Generative vs' Discriminative models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Generative vs' Discriminative models

Description:

Asymptotic results for these models (Ng & Jordan) Relevance of ... Perplexity. Model. People as topics (Jain, ICCV07) Purely Generative ~25. MRF. 65.24. SHRF ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: viscs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Generative vs' Discriminative models


1
Generative vs. Discriminative models
  • Vidit Jain
  • IR Seminar (Spring 2008)

2
Readings
  • Required
  • Ng and Jordan. NIPS01
  • Nallapati. SIGIR04
  • Lafferty Zhai. Workshop on language modeling
    and IR, 2001.
  • Required Skims
  • Jain et al. CVPR08
  • Jain et al. ICCV07

3
Readings (contd.)
  • Recommended
  • Wei and Croft. RIAO07
  • Cao et al. SIGIR06
  • Raina et al. NIPS04
  • Others
  • Metzler. Tech Report, CIIR
  • Jaakkola and Hausler. NIPS98
  • Ulusoy and Bishop. CVPR05
  • Long and Servedillo. COLT06

4
Agenda
  • Asymptotic results for these models (Ng Jordan)
  • Relevance of these results in the context of IR
  • Language models as generative models (Lafferty
    Zhai)
  • Topic models (Wei)
  • Discriminative models for IR (Nallapati)
  • IR as classification
  • Is the paradigm choice task / evaluation
    dependent?
  • vision (Jain), ranking (Metzler)
  • Hybrid models

5
Ng Jordan (NIPS01)
  • Generative models have better performance than
    discriminative models for less data, but the
    asymptotic error is higher for the former.
  • Is it true for any pair of models?
  • VC-dimension of a classifier vs. the complexity
    of the problem.
  • Does smoothing change anything?

6
Relevance for IR
  • Is generative modeling always preferable for IR
    tasks ?
  • Less data
  • Can we compress representation / feature space?
  • Expansion of representation ?
  • Effect of smoothing

7
Lafferty Zhai
  • Relevance models and language models are
    probabilistically equivalent but different from
    statistical point of view.
  • Assumptions for language models
  • Dr and Qr are independent.
  • D and R are independent.
  • Independence of query terms.
  • Incorporating relevance judgments in the two
    models.

8
Wei and Croft, RIAO07
  • Vocabulary mismatch
  • User context
  • Manually-built ideal topics why is it the
    best?
  • Topic model construction
  • Results not good mostly because of the
    ideal-iness.
  • Analysis

9
Discriminative models
  • Is IR classification?
  • Reasoning for language models being generative
    not complete.
  • Benefits for discriminative
  • Expressiveness, burstiness, arbitrary features,
    relevance.
  • Results analysis
  • Is the comparison fair?

10
Paradigm choice
  • Evaluation task dependent
  • Metzlers observations
  • IR not concerned with accuracy or likelihood
  • Direct optimization of the evaluation metric

11
Task dependent (Vision papers)
People as topics (Jain, ICCV07)
Event Classification (Jain, CVPR08)
12
Hybrid models
  • Use hybrid models to use benefits of both types
    of models.
  • Time-dependent learning parameter ?
  • Over-sampling weight ?
  • Hybrid optimization functions ? (Raina, Ulusoy )
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com