Title: Economics and Sustainability
1Economics and Sustainability
- Lisa Morris, Ph.D.
- Assistant Professor
- Muskie School of Public Service
2Teaching Sustainability Through Economics, and
Teaching Economics Through Sustainability
- Use sustainability model as a framework for
teaching and evaluating neoclassical
microeconomic theory and its assumptions. - Use sustainability model as a framework for
evaluating market-based policy proposals. - Use economics to evaluate the sustainability
model and policy proposals that seek to achieve
sustainability objectives.
3The Limits of Growth China, choking on its own
success.
- New York Times, Aug. 26, 2007 No country in
history has emerged as a major industrial power
without creating a legacy of environmental damage
that can take decades and big dollops of public
wealth to undo. But just as the speed and scale
of Chinas rise as an economic power have no
clear parallel in history, so its pollution
problem has shattered all precedents.
Environmental degradation is now so severe..
Politicallyit is not clear that China can rein
in its own economic juggernaut. Public health is
reeling. Pollution has made cancer Chinas
leading cause of death, the Ministry of Health
says. Ambient air pollution alone is blamed for
hundreds of thousands of deaths each year. Nearly
500 million people lack access to safe drinking
water.China is choking on its own success
4The Limits of Growth Case of China
- Large population and govt efforts to control
growth - Double-digit economic growth rates
- Energy-intensive growth
- heavy industry, urbanization, cars
- Inefficient energy use
- Coal (cheap but dirty)
- relying on less-efficient, but cheaper,
technology - heavy traffic and low-grade gasoline
5The Limits of Growth Case of China
- The benefits of growth
- less poverty (at least in the aggregate)
- The costs of growth
- severe air and water pollution
- rising disease and health care costs
- social unrest linked to unequal distribution of
costs and benefits of rapid growth - increasing costs of doing business
6The dismal science, sustainability, and
hope-based teaching and learning
- Discuss Success Stories.
- Show how change-making can be fun.
- Remind them that there is still love, chocolate
and puppies.
7Structure of Course Microeconomics and Policy
- How the market works (at least in theory)
- What the market does relatively well
- What the market does poorly
8How the Market Works (at least in theory)
- Supply and Demand
- Profits are maximized when production level is
set to where PMC (when PgtMC the firm enjoys
super non-zero economic profits) - Utility is maximized when consumers purchase to
the point where MUP (when MUgtP the consumer
enjoys CS) - When PMC and MUP ? MUMC (most
efficientwell-being is maximized) - The Price Mechanism
- High prices discourage consumption of scarce
resources - Low prices encourage consumption of abundant
resources - Shortage (DgtS) the market mechanism pushes P up,
thereby encouraging more production and less
consumption - Surplus (DltS) the market mechanism pushes P
down, thereby discouraging more production and
encouraging more consumption - Perfect Competition
- Eliminates non-zero economic (super) profits
(PMCAC) - Encourages innovation (new, efficiency-enhancing
technologies)
9What the market does relatively well
- The price system automatically coordinates
millions of interconnected economic activities
(i.e., little-to-no central planning required). - Meets consumer demand at minimum cost, at least
for certain commodities (many durables and some
services) and thus maximizes well-being (by
maxing net gain benefits from outputsgtcosts of
inputs). - Creates incentives for innovation, investment,
enterprise and hard work. - Results in big growth in productivity and per
capita incomes and increased variety of
goods/services.
10What the market does poorly
- Business cycle fluctuations
- Distributes income and goods unequally
- Markets fail (monopoly, externalities, moral
hazard, imperfect information, principal-agent
problems, rent seeking) - Cant readily provide public (non-rival
consumption and non-excludable) goods - Misallocates of resources between present and
future - Market mechanism makes public and personal
services (health, education) increasingly
expensive
11Sustainability Model
- Sustainability seeks to balance three things
- Economic growth/development/well-being
- Ecological/environmental protection/preservation
- Socioeconomic equity/equality
12Economics and Sustainability
- Neoclassical (mainstream) Economics
- Under prefect conditions, market forces of S D
get the prices of inputs and outputs right and
therefore allocate scarce resources efficiently
(in such a way as to maximize well-being while
minimizing costs) - Even under less-than-perfect conditions, the
market still scores higher (than government
intervention, especially regulation) on
efficiency - Environmental Economics
- Market failures
- Calculation of the impact of environmental
degradation and the pricing of environmental
services - Determination of efficient levels of pollution
control - CBA of pollution solutions and conservation
efforts - Market-based solutions to control pollution and
natural resource depletion - Ecological (green) Economics
- Efficient allocation of resources
- Scale issues/limits to growth/carrying capacity
and tipping points - Growth versus development (improvement in quality
of life) - Equity and the distribution of well-being
13Challenging Market Efficiency
- Imperfect Competition
- inefficient use of inputs not punished by market
forces - Market Failures
- prices are wrong and so the market cant allocate
resources efficiently - Utility maximization assumption
- market efficiency claims start with the
assumption that consumers are maximizing their
utility. If they are not, the result is an
inefficient allocation of society resources. - Profit maximization assumption
- Some socially responsible firms accept reduced
profits in order to protect environment
14 Imperfect Competition
- Perfect competition is a theoretical ideal and
very rare in real life. - Many firms, identical goods, no entry/exit
barriers, perfect information - Competition is what forces firms to produce what
consumers want at least possible cost. - Imperfect competition ? less than efficient
allocation of resources. - Questions
- Can firms bringing new greener products to
market compete with established, larger firms? - What are the barriers to getting alternative
energy sources to market? - Could their be any advantages to monopoly market
structures?
15Market Failures
- Negative Externalities
- costs imposed on others outside buyers and
sellers - prices not right (true cost private social)
- Producer side (dumping into water, spewing into
air) - Consumer side (gas, Hummers, McMansions)
- Certain (Impure) public goods
- rival (depletable) but non-excludable (cant
prevent free riding) - tragedy of the commons
- natural resources, clean air, clean water
- Imperfect Information
- science takes longer than the market
- uncertainty and risk
- climate change debate, health effects of
pollution, current technology (remember when
plastic was the answer to all things)
16The economics of negative externality
- Definition When a party outside of the economic
exchange between consumer and producer is
impacted negatively - Profit maxing firms set output level so that MCP
(and utility-maxing consumers make sure MUP). - But, in this case, MC is not true cost
- True cost MSC MPC to producer external
costs - Since MPC lt MSC, the firm produces too much and
charges too little and so consumers buy too much
(inefficient allocation). - Therefore, smaller outputs than those that max
profits will be better for society. - Because wherever there are negative externalities
MUltMSC therefore, society benefits if the output
produced was smaller because it would lose the MU
but save the greater MSC.
17Pollution as market failure
- Pollution is a negative externality.
- The failure occurs because a firm or a consumer
is able to use up some clean air or water without
paying for the privilege. - No one has property rights to air, water and so
these resources are free. - Because it is costless, firm or consumer uses
clean air or water wastefully. - Discussion Efficiency of pollution solutions?
- Direct regulation vs. eco-taxes
- Coase Theorem and Critiques of Coase
- Coase Theorem is useful for analyzing why govt
interventions sometimes result in the more
expensive (i.e., less efficient) solution
18Utility Theory and Efficiency
- Basic theory on consumer demand
- Consumers are rational (self-interested utility
maximizers) - They spend their in such a way as to minimize
paid in order to maximize their satisfaction
(optimal purchasingMUP) - market efficiency claims start with the
assumption that consumers are maximizing utility.
If they are not, the result is an inefficient
allocation of society resources. - Discussion
- Rationality assumptions
- Imperfect information on goods/services, quality,
prices, impacts of their consumption choices - Imperfect information causes buyers to make
poor/costly decisions (PgtMU). - Goods (utility) vs bads (disutility)
- Hummer drivers are they being rational?
19Profit Maximization and Efficiency
- Economic theory on profit maximization
- firms should expand its output as long as the
added output contributes more to total revenue
than it does to total cost. - additions to TR and TC per unit of output are MR
(marginal revenue) and MC (marginal cost),
respectively. - output should optimally be set where MRMC
(occurs where TR-TCprofit is at a maximum). - Questions/Discussion
- Why do we assume that firms maximize profits when
it is easy to find companies that pursue other
goals such as protecting the environment? - Does this mean that these firms are producing at
MCgtMR? - Using economic analysis, discuss, for example,
Sillys Portland restaurant)100 percent recycling
commitment and how it might impact their
production function and their ability to maximize
profits. - Other examples of socially responsible business
practices? - Stonyfield farm Yogurt
- United for a Fair Economy
20Efficient Allocation of Resources andthe
optimal level of pollution
- Environmental damage cannot be reduced to zero
- Law of conservation of matter and energy
- Trade-Offs must be made
- Development versus the environment
- Optimal level of pollution control
- In theory, when marginal costs of abatement
marginal benefits of reduced pollution - Requires perfect knowledge of physical world and
perfect wisdom in knowing how to value things,
both present and future. - Discussion
- Wealth versus cleaner environment
- Wealth buys material comfort, safety, food,
education, health care, etc. - Jobs versus the environment
- Challenges to measuring benefits to abatement
(avoided costs of negative impacts) - Imperfect information about the negative impacts
of pollution - The new book The World Without Us
21Determinations of Efficiency and Cost Benefit
Analysis
- Usefulness of CBA
- Efficiency, cost effectiveness of policy
solutions - Valuation of environmental services (benefits)
and the costs of their depletion, degradation - Limitations and challenges to CBA
- Prediction and estimation of impacts
- Getting the prices right for costs and benefits
- Determining the boundaries of the analysis (who
and what has standing where do you stop counting
costs and benefits) - Voorhees, Scott, A. et. al., (2000) An Ex-Post
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Nitrogen Dioxide Air
Pollution Control Program in Tokyo Journal of
Air and Waste Management, Volume 50, Number 3,
pages 391-410. - Kelman, Steven (1992) Cost-Benefit Analysis An
Ethical Critique in The Moral Dimensions of
Public Policy Choice Beyond the Market Paradigm.
Pittsburgh, PA University of Pittsburgh Press.
22Tradable Pollution PermitsAssignment
- Readings
- Levy, John M (1995) Chapter 12 Selling the Right
to Pollute in Essential Microeconomics for
Public Policy Analysis. Westport, Connecticut
Praeger. - Tietenberg, Tom The Tradable-Permits Approach to
Protecting the Commons Lessons for Climate
Change by (2003) Oxford Review of Economic
Policy, Vol 19, No 3. - Controlling Global Climate The Debate over
Pollution Trading Report (Winter 1999) from the
Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy,
Maryland School of Public Affairs, University of
Maryland. www.publicpolicy.umd.edu/IPPP/winter99/c
ontrolling_global_climate.htm - The Mercury Scandal Paul Krugman, New York
Times, April 6, 2004 - Questions
- Using economic efficiency analysis, discuss and
compare the following approaches to pollution
reduction direct regulation, pollution taxes,
subsidies, and tradable pollution permits. - Critics of emissions trading argue that cap and
trade programs are a license to pollute. Using
economic theory and principles, evaluate this
argument. - While tradable permit programs generally score
well in terms of efficiency, they do less well
when it comes to equity concerns. What are the
distributional (spatial and temporal) issues with
tradable permits programs versus taxes on
pollution and direct limits on emissions? - What are some of the ways to deal with the
creation of hot spots? - Under what conditions do tradable permit
approaches work best (at reducing pollution and
at lower cost than other policy approaches)?
Under what conditions might tradable permits not
be the best policy?
23Limits to GrowthDiscussion Questions
- Are consumption-based economies sustainable?
- Is the problem over-population or
over-consumption? - What about Chinas population control efforts?
- Is green consumption sustainable?
- How do markets deal with non-renewable resources?
- How does economics explain over-fishing and
empty-sea predictions? - What are the implications of declining oil
supplies? Are we now starting to run out of oil?
Is the strategic oil reserve efficient?
24Are consumption-based economies sustainable?
- .our enormously productive economydemands that
we make consumption a way of life.. (1950,
market analyst Victor Lebow) - Discuss
- planned (built-in) obsolescence and short-lived
products - What would happen if we all reduced our
consumption? - Recession fears, jobs vs environment
- Will green consumption be sustainable?
- Use economics to evaluate
- Live simply so that others may simply live
- Consume less, share more
- Bonos Buy (RED) campaign
25Is the problem over-population or
over-consumption?
- Currently there are 1.7 billion members of the
consumer class and our environment is suffering. - What happens if even 50 of the projected 9
billion global residents enter the consumer
class? - Reading assignment State of the World 2004 The
Consumer Society. The World Watch Institute.
26Top 10 Natl Consumer Class Populations (2002)
27Foot Print Assignment
- Using the carbon calculator and the ecological
footprint, calculate the impact of your
consumption choices on the environment. - http//www.myfootprint.org/
- http//www.nature.org/initiatives/climatechange/ca
lculator/ - http//sustainability.publicradio.org/consumercons
equences/ - How do you rank compared to the average American?
The average global citizen? - Discuss your consumption patterns. How do you
make the biggest impact on the environment? - What kinds of things do you currently do to
reduce your footprint? - Discuss the methodology and data used to
calculate foot prints. Do they seem reliable
and accurate? Are there items that are not
included, data that is not collected, that you
think should be, that might make footprint
calculations more accurate (be specific, give
examples)?
28What about Chinas Population Control Efforts?
- The costs of over-population were (and continue
to be) huge - Chinas policies (begun in 1970s) have
successfully reduced pop growth rates (in some
areas more than others) - Discussion
- Efficiency vs liberty vs equity
- Social insurance programs
- Sex imbalances
29Reading Assignments(in addition to standard econ
text)
- Garrett Hardins The Tragedy of the Commons
- 4 additional essays responding to Hardins
original essay, including - Letters Freedom to Breed
- The Tragedy of the Commons Revisited
- Extensions of the Tragedy of the Commons, and
- Revisiting the Commons Local Lessons, Global
Challenges - Crossette, Barbara (Winter 2002/2003) Behind the
Great Wall Chinas Population Policies,
Conscience, Volume 23, Number 4. - Attane, Isabelle (2002) Chinas Family Planning
Policy An Overview of its Past and Future,
Studies in Family Planning, Volume 33, Number 1.
30Economic Theory of Natural (Nonrenewable)
Resources
- Scarcity and prices
- A reliable indicator of the availability of
depletable resources is the price of the
resource. - Theory predicts ever increasing prices of
non-renewable resources - Exhaustion of most accessible and cheapest
sources - Declining overall supply (inward shift of S
curve) - Increasing rates of consumption (outward shifting
D curves) - The virtues of rising prices
- Discourage consumption and waste.
- Provide an inducement for conservation.
- Stimulate more efficient use by industry, or the
use of substitute resources. - Induce technological innovations that use scare
resource more efficiently. - Encourage innovation, the discovery of alternate
resources, and entrepreneurial efforts to get
alternative resources to market.
31How do markets deal with non-renewable resources?
- Markets and Market Failure
- Impure Public good
- natural resources clean air, clean water, etc.
- rival (depletable) but non-excludable (cant
prevent free riding) - Positive externality
- Natural resources can also be analyzed in terms
of positive externalities - Environmental services
- Discuss
- tragedy of the commons
- over consumption, depletion (over-fishing, empty
sea predictions) - Property rights
- Policy solutions to prevent over-consumption
32Scarcity and Non-Renewable Resources
- Discussion
- Why arent prices for nonrenewable resources
always increasing (so far anyway)? - unexpected discoveries of reserves
- new inventions that increase fuel efficiency
- new methods of mining and refining
- govt price controls
- Are we starting to run out of oil?
- What are the implications of declining oil
supplies? - Is the strategic oil reserve efficient?
- What are the virtues of rising oil prices?
- Evaluate different policies to get alternative
fuels to market in terms of efficiency and
equity.
33Applying Economic Theory to Over-consumption and
the misallocation of resources between now and
future
- Question Are we over-consuming? (destruction of
irreplaceable resources, negative savings rates,
too little investment in green alternatives and
technology, ? conservation, etc.) - Because prices (interest rates) are wrong
- If investment loans are too expensive ?
investment in technology for future - If credit is too cheap (equity lines, credit
cards) ? over-consume now - Myopia and immediate need for gratification
- Self-interested individuals utility functions
dont include the utility of future people - People dont plan ahead (negative savings rates)
- Consumption therapy and materialism
- Investment has high individual risks
- Imperfect information about future
- Risk discourages investment
- If climate change predictions are right, why
bother? - Rational self-interested maximization and
free-riding - What difference does it make if I conserve if all
the other millions of people dont? What
difference does my little bit of pollution make
to the aggregate total?
34Growth versus DevelopmentDiscussion Questions
- Does growth always make us better off?
- Why arent citizens of richer countries always
happier than those of poorer countries? - What are the limitations to consumption-based
measures of well-being? - What are alternatives to consumption-based
measures of well-being?
35Cost and Benefits of Growth Case of China
- The benefits of growth
- less poverty (at least in the aggregate)
- Improved material well-being (at least for some)
- new goods/services, technology, innovations
- The costs of growth
- severe air and water pollution
- rising disease and health care costs
- social unrest linked to unequal distribution of
costs and benefits of rapid growth - increasing costs of doing business
- Discuss benefits and costs of economic
development in the U.S. context, in Maine, etc.
36Growth (quantitative) versus Development
(qualitative improvements in quality of life)
- Basic theory on well-being
- Consumers are rational utility (well-being)
maximizers - Per capita income is indicative of well-being
- More is (generally) better
- Challenges from within Economics
- The declining marginal utility of wealth
- The more you have, the less it adds to your
overall well-being - Preference formation and imperfect information
- What if consumers arent really maximizing their
utility? - Wealth vs Quality of life
- Alternatives to consumption-based measurements of
utility (Amartya Sen and Martha Nussabaum) - Economics of happiness (mixes psychology and
economics)
37Growth (quantitative) versus Development
(qualitative improvements in quality of life)
- David Cameron, the latest leader of Britain's
once rather materialistic Conservative Party, has
espoused the notion of general well-being (GWB)
as an alternative to the more traditional GDP
(The Economist, Dec. 19, 2006) - Net Domestic Product (NDP)
- Adjusted for depreciation of natural capital
- Green GDP
- Includes costs of environmental damage and human
health - Human Development Index (HDI)
- Includes qualitative and non-consumption-based
measures of well-being - Discuss
- Revealed Preference Theory
- Assumes that actual purchases are accurate
reflections of the best option and thus of
maximizing behavior (its a solution to the
inherent difficulty in directly measuring
utility). - Measurement challenges (well-being, estimating
damage, monetization of impacts) - Making comparisons with qualitative measures
- The politics when numbers are disputed (Chinas
green GDP, climate change debate)
38Why arent citizens of richer countries always
happier than those of poorer countries?
- affluenza and capitalism's wasteful materialism
- even Adam Smith had a problem with it. How many
people ruin themselves by laying out money on
trinkets of frivolous utility? he complained.
(The Economist, Dec. 19, 2006) - declining returns to wealth
- Economic theory predicts that greater wealth
leads to greater leisure. - over-consumption ? over-work
- Institutional constraints (labor laws,
organization of work, etc.)
39Equity and Distribution Discussion Questions
- Are markets fair?
- Is there a zero sum trade-off between efficiency
and equality? - If more equality is our goal, what can we do?
- Is there an efficiency argument for green
technology transfers to developing countries? - Evaluate Bonos Buy (RED) campaign.
- Discuss the distributional impacts of climate
change.
40Equity and Distribution
- Distribution of what
- Material well-being
- Costs and benefits of development
- Costs and benefits of the solutions to
environmental damage - Distribution among population segments
- rich vs poor
- developed vs less-developed countries
- now vs future
- Discuss
- the differential effects of climate change
- differential capacities to adapt
- Chinas uneven growth and growing inequality
- inequality in U.S. (Katrina)
41Are markets fair?
- The price mechanism rations goods according to
- preferences (willingness to pay the market
price) - relative incomes (ability to pay the market
price) - Therefore, markets favor the rich.
- Equity fairness
- The market favors those who have wealth (wealth
begets wealth) and this is unfair - The market punishes sloth and bad decisions and
this is fair (merit) - The market favors the lucky (talented, born into
rich family, a developed country, at right
place/right time, etc.) and this is unfair - Discuss
- equality vs equity
- merit vs luck
- merit vs privilege, oppression, discrimination
42Economics and the Trade-Off between efficiency
and equity
- Question Is the trade-off between efficiency and
equality a zero sum game? - Discuss
- Inequality is efficient it motivates work,
enterprise, and investment - The total amount of income in society is not
independent of how we try to distribute it. - Policy measures can be enacted to increase
equality, but usually at a price in terms of
total output or efficiency. - In terms of efficiency, there are better and
worse ways to pursue equality.
43Efficiency vs Equity Trade-offChallenges from
Within Economics
- The elimination of at least more severe
inequalities will actually raise not lower
aggregate utility. - If the following 3 assumptions hold
- declining marginal utility of wealth
- interpersonal comparisons of utility are
meaningful - person A will get more utility out of having a
new pair of shoes than person B will get out of
having a bowl of ice cream - people get roughly the same value out of a given
level of material well-being - person A would enjoy living the good life about
as much as B would and that A and B's respective
experiences of the bad life would be similarly
comparable. - Then transfers of wealth (sharing of economic
pie) will not be inefficient (i.e., result in a
smaller economic pie).
44Equality vs Efficiency
- Question If more equality is our goal, what can
we do? - Use tax system to redistribute wealth and close
income gap and let market distribute goods
according to preference - Discuss price controls and OPEC oil embargo.
- Why was using price controls less efficient than
taxes? - Did the controls help protect the poor from
rising gas prices? - Discuss costs to excessive inequality
- social unrest, public health, under-used (human)
resources
45Is there an efficiency argument for green
technology transfers to developing countries?
- Negative externalities (air pollution from China
? LA) - Declining marginal returns (if LDC is really
dirty and it uses green technology it will get
bigger reduction in pollution for every spent) - Declining marginal utility of wealth
- Remember, economists measure efficiency in
overall, aggregate terms - If the pain wealthy nations feel (in terms of
lowered consumption) is less than the benefits to
poor countries, then an efficiency argument can
be made for the transfer of technology to poor
countries. - Question What about assisting low-income
households in U.S. or Maine become more green?
46Efficiency and Equity
- The SOTW report said (on page 97) that "rough
calculations suggest that in order to accommodate
the twin imperatives of environmental protection
and social equity, the rich nations may need to
cut their use of materials by as much as 90
percent over the next few decades." - What do you think? Is this feasible?
- What would it be like for you to cut your
consumption by 25, 50? - Should developing countries also be required to
rein in their consumption as part of global
efforts to reduce pollution and reduce the
effects of climate change? - Use economic analysis to evaluate Bonos Buy
(RED) campaign in terms of efficiency and equity.