Could the Higgs boson be invisible - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 56
About This Presentation
Title:

Could the Higgs boson be invisible

Description:

Could the Higgs boson be invisible – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: Paul689
Category:
Tags: boson | higgs | invisible | zoo

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Could the Higgs boson be invisible


1
Could the Higgs boson be invisible?
  • Pauline Gagnon
  • Indiana University
  • Why do we need the Higgs boson?
  • Current status on Higgs searches
  • Could it be invisible?
  • Could we see it if its invisible?

2
The Standard Model
  • Theoretical model describing constituents of
    matter and their interactions
  • All experimental observations corroborate the SM
    predictions to great precision
  • Two central ideas
  • 1. All matter is made of quarks and leptons
  • 2. Forces between quarks and leptons are mediated
    by exchange particles bosons
  • W?, Z0, photon, gluon

3
(No Transcript)
4
2. Fundamental interactions
5
Where does the Higgs boson come into play?
  • Electroweak theory predicts 4 massless bosons
  • Peter Higgs invented a mechanism called
    electroweak symmetry breaking which turns the
  • 4 massless bosons into
  • 3 massive bosons W, W-, Z0
  • 1 massless boson ?0

All fermions acquire mass by interacting with the
Higgs field analogous to drag force
6
Where have we looked for the Higgs so far?
  • CERN the European Laboratory for Particle
    physics near Geneva, Switzerland with LEP (Large
    Electron Positron Collider)
  • Aleph, OPAL, L3 and Delphi
  • Fermilab, since 2000 with the Tevatron
  • D0
  • CDF

7
Higgs searches at CERN
  • LEP I 1989-1994 ee- ? Z ? Z H0
  • 17 million Z decays analyzed
  • SM Higgs mass limit mH gt 65 GeV (95 CL)
  • MSSM Higgs h0 and A0 mh,A gt 45 GeV (95 CL)
  • LEP II 1995-2000 ee- ? Z ? Z H0
  • ECM 135, 161, 171, 183, 189-209 GeV
  • Integrated luminosity 2.46 fb-1 _at_ ECM gt189
  • 0.55 fb-1 _at_ ECM
    gt206
  • SM limit mH gt114.1 GeV (95 CL)
  • MSSM limit mH gt91.1 GeV (95 CL)

8
SM constraints on mH
Consistency check

Consistency
One sided limit (LEP SLD
Tevatron) mHlt 186 GeV _at_95 CL.
Renormalising to mHgt114 GeV (LEP SLD
Tevatron) mHlt 219 GeV _at_95 CL.
8
Tests of the Standard Model - EPS 2005 - July 25
- Sijbrand de Jong
9
Searches for alternative Higgs at LEP
Fermiophobic Higgs mh gt 109.7 GeV/c2
Invisible Higgs mh gt 114.4 GeV/c2
Yukawa production
Charged Higgs mH gt 78.6 GeV/c2
Decay-mode independent
Doubly charged Higgs mH gt 99.3 GeV/c2
Anomalous couplings
Flavour-independent Higgs
Low mA Higgs
2HDM limits
CP-violating Higgs
NMSSM
10
Tevatron Higgs Searches Combined (Spring 2006)
95 CL Limits/SM
10
11
Higgs prospects for discovery/exclusion 1998-1999
Higgs SUSY study / 2003 update
Tests of the Standard Model - EPS 2005 - July 25
- Sijbrand de Jong
11
12
Tevatron Higgs prospects for discovery/exclusion
Prospects in time
mid 2009
End 2007
End 2006
Tests of the Standard Model - EPS 2005 - July 25
- Sijbrand de Jong
12
13
LHC the Large Hadron Collider at CERNATLAS one
of 4 new detectors built for LHC
14
ATLAS detector
3000 scientists 150 institutes 34 countries 144
ft long 72 ft diameter 2007-2017
15
Upcoming milestones
  • 500-piece jigsaw puzzle available end of April
    2006
  • TRT will be lowered into place this summer
  • Full detector completed by summer 2007

16
IU contributions to ATLAS
  • TRT Transition Radiation Tracker
  • Half the TRT barrel modules were constructed here
    at IU from 1998-2004
  • Studies on e/? separation using the TRT
  • Modules Quality Control done at CERN
  • Modules assembly on the detector
  • Software development for track reconstruction and
    monitoring of the TRT detector
  • Tier-2 GRID center
  • Data analysis on invisible Higgs

17
Quality control lab at CERN
18
Full TRT Barrel after assembly
19
Standard Model Higgs decay channels
Higgs decays to heaviest available fermions
until mH gt 2mW or 2mZ For low mH H ?
??- or H ? bb For mH gt 160 GeV H ? WW or
H ? ZZ
20
Invisible Higgs decays
  • No invisible Higgs decays in Standard Model
  • But many other models predict invisible Higgs
    branching fraction with strong suppression of the
    main SM decay channels
  • Many such models MSSM, extra dimensions, NMSSM,
    spontaneously breaking R-parity models etc.

21
Minimal Super Symmetric Model

  • BR (H ??0?0) in the M2-? plane
  • ?0 neutralino
  • (lighest SUSY particle)
  • M2 gaugino mass
  • ? Higgs doublet mixing

BR (H ??0?0) 60

BR (H ??0?0) 20
Excluded by dark matter searches
Boudjema, Bélanger, Godbole hep-ph/0206311
Excluded by chargino searches at LEP
22
Models with extra dimensions
Antoniadis, Tuckmantel, Zwirner, Nucl. Phys., B
707 (2005) 215-232
  • H ? ? G
  • G Goldstino
  • M auxiliary mass parameter
  • Lepton number is conserved


23
Spontaneously Broken R-Parity
Hirsch, Romão, Valle, Moral, hep-ph/0407269
  • H ? JJ
  • J Goldstone boson (Majoron)
  • RJb BR(H?JJ)
  • BR(H?bb)
  • ? reduced coupling to Z
  • h Yukawa coupling
  • Lepton number is not conserved and neutrinos get
    masses

24
SM Higgs production mechanisms
q
dominated by gluon fusion qq ?qqH increases at
large mH ttH and WH,ZH less background
25
Cross-sections and trigger for invisible Higgs
26
Rapidity ?
  • A convenient way to determine where a track goes
    is to use rapidity

? - ln tan (?/2)
? 0
? ?
27
Missing transverse momentum
momentum is not balanced in the Z-direction
  • But momentum has to be balanced in the transverse
    plane
  • pT missing -? pT visible

28
Vector boson fusion
q
  • Decay characteristics
  • two forward jets
  • large pTmiss in central rapidity region
  • Main backgrounds
  • QCD 2 jets
  • 2 jets Z, Z ? ??
  • 2 jets W, W ? l?

29
Main selection cuts efficiency
? in pb-1
No trigger for this channel yet
for 10 fb-1 S/?B 10
30
The ATLAS 3-level trigger system
hardware
2.5 ms
software
10 ms
sec
31
Trigger efficiency for VBF, H?invisible
  • Currently, in trigger menu, we only trigger on
    central jets
  • Level 1 ETMISS gt 60 GeV, PTjet gt 60 GeV,
    ?jetlt3.2
  • Level 3 ETMISS gt 70 GeV, PTjet gt 70 GeV,
    ?jetlt3.2
  • Trigger extension needed for VBF H?invisible with
    ?jet up to 4.9

Ongoing work
32
2nd production mode ttH channel
  • signal
  • t? bl?, t ? bqq, H ?inv.
  • main backgrounds
  • tt largest background
  • ttZ, Z???
  • ttW, W?l?
  • bb Z/? with Z/? ? ll
  • bbW, W?l?
  • QCD Zincl. , Wincl.
  • selection (rejection)
  • only 1 lepton (bb Z/?)
  • 2 b-jets (Zincl. and Wincl. )
  • t ? jjb, mjjmW,mjjbmt
  • large mT and ETmiss (tt)

33
Transverse mass
  • Use only quantities measured in the transverse
    plane to get transverse mass
  • mT2 (? ETi)2 - (? pTi)2

34
Effect of mT cut on tt background
ttH signal ?0.5 pb-1
tt bgnd ?490 pb-1
35
tt background composition
  • bgnd tt events
  • 70 tt ? bl? b??
  • signal ttH
  • 88 ttH ?bl? bqq H

bl?b??
bl?bqq
must remove b?? events
36
Use inter-jet separation Rjj
37
Selected events for ttH for 10 fb-1 data
S/?B 2.0 (1.6)
38
Last mode Associated production. Two possible
channels HZ and WZ
W or Z
q
W or Z
H
q
39
Event selection for associate production
  • WH channel
  • large missing pT
  • one prompt lepton
  • large transverse mass
  • Main backgrounds
  • WZ l? ??
  • W incl., W l?
  • tt bb, b cl?




H ?0 ?0
WH
W l ?
l

?0
?

?0
40
Associated vector boson WH
W incl.
  • WH selection
  • 1 lepton pTmiss gt 100 GeV
  • large transverse mass mT
  • main backgrounds
  • WZ W?l?, Z???
  • W inclusive
  • tt, t ? bl?

large pTmiss ? off-shell Wincl.
41
Z0H0? (ll- invisible) analysis strategy
  • Trigger 1 or 2 prompt leptons
  • Preselection
  • large missing pT
  • 2 leptons of opposite sign and same flavour
  • loose cut on Z mass
  • Final selection
  • Use 10 discriminative variables in a
    multivariate analysis to extract signal

42
Very large background is rejected after the
simple pre-selection cuts
43
ATLAS reconstruction chain
MC generation
Simulation
Digitization
Fast reconstruction
Reconstruction
Create Analysis Object Data (AOD)
Analysis
44
Solution add a filter
Filter goal emulate preselection cuts after MC
generation
MC generation
Filter
Simulation
Digitization
Fast reconstruction
Real data
Reconstruction
Create Analysis Object Data
Analysis
45
Two handles in filter
  • missing pT ? (invisible pT)
  • Sum over invisible particles Higgs, neutrinos
    and particles falling outside the detector
    acceptance region, i.e.? gt 5.0
  • Leptons from a Z
  • Two leptons in the tracker acceptance region
  • One or both leptons must pass the trigger
    requirements
  • Two leptons of same flavor but opposite sign
  • The reconstructed mass must be close to mZ

46
Filter has looser cuts
  • Filter cuts
  • 2 leptons with ?lt 2.7
  • Trigger requirements
  • - 1 e with pT gt 18 GeV or
  • - 2 e with pT gt 23 GeV or
  • - 1 µ with pT gt 8 GeV or
  • - 2 µ with pT gt 13 GeV
  • missing pT gt 50 GeV
  • mZ 25 GeV
  • Preselection cuts
  • 2 leptons with ?lt 2.5
  • Trigger requirements
  • - 1 e with pT gt 20 GeV or
  • - 2 e with pT gt 25 GeV or
  • - 1 µ with pT gt 10 GeV or
  • - 2 µ with pT gt 15 GeV
  • missing pT gt 90 GeV
  • mZ 20 GeV

47
Filter requirement 1 no event loss
Conclusion no significant event loss at the
filter level w.r.t. ATLAS fast simulation
48
Filter requirement 2 large sample reduction
From 8360 CPU years down to 7 CPU years
49
Cut flow on fast simulation after filter
50
Cut flow on full reconstruction
Fast simulation reconstruction problems
51
We need large MC sample to go further
  • In ATLAS, all MC samples used for analyses must
    be approved
  • MC samples produced centrally on the grid
  • Our filter has been approved and our signal
    background samples will soon be centrally
    produced
  • Next step multivariate analysis with fully
    reconstructed events (maximum likelihood, neural
    network or decision tree)

52
Discriminating variables after preselection
(based on fast simulation)
pT lepton 1
pT lepton 2
Cos between leptons (2D)
Cos between leptons (3D)
53
Discriminating variables after preselection
(based on fast simulation)
transverse mass
missing pT
Cos pTmiss-pT lepton 1
mZ
54
Interpreting results w.r.t SM predictions
  • ?2 ? ? x BR(H?invisible)
  • ?SM x BRSM(H?bb)

?2 is a scaling factor, the ratio of the
production cross-section times the branching
fraction for Higgs to invisible of a certain
model to the prediction of the Standard Model
55
Analysis potential _at_ 10 fb-1 S/?B 4.0 (2.6
with syst.)
  • LHC luminosity
  • 10 fb-1 expected in 2007
  • 100 fb-1 per year the following years

Discovery potential Not much in 2007 ?2 0.5 in
2008 ?2 0.3 in 2010
56
Summary
  • LHC is due to start in 2007
  • Last chance for exclusion or evidence at the
    Tevatron for mH lt 130 GeV
  • LHC reach and luminosity should cover any
    possible Higgs decay mode
  • Even being invisible wont be an excuse for the
    Higgs not to be seen!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com