Reduce maintenance costs

1

• Reduce maintenance costs

2
Experienceless downtime
3
Reduce crusheranddownstream wear
4
Maximize percentageoffines produced
5
SAVE
6
XP HammereXtreme Performance Bi-Metal Hammer
from
Wear-ConceptsYour Global Resourcefor
Innovative Wear Solutions

• Wear-Concepts, INC. ? 106 NW Business Park Lane ?
  Riverside, MO 64150
• PHONE [phone] ? FAX [phone] ?
  www.wearcon.com

7
eXtreme Performance Bi-Metal Hammer

• After nearly a decade of solving tough wear
  problems, Wear-Con is introducing the ultimate
  solution to the constant wear experienced in the
  metal hammers found in many crushers today. Our
  new bi-metal hammer is designed to extend the
  life of each hammer application, resulting in
  longer wear, reduced overall costs, longer MTBF
  (Mean Time Between Failure) and reduced overall
  downtime.
• Offered exclusively through Wear-Concepts,
  Inc, Riverside, MO, USA.
• 816 587-1923

8
Actual Comparison

• The following slides document an actual
  comparison between standard manganese hammers and
  Wear-Cons new

eXtreme Performance Hammer
9
eXtreme Performance Bi-Metal Hammer CASTING vs.
HARDFACED CARBON STEEL

• Crushing 35-55 grind coal.
• Carbon Steel hard-faced hammer.
• Wear after crushing 70,000 tons.
• Ready for scrap

10
eXtreme Performance Bi-Metal Hammer CASTING

• Bi-METAL CASTING
• High Chrome Wear Resistant HTV30 for crushing
• Tough Heat-treated low alloy steel at the eye
• 3-1/2 wide
• 6 high
• 12-1/4 long
• 3-1/4Ø eye
• Wt 60 lbs. (27.2 kg.)

11
eXtreme Performance Bi-Metal Hammer CASTING

• Tough MildSteel 28 32 HRC
• HTV30 Wear Resistant Alloy with chromium carbides
  56 62 HRC

12
eXtreme Performance Bi-Metal Hammer CASTINGS
Hammer rotated to side 2. Currently in excess of
300,000 tons.
Wear-Con Bi-METAL Hammer at 280,000 tons.
Length of casting remains at 12-1/4 Estimated
Life 400,000 to 450,000 tons
13
Wear-Con Bi-METAL ADVANTAGES

• Factory through hardened to 62 Rc.
• No hard-facing required.
• No waiting for manganese to work harden.
• Reduced maintenance costs.
• Less change outs reduces man-hours.
• No hard-facing welding required (no man-hour
  costs).
• No electrode costs.
• Length of hammer castings remains at 12-1/4.
• Reducing crusher and downstream wear.
• Holding critical mineral size requirements.
• Maximizing percentage of fines produced.
• 6.5 times the life over carbon steel hammers with
  hard-facing.
• Crushing costs reduced a minimum of 53.

14
Cost Savings Using Wear-Cons eXtreme
Performance Bi-Metal Hammer Based on 450,000 tons
End User Cost / Hammer 180
End User Cost / Hammer 550

• 550 x 20 hammers 11,000
• 11,000 x 1 set 11,000

• 180 x 20 hammers 3600
• 3600 x 6.5 sets 23,400

COST SAVINGS 12,400 (53)
15
eXtreme Performance Bi-Metal Hammer

• This concludes the preview
• Contact Wear-Con immediately for a free,
  no-obligation quote on a set of XP Hammers for
  your plant
• Close this browser window to return to the
  previous screen