Designing Adaptive Organizations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Designing Adaptive Organizations

Description:

Degree to which tasks are subdivided into individual jobs ... With extreme specialization, workers tend to become bored and alienated. Chain of Command ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:432
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: drwayne
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Designing Adaptive Organizations


1
Chapter 7
  • Designing Adaptive Organizations

2
Major Concerns in Organizing
  • Division of Labor (Differentiation)
  • Coordination (Integration)

3
In Reference to the Organizational Chart,
Organizing Involves
  • VERTICAL STRUCTURE
  • Coordination from Top to Bottom
  • HORIZONTAL STRUCTURE
  • Departmentalization
  • (Who works together?)

4
Work Specialization
  • Degree to which tasks are subdivided into
    individual jobs
  • A highly specialized job is narrow in scope
  • Increases efficiency up to a point
  • With extreme specialization, workers tend to
    become bored and alienated

5
Chain of Command
  • The line of authority, shown in the organization
    chart, that links all persons and shows who
    reports to whom.

CEO
VP Marketing
VP Production
VP Finance
6
Authority
  • Managers have authority because of the positions
    they hold (not who they are)
  • To be effective, it must be accepted by
    subordinates.
  • Responsibility
  • Duty to perform the task an employee has been
    assigned
  • Authority should be commensurate with
    responsibility.

7
Delegation
  • Process to transfer authority and responsibility
    to positions below
  • Delegation does not reduce responsibility
  • Benefits both the organization and the individual
    employee

8
Common Practice is to
  • CENTRALIZE (authority at top)
  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Human Resources Management
  • Information Systems
  • DECENTRALIZE (much delegation)
  • Production
  • Marketing

9
Span of Management
  • Number of employees reporting to a supervisor
  • Tradition has recommended a span of management of
    four to seven subordinates
  • What is best depends on the situation

10
Departmentalization
  • Basis for grouping job positions into departments
    and departments into the total organization.
  • Internal Operations Oriented
  • Functional
  • Network (Virtual)
  • Output Oriented
  • Divisional
  • Product
  • Geographic
  • Customer
  • Team (Cluster)
  • Combinations
  • Hybrid (different types at different places in
    an org.)
  • Matrix (different types at simultaneous at
    the same places in an org.)

11
Functional ApproachDepartments based on similar
activities, skills and resource use.
  • Advantages
  • Efficient use of resources
  • Economies of Scale
  • In-depth skill specialization
  • Disadvantages
  • Poor communication among departments
  • Slow response to external changes
  • Loyalty more to function than customer or the
    whole organization

12
Divisional Approach
  • Departments are grouped together based on
    organizational outputs (e.g., product, geography,
    customer)
  • Functions (e.g., marketing) are split among the
    divisions
  • Its advantages and disadvantages tend to be the
    opposite of those of the functional approach

13
Divisions
  • Advantages
  • Quicker changes in an unstable environment
  • More in touch with customers
  • Disadvantages
  • Duplication
  • Competition for resources among divisions
  • More managers needed
  • Less professional specialization

14
Matrix Approach
  • Functional and divisional chains of command
    simultaneously
  • Violates the unity of command concept.

15
Matrix Structure - Why?
  • To get the advantages of both Functional and
    Divisional Structures
  • Sophisticated technology, fast-changing
    environment
  • Diverse products and geographical areas

16
Disadvantages of Matrix
  • Many meetings to coordinate activities
  • High conflict between two sides of matrix
  • Need for extensive human relations training

17
Team Approach
  • Cross-functional teams (Clusters) consist of
    employees from various functional departments
  • Teams typically have more decision making power
    than previously held by workers at their levels.

18
Team Approach
  • Advantages
  • Quicker response time
  • Better morale
  • Reduced administrative overhead
  • Disadvantages
  • Conflict
  • Time and resources spent on meetings

19
Network (Virtual) Approach
  • Organization divides major functions among
    separate companies brokered by a small
    headquarters organization
  • Somewhat like a functional organization.

20
Network Approach
  • Advantages
  • Increases competitiveness, especially of small
    firms
  • Flexibility
  • Reduced Costs
  • Disadvantages
  • No hands-on control
  • Loyalty weakened.

21
Mechanistic vs. Organic Organizations
  • Vertical vs. Horizontal Structural Dominance
  • Rigid vs. Flexible
  • Specialized Jobs vs. Unspecialized
  • Boss Control vs. Self-Control
  • Centralized Decisions vs. Decentralized
  • Bureaucratic vs. Non-bureaucratic

22
Departmentalization Types
  • (From most Mechanistic to most Organic)
  • Functional
  • Functional with integrators, cross-functional
    committees, etc.
  • Matrix
  • Divisional
  • Team

23
When the Mechanistic (Vertical) Approach is most
Appropriate
  • External Environment is Stable
  • Growth and Innovation Goals are
  • Few or Nonexistent (Internal Stability)
  • The Organizations Size is Large
  • The Life Cycle Stage is Late
  • The Technology is Mass Production (or involving
    low-level skills)

24
Service Technology
  • Tends to be more Organic (Horizontal) than
    manufacturing
  • Employees have direct contact with customers
  • Output of the firm is intangible
  • Production and consumption are simultaneous
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com