheids), thus visible
in nearby galaxies - Good to 20 Mpc
47Standard Candles
- Surface brightness fluctuations
- Distant objects appear smaller
- More stars per pixel in a galaxy far, far away
- Smoother light distrubution, less variation from
pixel to pixel - Amplitude of fluctuations proportional to
distance - Good to 100 Mpc, z0.01
48Courtesy John Tonry
49Standard Candles (Important!)
- Galaxy kinematics
- Tully-Fisher relation rotation speed of spiral
galaxies proportional to mass of glaxy
proportional to total luminosity - Dn-s, Fundamental Plane, Faber-Jackson
relations velocity dispersion and size of
elliptical galaxies proportional to total
luminosity - Good to 500 Mpc, z0.1
50Standard Candles (Important!)
- Type Ia supernovae
- Exploding white dwarf star
- Shape of light curve and dimming timescale give
absolute luminosity - Extermely luminous so they can be observed at
great distances - Good to 1 Gpc, z1
51Other Methods
- Novae as standard candles not very standardized,
good only to 20 Mpc - Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect good to 1 Gpc, z1
but model dependent, not well calibrated yet.
Measure density of x-ray emitting gas in clusters
with CMB, measure temperature independently,
gives absolute x-ray luminosity.
52The Distance Ladder
- Different techniques useful at different
distances use nearby standards to calibrate more
distant ones where they overlap - Cepheids are a key step many in the Milky Way
and LMC, so distances are directly measurable by
parallax or only a step away, yet bright enough
to overlap many secondary distance indicators - Cepheids ? luminosity functions, SBF, galaxy
kinematics, SNIa
53The Distance Ladder
- Gravitational lensing, Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect,
Expanding Photosphere Method provide independent
checks of Cepheid based distance scale - Lensing and SZ effect potentially useful out to
very large distances
54Size of the Universe (I)
- Size of the Earth
- radius 6370 km
- Eratosthenes (200 B.C.)
- Size of the solar system
- several billion km
- rough idea Aristarchus (250 B.C.)
- detailed layout 1750
55Size of the Universe (II)
- Distance to the stars
- until 1838 far away
- Bessel (1838) measured the first parallax of a
star (61 Cygni). Result 0.3 - So how far is 61 Cygni ? Recall d D ? q
- d diameter of Earths orbit (149.7 million km)
- D distance of 61 Cygni
- q parallax (0.3)
56Distance of 61 Cygni
- So lets plug in numbers ...
- But dont forget to transform angles into radians
!!! - 0.3 0.3/3600 8.3?10-5 º
- into radians 8.3?10-5 º ? ?/180 1.45 ?10-6
- put into formula D 149.7 ?106 km/1.45 ?10-6
? 1014 km - for comparison 1 light year (Ly) 1 Ly 300
000 km/s ? 86400 s/d ? 365 d/yr 9.5 ?1012 km
57Astronomers favorite length unit
1 parsec (1pc) is the distance that produces a
parallax shift of 1 or 1 parsec (1pc) is the
distance under which the radius of the Earths
orbit around the Sun spans an angle of 1
- Distance in pc 1/parallax in
- 1 pc 3.26 Ly
58Shape and Size of the Milky Way
- 1600 Galileo MW collection of stars
- 1750 Immanuel Kant, Thomas WrightMW is a disk
- 1780 Herschel counted stars in 700 fields
around the sky MW is flattened 41, Sun is near
the centerbut is it ?
59Size of the Milky Way
- Kapteyn (1920)
- measures distances to stars in the MW
- conclusion
- MW about 5 kpc across
- Sun near the center
- Shapley (1920)
- measured distances to globular clusters
- conclusion
- MW about 100 kpc across
- Sun 20 kpc off center
Solution ???
60Nature of spiral nebulae ?
- Curtis
- MW is 10 kpc across
- Sun near center
- spiral nebulae were other galaxies
- high recession speed
- apparent sizes of nebulae
- did not believe van Maanens measurement
- ? Milky Way one galaxy among many others
- Shapley
- MW is 100 kpc across
- Sun off center
- spiral nebulae part of the Galaxy
- apparent brightness of nova in the Andromeda
galaxy - measured rotation of spirals (via proper motion)
by van Maanen - ? Milky Way Universe
61Solution I
- Role of dust
- obscuration Kapteyn/Curtis could only see a
small fraction of the Milky Way disk - dimming stars appear to be dimmer ? Shapley,
ignoring dust, concluded that globular clusters
are farther away than they actually are. - ? Milky Way is 30 kpc across, Sun is 8.5 kpc off
center.
62(No Transcript)
63Solution II
- Van Maanens observation (rotation of spiral
nebulae) turned out to be wrong. - There is a difference between novae and
supernovae, supernovae are much brighter?
Andromeda is farther away than anticipated by
Shapley - ? Spiral nebulae are galaxies like the Milky
Way. Distance millions of parsec.
64Limits on the Age of the Universe (I)
Age of the Earth
- Before 1670 little attention, but common
perception that the Earth is young - 1669 Nicolaus Steno older rocks below, younger
rocks above. Layering of rocks ? age sequence - 1800 Realization that Earth may be very old
- 1858 Wallace and Darwin Evolution of species ?
Earth must be very old (hundreds of million of
years)
65Limits on the Age of the Universe (II)
Age of the Earth/Sun
- Problem in the 19 century, the Sun was believed
to be only 100 million years old (it would run
out of fuel otherwise) - Solution nuclear fusion (Eddington-Bethe-Weizsäck
er 1930s) - Today radioactive dating of rocks ? Earth (and
solar system) is 4.6 billion years old - Later in these lectures age of the universe 14
billion years
66Lets come back to Newtons Universe
- In order to avoid collapse
- homogeneous
- isotropic
- infinite size
- no center
- Infinite in time
- has always been
- will always be
- ? perfect cosmological principle!
67The cosmological principle
- Homogeneous the universe looks the same
everywhere on large scales? there is no special
place (center) - Isotropic the universe looks the same in all
directions on the sky - ? there is no special direction (axis)
68The perfect cosmological principle
- Homogeneous the universe looks the same
everywhere on large scales? there is no special
place (center) - Isotropic the universe looks the same in all
directions on the sky? there is no special
direction (axis) - Unchanging The universe looks the same at all
times ? there is no special epoch
69Homogeneity and Isotropy
Copernican Principle
?
Isotropy
Homogeneity
Isotropy around another point
?
Isotropy
Homogeneity
70Does the cosmological principle apply to our
universe ?
The cosmic microwave background radiation
(CMB) afterglow from the big bang. Its smooth
to 1 part in 105
? Yes, the universe appears to be
homogeneous and isotropic!
71Does the strong cosmological principle apply to
our universe ?
Galaxies 10 billion years ago
Galaxies today
? no, the universe appears to change with time
72Problems with an infinite universe
- Olbers Paradox Why is the night sky dark?
73Problems with an infinite universe
- Olbers Paradox Why is the night sky dark?
Each shell contributes L1 4? ? r12?x
l infinite number of shells ? infinite
luminosity
74How to solve Olbers paradox ?
- Universe is finite
- Universe has finite age
- The distribution of stars throughout space is not
uniform - The wavelength of radiation increases with time.
- Note for the big bang model, all these
conditions are satisfied
75Break!
76Two clouds on the horizon of 19th century physics
- Michelson-Morley result
- Thermal radiation of hot bodies (so-called black
body radiation)
77Einsteins new relativity
- Galileo
- The laws of mechanics are the same in all
inertial frames of reference - time and space are the same in all inertial
frames of reference - Einstein
- The laws of physics are the same in all inertial
frames of reference - the speed of light in the vacuum is the same in
all inertial frames of reference - ? time spans and distances are relative
78Doppler effect
The light of an approaching source is shifted to
the blue, the light of a receding source is
shifted to the red.
red shift
blue shift
79Doppler effect
redshift z0 not moving z2 v0.8c z? vc
80Some open problems of special relativity
- How to deal with accelerations ?
- How to deal with gravity ?
- Newtons gravity acts instantaneously, i.e. it is
inconsistent with special relativitys conclusion
that information cannot be communicated faster
than the speed of light. - Distance is relative, so which distance to use in
computing the gravitational force ?
81General relativity
- Mass tells space how to curve
- Space tells mass how to move
82The entire Universe in one line
83Some effects predicted by the theory of general
relativity
- Gravity bends light
- Gravitational redshift
- Gravitational time dilation
- Gravitational length contraction
84Consequences of the equivalenceprinciple mass
bends light
Equivalence principle Accelerated frame is
equivalent to a frame subjected to gravity
Outside Observer
85Examples for light bending
86Examples for light bending
Einstein Cross - G22370305
87Examples for light bending
88How to find out that space is not flat?
89How to find out that space is not flat?
90In flat space
?
?
?
??? 180º
91In curved space
??? ? 180º
92Euclidean (flat) geometry
- Given a line and a point not on the line, only
one line can be drawn through that point that
will be parallel to the first line - The circumference of a circle of radius r is 2? r
- The three angles of a triangle sum up to 180?
93Spherical geometry
- Given a line and a point not on the line, no
line can be drawn through that point that will be
parallel to the first line - The circumference of a circle of radius r is
smaller than 2? r - The three angles of a triangle sum up to more
than 180?
94Hyperbolic geometry
- Given a line and a point not on the line, an
infinite number of lines can be drawn through
that point that will be parallel to the first
line - The circumference of a circle of radius r is
larger than 2? r - The three angles of a triangle sum up to less
than 180?
95(No Transcript)
96The Standard Model of Cosmology
97Lets apply Einsteins equation to the Universe
- What is the solution of Einsteins equation for a
homogeneous, isotropic mass distribution? - As in Newtonian dynamics, gravity is always
attractive - A homogeneous, isotropic and initially static
universe is going to collapse under its own
gravity - Alternative expanding universe (Friedmann)
98Einsteins proposal cosmological constant ?
- There is a repulsive force in the universe
- vacuum exerts a pressure
- empty space is curved rather than flat
- The repulsive force compensates the attractive
gravity ? static universe is possible - but such a universe turns out to be unstable
one can set up a static universe, but it simply
does not remain static - Einstein greatest blunder of his life, but is
it really ?
99The quantum vacuum acts like a gas of negative
pressure!
100Edwin Hubble (1889-1953)
- Four major accomplishments
- in extragalactic astronomy
- The establishment of the Hubble classification
scheme of galaxies - The convincing proof that galaxies are island
universes - The distribution of galaxies in space
- The discovery that the universe is expanding
101The Hubble tuning fork
102The Hubble tuning fork
- Elliptical galaxies (E0-E7)
- classified according to their flattening
10?(1-b/a) - Spiral galaxies (S0, Sa-Sd)
- classified according to their bulge-to-disk ratio
- Sa large bulge, Sd small bulge
- S0 transition spiral to elliptical
- Barred spiral galaxies (SB0, SBa-SBd)
- classified according to their bulge to disk ratio
- Irregular galaxies (Irr)
103Again The Doppler effect
redshift z0 not moving z2 v0.8c z? vc
104The redshift-distance relation
105A modern Hubble diagram
106Key results
- Most galaxies are moving away from us
- The recession speed v is larger for more distant
galaxies. The relation between recess velocity v
and distance d fulfills a linear relation
v H0 ? d - Hubbles measurement of the constant H0
H0 500 km/s/Mpc - Todays best fit value of the constant
H0 72 km/s/Mpc
107Question
- If all galaxies are moving away from us,
- does this imply that we are at the center?
Answer
- Not necessarily, it also can indicate that the
- universe is expanding and that we are at no
- special place.
108So why was Hubbles original measurement so far
off ?
- Distance measurement based on the
period-luminosity relation of Cepheid stars - What are Cepheids? They are variable pulsating
stars
109So why was Hubbles original measurement so far
off ?
- There exists a luminosity-period relation for
Cepheid stars
110So why was Hubbles original measurement so far
off ?
- there are two populations of Cepheids (but Hubble
was not aware of that) - type I metal rich stars (disk of galaxies)
- type II metal poor stars (halo of galaxies)
- type II Cepheids (W Virginis) are less luminous
than type I Cepheids (d Cephei)
111initial distance 1 length unit final
distance 2 length units recess velocity
1 length unit per time unit
initial distance 2 length units final
distance 4 length units recess velocity
2 length units per time unit
112Consequence
- Distance scale was calibrated based on type II
Cepheids - Distances to other galaxies were measured using
type I Cepheids - yard stick was systematically to small
113How old is the universe ? (III)
- A galaxy at distance d recedes at velocity vH0 ?
d. - When was the position of this galaxy identical to
that of our galaxy? Answer
tHubble Hubble time.
For H0 72 km/s/Mpc tHubble
14 Gyr
114How big is the universe? (III)
- We cant tell. We can only see (and are affected
by) that part of the universe that is closer than
the distance that light can travel in a time
corresponding to the age of the Universe - But we can estimate, how big the observable
universe is
dHubble Hubble radius. For H0 72
km/s/Mpc dHubble 4.2 Gpc
115The great synthesis (1930)
- Meeting by Einstein, Hubble and Lemaître
- Einstein theory of general relativity
- Friedmann and Lemaître expanding universe as a
solution to Einsteins equation - Hubble observational evidence that the universe
is indeed expanding - Consequence
- Universe started from a point? The Big Bang
Model !
116A metric of an expanding Universe
- Recall flat space
- better using spherical coordinates (r,?,?)
117A metric of an expanding Universe
- But, this was for a static space. How does this
expression change if we consider an expanding
space ? - R(t) is the so-called scale factor
118A metric of an expanding Universe
- Robertson-Walker metric
- R(t) is the scale factor
- k is the curvature constant
- k0 flat space
- kgt0 spherical geometry
- klt0 hyperbolic geometry
119A metric of an expanding Universe
- But, so far, we only considered a flat space.
What, if there is curvature ? - k is the curvature constant
- k0 flat space
- kgt0 spherical geometry
- klt0 hyperbolic geometry
kgt0
klt0
k0
120Cosmological redshift
- While a photon travels from a distance source to
an observer on Earth, the Universe expands in
size from Rthen to Rnow. - Not only the Universe itself expands, but also
the wavelength of the photon ?.
121Cosmological redshift
- General definition of redshift? for
cosmological redshift
122Cosmological redshift
- Examples
- z1 ? Rthen/Rnow 0.5
- at z1, the universe had 50 of its present day
size - emitted blue light (400 nm) is shifted all the
way through the optical spectrum and is received
as red light (800 nm) - z4 ? Rthen/Rnow 0.2
- at z4, the universe had 20 of its present day
size - emitted blue light (400 nm) is shifted deep into
the infrared and is received at 2000 nm - most distant astrophysical object discovered so
far z6.4
123(SDSS image taken in October 2003)
124A large redshift z implies ...
- The spectrum is strongly shifted toward red or
even infrared colors - The object is very far away
- We see the object at an epoch when the universe
was much younger than the present day universe - most distant astrophysical object discovered so
far z 6.4 - z gt 6.4 dark ages
125Break!
126Can we calculate R(t) ?
127Can we calculate R(t) ?
128What is the future of that galaxy ?
- Critical velocity escape speed
- vltvesc galaxy eventually stops and falls back
- vgtvesc galaxy will move away forever
129Lets rewrite that a bit ...
- ??lt0 ? vltvesc galaxy eventually stops and falls
back - ??gt0 ? vgtvesc galaxy will move away forever
130Lets rewrite that a bit ...
- Homogeneous sphere of density ?
- so for the velocity
- but what is ?? ?
131Lets switch to general relativity
- Friedmann equation
- same k as in the Robertson-Walker metric
132Lets switch to general relativity
- Friedmann equation
- k is the curvature constant
- k0 flat space, forever expanding
- kgt0 spherical geometry, eventually recollapsing
- klt0 hyperbolic geometry, forever expanding
133Can we predict the fate of the Universe ?
134Can we predict the fate of the Universe ?
- If the density ? of the Universe
- ? ?crit flat space, forever expanding
- ? gt?crit spherical geometry, recollapsing
- ? lt ?crit hyperbolic geometry, forever expanding
- so what is the density of the universe?
- We dont know precisely
- ? gt?crit very unlikely
- currently favored model ? ? 0.3?crit
135kgt0
klt0
k0
136How big is ?crit ?
- ?crit 8?10-30 g/cm3 ? 1 atom per 200 liter
- Density parameter ?0
- ?0 1 flat space, forever expanding (open)
- ?0 gt1 spherical geometry, recollapsing (closed)
- ?0 lt1 hyperbolic geometry, forever expanding
- Currently favored model ?0 0.3
137Observational Tests and Predictions
138Observational cosmology The quest for three
numbers !
- The Hubble constant H0
- how fast is the universe expanding
- The density parameter ?0
- how much mass is in the universe
- The cosmological constant ??
- the vacuum energy of the universe
- (or the deceleration parameter q0 , which is a
combination of the others)
1391. Measuring H0
140Distances in the local universe
- Assume a linear expansion (Hubble law)
vczH0D - Use the distance modulus
m-M5log(D/10pc)-5 - Distances of a standard candle (Mconst.)
m5log(z)b
b M255log(c)-5log(H0)
141Expanding Photosphere Method
- Baade (1926), Schmidt et al. (1993), Eastman et
al. (1996), Hamuy et al. (2001) - Assume homologous expansion R(t)R0v(t-t0)
- Photometric angular diameter
142Distances from EPM
(SN 1999em, Hamuy et al. 2001)
Slope gives the distance Intercept the size of
the progenitor and/or time of explosion
143Distances from EPM
- Note that this distance measurement is completely
independent of any other astronomical object! - no distance ladder
- Assumption
- massive envelope that creates a photosphere
- spherical symmetry
- not true for many core collapse supernovae
- correction factors for deviation from black body
spectrum - model dependent
144EPM so far
- Limitations
- needs large and extensive data sets
- difficulties to get into the Hubble flow
- distances only to galaxies with supernovae
- difficult to build large sample
- Promise
- completely independent distance measurements
- checks on the Cepheid distance scale
145Distances with Type Ia Supernovae
- Use the Hubble diagram (m-M vs. log z)
- m-M5log(z)255log(c)-5log(H0)
- Note that the slope is given here.
- Hubble constant can be derived when the absolute
luminosity M is known - logH0log(z)5log(c)-0.2(m-M)
146Hubble constant from SNe Ia
- Calibrate the absolute luminosity
- through Cepheids
- classical distance ladder
- depends on the accuracy of the previous rungs on
the ladder - LMC distance, P-L(-C) relation, metallicities
- HST program (Sandage, Tammann)
- HST Key Programme (Freedman, Kennicutt, Mould,
Madore) - through models
- extremely difficult (but possible!)
147Absolute Magnitudes of SNe Ia
(Saha et al. 1999)
148Testing the SNe Ia as distance indicators
- Hubble diagram of SNe Ia in the local, linear
expansion, Hubble flow - Calibration through primary distance indicators
- Theoretical models
149Nearby SNe Ia
Phillips et al. (1999)
150Light curve shape luminosity
- ?m15 relation
- Phillips (1993), Hamuy et al. (1996), Phillips et
al. (1999) - MLCS
- Riess et al. (1996, 1998), Jha et al. (2003)
- stretch
- Perlmutter et al. (1997, 1999), Goldhaber et al.
(2001) - MAGIC
- Wang et al. (2003)
151The principles of light-curve calibrations
(Goldhaber et al. 2001)
152The SN Ia luminosity can be normalised Bright
slow Dim fast
(Riess et al. 1996)
153Correlations
154Normalisation of the peak luminosity
- Using the luminosity-decline rate relation one
can normalise the peak luminosity of SNe Ia
Reduces the scatter!
155The nearby SN Ia sample
Evidence for good distances
156Hubble constant from SNe Ia
- Extremely good (relative) distance indicators
- distance accuracy better than 10
- Uncertainty in H0 mostly from the LMC and the
Cepheid P-L relation - Todays best value (Cepheids SNe Ia)
H0 (72 7) km/s/Mpc
1572. Measuring O0 and q0
158How can we measure ?0 ?
- Count all the mass we can see
- tricky, some of the mass may be hidden
- Measure the rate at which the expansion of the
universe is slowing down - a more massive universe will slow down faster
- Measure the geometry of the universe
- is it spherical, hyperbolic or flat ?
- (Most accurate I will come back to this later
in connection with the CMB)
159Lets try to measure the deceleration
- Acceleration according to Newton
- Deceleration parameter
160So whats the meaning of q0 ?
- Deceleration parameter q0
- q0gt0.5 deceleration is so strong that
eventually the universe stops expanding
and starts collapsing - 0ltq0lt0.5 deceleration is too weak to
stop - the expansion
- Whats the difference between q0, ?0 and k ?
- k curvature of the universe
- ?0 mass content of the universe
- q0 kinematics of the universe
161So lets measure q0 !
- How do we do that?
- Measure the rate of expansion at different times,
i.e. measure and compare the expansion based on
nearby galaxies and based on high redshift
galaxies or other objects, e.g., Type Ia
supernovae. - Gravity is slowing down expansion ? expansion
rate should be higher at high redshift.
162So lets measure q0 !
q0 0
q0 0.5
Data indicates q0 lt 0 ? Expansion is
accelerating
fainter
more distant
163Science discovery of the year 1998
- The expansion of the universe is accelerating !!!
- But gravity is always attractive, so it only can
decelerate - ? Revival of the cosmological constant ?
164Friedmanns equation for ?gt0
- k is the curvature constant
- k0 flat space, flat universe
- kgt0 spherical geometry, closed universe
- klt0 hyperbolic geometry, open universe
- k is the curvature constant
- k0 flat space
- kgt0 spherical geometry
- klt0 hyperbolic geometry
- but for sufficiently large ? a spherically curved
universe may expand forever
165Deceleration parameter q for ?gt0
166The fate of the Universe for ?gt0
Mean distance between galaxies
time
167Is the fate of the Universe well determined ?
- deceleration
- ½?0 ?? gt 0 decelerating
- ½?0 ?? lt 0 accelerating
- curvature
- ?0 ?? 1 flat
- ?0 ?? lt 1 hyperbolic
- ?0 ?? gt 1 spherical
- two equations for two variables ? well posed
problem (for constant ?)
168Recent supernova data
169Very high redshift SNe Ia
170The outcome
171Observational cosmology the quest for three
numbers !
- The Hubble constant H0
- how fast is the universe expanding
- The density parameter ?0
- how much mass is in the universe
- The cosmological constant ??
- the vacuum energy of the universe
- Current observational situation
- H0 72 km/s/Mpc
- ?0 0.3 ?? 0.7 ? flat space
172How old is the Universe?
- We had
- A galaxy at distance d recedes at velocity vH0 ?
d. - When was the position of this galaxy identical to
that of our galaxy? Answer
- tHubble Hubble time. For H0 72 km/s/Mpc
tHubble 13.5 Gyr
173The age of the Universe revisited
- So far, we have assumed that the expansion
velocity is not changing (q00, empty universe) - How does this estimate change, if the expansion
decelerates, i.e. q0gt0 ?
- An ?0gt0, ?0 universe is younger than 14 Gyr
174The age of the Universe revisited
- So far, we only have considered decelerating
universes - How does this estimate change, if the expansion
accelerates, i.e. q0lt0 ?
- An ?gt0 universe can be older than 14 Gyr
175The age of the Universe revisited
- ?00, ?0 tHubble 1/H0 14 Gyr
- ?01, ?0 tHubble 2/(3H0) 10 Gyr
- Open universes with 0lt?0lt1, ?0 are between 10
and 14 Gyr old - Closed universes with ?0gt1, ?0 are less than 10
Gyr old - ?gt0 increases, ?lt0 decreases the age of the
universe - ?00.3, ?0.7 tHubble 0.96/H0 13.7 Gyr
176Can we measure the age of the Universe ?
- Not directly
- But we can constrain the age of the Universe. It
must not be younger than the oldest star in the
Universe. - How do we measure the age of stars?
- radioactive dating
- stellar evolution models
- Result age of the oldest star 12-14 Gyr
- In excellent agreement with ? gt 0 cosmology!
177The life of a universe some key facts
- Unless ? is sufficiently large (which is
inconsistent with observations) all cosmological
models start with a big bang. - An universe doesnt change its geometry. A flat
universe has always been and will always be flat,
a spherical universe is always spherical and so
on. - Two basic solutions
- eventual collapse for large ?0 or negative ?
- eternal expansion otherwise
178Some common misconceptions
- The picture that the Universe expands into a
preexisting space like an explosion - The question what was before the big bang?
- Remember spacetime is part of the solution to
Einsteins equation - Space and time are created in the big bang
179So is the big crunch the same as the big bang run
in reverse ?
- No. The Universe has meanwhile formed stars,
black holes, galaxies etc. - Second law of thermodynamicsThe entropy
(disorder) of a system at best stays the same but
usually increases with time, in any process.
There is no perpetual motion machine. - Second law of thermodynamics defines an arrow of
time.
180Friedmanns equation for ?0, ?0lt1
- At early epochs, the first term dominates
- the early universe appears to be almost flat
- At late epochs, the second term dominates
- the late universe appears to be almost empty
181Friedmanns equation for ?gt0, ?0lt1
- At early epochs, the first term dominates
- the early universe appears to be almost flat
- At late epochs, the third term dominates
- the late universe appears to be exponentially
expanding
182A puzzling detail
- ?0 for most of its age, the universe looks
either to be flat or to be empty - ?gt0 for most of its age, the universe looks
either to be flat or to be exponentially
expanding - Isnt it strange that we appear to live in that
short period between those two extremes - gt Flatness problem !
183Break!
1843. The cosmic microwave background
185General acceptance of the big bang model
- Until mid 60ies big bang model very
controversial, many alternative models - After mid 60ies little doubt on validity of the
big bang model - Four pillars on which the big bang theory is
resting - Hubbles law ?
- Cosmic microwave background radiation ?
- The origin of the elements
- Structure formation in the universe
186Georgy Gamov (1904-1968)
- If the universe is expanding, then there has
been a big bang - Therefore, the early universe must have been
very dense and hot - Optimum environment to breed the elements by
nuclear fusion (Alpher, Bethe Gamow, 1948) - success predicted that helium abundance is 25
- failure could not reproduce elements more
massive than lithium and beryllium (? formed in
stars)
187What are the consequences ?
- In order to form hydrogen and helium at the right
proportions, the following conditions are
required - density ? ? 10-5 g/cm-3
- temperature T ? 109 K
- Radiation from this epoch should be observable as
an isotropic background radiation - Due to the expansion of the universe to ? ?
3?10-30 g/cm3, the temperature should have
dropped to T ? 5 K (-268 C) - Can we observe this radiation ?
188The discovery of the relic radiation
- Gamovs result on the background radiation was
not well recognized by the scientific community - Result was rediscovered by Dicke and Peebles in
the early sixties. They started developing an
antenna to search for the background radiation - T ? 5 K ? microwaves
- but
189Penzias and Wilson 1965
- Working at Bell labs
- Used a satellite dish to measure radio emission
of the Milky Way - They found some extra noise in the receiver, but
couldnt explain it? discovery of the background
radiation - Most significant cosmological observation since
Hubble - Nobel prize for physics 1978
190A quote ...
- John Bahcall "The discovery of the cosmic
microwave background radiation changed forever
the nature of cosmology, from a subject that had
many elements in common with theology to a
fantastically exciting empirical study of the
origins and evolution of the things that populate
the physical universe."
191How far can we see ?
- Naked eye 2 million Lyr (Andromeda galaxy)
- Large telescopes 13 billion Lyr (z 6.4)
- What are the limiting factors ?
- there are no bright sources at high z
- light is redshifted into the infrared
- absorption
- The universe appears to be fairly transparent out
to z 6.4
192When does a gas become opaque?
- A gas appears opaque (e.g. fog) if light is
efficiently scattered by the atoms/molecules of
the gasThe three important factors are thus - the density of the gas (denser ? more particles
? more scattering) - the efficiency with which each individual
particle can scatter light - wavelength of the light
193The transition from a transparent to an opaque
universe
- At z0 the universe is fairly transparent
- At higher z, the universe becomes denser (?
?0?(1z)3) and hotter (TT0?(1z)) - At z1100, the universe is so dense that its
temperature exceeds 3000K. In a fairly sharp
transition, the universe becomes completely
ionized and opaque to visible light. (last
scattering surface) - At z1100, the universe is 300 000 yrs old
194 Before recombination The Universe is
opaque After recombination The Universe is
transparent Transition 300 000 years after
the Big Bang
195Last scattering surface
transparent
opaque
196Black body radiation
- A hot body is brighter than a cool one (L?T4,
Stefan-Boltzmanns law) - A hot bodys spectrum is bluer than that of a
cool one (?max?1/T, Wiens law)
197The cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB)
- Temperature of 2.7280.004 K
- Isotropic to 1 part in 100 000
- Perfect black body
- 1990ies CMB is one of the major tools to study
cosmology - Note 1 of the noise in your TV is from the big
bang
198Nobel Price in Physics 2006 for COBE
John Mather
George Smoot
199Should the CMB be perfectly smooth ?
- No. Todays Universe is homogeneous and isotropic
on the largest scales, but there is a fair amount
of structure on small scales, such as galaxies,
clusters of galaxies etc.
200Should the CMB be perfectly smooth ?
- We expect some wriggles in the CMB radiation,
corresponding to the seeds from which later on
galaxies grow
201(No Transcript)
202The Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) (1989 -
1993)
- Main objectives
- To accurately measure the temperature of the CMB
- To find the expected fluctuations in the CMB
203(No Transcript)
204Main results from COBE
205Interpretation of the results from the COBE)
- The Earth is moving with respect to the CMB ?
Doppler shift - The emission of the Galaxy
- Fluctuations in the CMB
206The BOOMERANG mission
- COBE was a satellite mission, why ?
- Measure at mm and sub-mm wavelengths
- Earth atmosphere almost opaque at those
wave-lengths due to water vapor - satellite missions take a long time and are
expensive - What can be done from the ground ?
- Balloon experiment
- Desert ? South Pole
207The BOOMERANG mission (2000)
208The BOOMERANG mission
209Where do the CMB fluctuations come from ?
- Wrinkles some regions have a slightly higher
gravity, some a slightly lower (potential
wells) - Matter falls into potential wells
210How can we measure the geometry of the universe ?
- We need a yard stick on the CMB
- For different curvatures, a yard stick of given
length appears under different angles
211Measuring the Curvature of the Universe Using the
CMB
Result from Boomerang The Universe is flat to
within 10!
212(No Transcript)
213Measuring the Curvature of the Universe Using the
CMB
- Recall with supernovae, one measures q0 ½?0
?? - CMB fluctuations measure curvature? ?0 ??
- two equations for two variables? problem solved
214Present and future missions
Planck
WMAP
215Results from WMAP
216Can we see the sound of the universe ?
- Compressed gas heats up? temperature
fluctuations
217Interpretation of the data
Geometry of the Universe flat
(Euklidian) Dark Energy 70 Dark Matter
26 Baryons 4 Age of the Universe 14 Billion
years (Uncertainties lt 5)
2184. Primordial nucleosynthesis
219General acceptance of the big bang model
- Until mid 60ies big bang model very
controversial, many alternative models - After mid 60ies little doubt on validity of the
big bang model - Four pillars on which the big bang theory is
resting - Hubbles law ?
- Cosmic microwave background radiation
- The origin of the elements
- Structure formation in the universe
- Until mid 60ies big bang model very
controversial, many alternative models - After mid 60ies little doubt on validity of the
big bang model - Four pillars on which the big bang theory is
resting - Hubbles law ?
- Cosmic microwave background radiation ?
- The origin of the elements ?
- Structure formation in the universe
220Georgy Gamov (1904-1968)
- If the universe is expanding, then there has
been a big bang - Therefore, the early universe must have been
very dense and hot - Optimum environment to breed the elements by
nuclear fusion (Alpher, Bethe Gamow, 1948) - success predicted that helium abundance is 25
- failure could not reproduce elements more
massive than lithium and beryllium (? formed in
stars)
221The structure of matter
222Nomenclature
or
- Z number of protons
- A number of nucleons (protons and neutrons)
- N number of neutrons (A-Z)
- X name of the element
223Abundances of elements
- Hydrogen and helium most abundant
- gap around Li, Be, B
224Thermal history of the universe
- When the universe was younger than 300 000 yrs,
it was so hot that neutral atoms separated into
nuclei and electrons. It was too hot to bind
atomic nuclei and electrons to atoms by the
electromagnetic force - When the universe was younger than 1 sec, it
was so hot that atom nuclei separated into
neutrons and protons. It was too hot to bind
protons and neutrons to atomic nuclei by the
strong nuclear force
225Formation of helium in the big bang
- Hydrogen 1 nucleon (proton)
- Helium 4 nucleons (2 protons, 2 neutrons)
- In order to from helium from hydrogen one has to
- bring 2 protons and 2 neutrons close together, so
the strong nuclear force can act and hold them
together - close together Coulomb repulsion has to be
overcome ? high velocities ? high temperatures - but 4 body collisions are highly unlikely
226Transforming hydrogen into helium
- Hot big bang neutrons and protons
- Use a multi step procedure
- p n ? 2H
- p 2H ? 3He
- n 2H ? 3H
- 3He 3He ? 4He 2 p
- some side reactions
- 4He 3H ? 7Li
- 4He 3He ? 7Be
227Mass gap/stability gap at A5 and 8