Title: Me and my data shadow:
1Me and my (data) shadow
Imposed digital personae and performance
evaluation in call centres Brenda
McPhail Faculty of Information Studies University
of Toronto Ontario, Canada Presentation to the
Oxford Internet Institute/Information,
Communication and Society Conference, September
2003
2Picture from Dawson, 1988
3- The numbers are the most important thing, they
care about them more than service or anything
else (CSR, site one) - every single thing you do is measured, its
good, yes and nohow your manager handles it
makes the difference (CSR, site two)
4Why call centres?
- technology-intensive workplace
- extensively networked
- at the forefront of the trend towards electronic
monitoring in white-collar workplaces - rapidly-expanding industry employing large
numbers of workers
5The sites
- A call centre of a major Canadian bank
- large (500 staff)
- A call centre in an Ontario Credit Union
- small (9 staff)
6EPM
- Electronic performance monitoring (EPM)
- the use of computer technology to collect,
store, analyse and report information about a
workers activities - At my sites, EPM includes
- telephone call recording and intermittent
monitoring - collecting productivity statistics via ACD
- work status tracking
7Digital persona
- Definition of digital persona
- a model of an individuals public personality
based on data and maintained by transactions, and
intended for use as a proxy for the individual.
(Clarke, 1994)
8Imposed Digital persona
- Assigned to an individual by another individual
or organisation - The person represented has little or no control
over - the types of data composing the persona
- when data is collected
- the way data is used
9Persona effects
- Quality vs. quantity
- Privacy
- Changing supervisory relationships
10Quality vs. Quantity
- an issue in most call centre research and in much
of EPM research - professional banker vs cog in a bank machine?
- separation between what work entails (talking to
people, doing transactions and solving problems)
and what counts in evaluations (speed, volume)
11Quality
Can do great calls and get slammed for saying
bye instead of goodbye (CSR, site one) I
saw one group giving the high 5 to the person
with the lowest score--they dont take it
seriously. (CSR, site one)
12Quantity
Were getting hammered on the numbers today,
theres a lot of people away but it doesnt
matter (CSR, site 1) I write an explanation
to go with the stats report when it goes up, tell
them reasons if the numbers vary a bit from month
to month (supervisor, site 2)
13Privacy
- supervisors can examine processes, not just
products, on a daily basis - workers lose control over self-presentation as
public and private boundaries shift - people accept work monitoring but want to
maintain privacy in down-time and have varing
degrees of confidence that employers will respect
this need
14- There is a persistent rumour that personal calls
are monitored, although theyre not supposed to
be. One person phrased her suspicions bluntly
they dont tell you the truth (CSR, site one)
15- When looking at implementing or customising
technology, the company would err on the side of
not invading privacyits an obvious, open policy
issue. (CSR, site two)
16Supervisory relationships
- Reliance on a digital persona for performance
evaluation causes shifting supervisory
relationships - subjective vs. objective
- human judgement vs. system programming
- Changes are between front-line workers and
immediate supervisors, but also between
supervisors and their direct reports
17- whos done what, were, when, how and how long it
took, it comes back to you in a report. Thats
what you use... (supervisor, site 1)
18- We have a process to give ideas to upper
management. Some of the other women and I, were
thinking right now of security changes (CSR
site 2)
19Conclusions
- Imposed digital personae may be accepted when
- information is appropriate accurate
- uses are fair and necessary
- employer is trusted
- It is the surrounding practice, not the program,
that determines the result
20The End
21(No Transcript)