Bez tytulu slajdu - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Bez tytulu slajdu

Description:

Project Commitee/PIP Commitee. Project manager. Project team ... Regional Steering Commitee. Decision. Project confirmation. Agreement. Management. Authority ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: UM12
Category:
Tags: bez | commitee | slajdu | tytulu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bez tytulu slajdu


1
CITY OF POZNAN
Organisation work with EU projects in Poznan
City Hall
Marta Krause, Szymon Oscislowski
2
PRESENTATION PLAN
  • Key elements of success
  • Organisation work with EU projects in Poznan City
    Hall
  • EU funds in Poland
  • Achievements

3
REGIONS OF OBJECTIVE 1 SIMILARITY OF POLAND AND
BULGARIA
  • Low GDP per capita
  • Cohesion
  • EU funds for improving infrastructure
  • Operational programmes

4
KEY ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS
  • Human resources
  • Management approach
  • Organisational structure
  • Financial capacity
  • Common awareness and knowledge
  • Strategic planning

5
HUMAN RESOURCES
  • Quantity
  • Quality
  • Investing in people
  • Motivation system
  • Good co-operation between people engaged into
    entire process

6
MANAGEMENT APPROACH
  • Awareness
  • Decisiveness
  • Quick access
  • Lobbying
  • Co-ordination

7
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTUREProject Cycle
  • A) Project preparation
  • problem definition
  • objectives
  • tasks
  • results
  • budget and timetable
  • management and implementation structure
    people resources
  • B) Project submission
  • C) Signing a contract

8
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTUREProject Cycle
  • D) Project implementation and financial
    clearance
  • people
  • formal assignment of the leader and
    implementing team
  • Procedures and contracts
  • financial budgetary service
  • Internal/external audits
  • Partnership contracts
  • Contacts with Implementing Institutions

9
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE4 solutions
  • centralised
  • decentralised
  • outsourcing
  • mixed

10
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURECentralised
  • whole project in one place
  • better control, no need for horizontal
    coordination
  • more time for Departments/Units to do their
    usual job
  • detachment of Dep/Units from the responsibility
    for project and raising the money externally
  • weakening internal competition between
    Dep/Units
  • possible lack of ideas/content for developing
    projects
  • need to employ and train more people in the Unit
    for Eur. Funds

11
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTUREDe-centralised
  • high level of responsibility with the
    Dep/Units
  • better internal competition
  • capacity and knowledge competences builiding
    in the whole institution
  • problems with communication between all actors
  • problems with coordination and sharing
    responsibilities between Unit for Eur. Funds and
    Dep/Units (project leaders)
  • big problems with coordination of
    inter-departmental projects

12
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTUREOutsourcing
  • all the job done externally
  • specialised body (no need to train and employ
    additional people in the municipality)
  • all dangers connected with detached institution
    (communication, control, tendency to act too
    independently)
  • No possibility in the 2004-6 programming period
    in Poland to pay from structural funds as a of
    amounts raised

13
FINANCIAL CAPACITY
  • co-financing
  • pre-financing
  • budgetary reserve
  • outsourcing

14
COMMON AWARENESS KNOWLEDGE
  • common understanding for the whole process (on
    high and technical levels)
  • all Dep/Units should be used to raising money
    externally for every new idea/project, this shall
    be automatic
  • convincing all Dep/Units and employees that
    despite many problems external money is very
    important and needed

15
STRATEGIC PLANNING
  • specifying development priorities and measures
  • concentration of resources and efforts,
  • relevance to regional and national strategic
    plans and OPs
  • coherent branch programmes

16
INTERNAL PROCEDURES
information
Fundraising Unit
monitoring
verification
consulting
identigfication
departments Municipal institutions Programme
teams CDP
Budget Dept.
preliminary projects
timetable
project preparing
Project manager Project team
submitting applications
agreement
Project Commitee/PIP Commitee
recommendation
17
POZNANCapacity building
  • Project Leaders Club
  • Thematic meetings every 6-8 weeks (with internal
    or external experts)
  • Platform for discussion and best practices
    exchange
  • Intranet site
  • Project Management in Poznan Municipality - Manual

18
KEY ELEMENTS OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
1. Technical documentation 2. Property
ownership 3. Permission for building 4.
Environmental impact (if required) 5.
Environmental decision issued by an responsible
institution (NATURA 2000) 6. (Pre-) feasibility
study
19
KEY ELEMENTS OF SOCIAL PROJECT
1. Good problem description 2. Suitable partners
and good identification of their interests 3.
Project for target group not for the project 4.
Strong coordination and sound financial management
20
INSTRUMENTS
  • Pre-accession funds
  • Structural funds
  • Cohesion Fund
  • Initiatives
  • Community programs

21
STRUCTURAL FUNDS
  • ERDF
  • ESF
  • EAGGF
  • FIFG

22
ALLOCATION OF STRUCTURAL FUNDS AND COHESION FUND
IN POLAND IN THE PROGRAMMING PERIOD 2004 -
2006 INCLUDING NATIONAL CO-FINANCING
  • 14.891,5 million euro

23
SYSTEM OF IMPLEMENTATION IN POLAND
  • National Development Plan 2004-2006
  • 5 Sectoral Operational Programmes
  • Integrated Regional Operational Programme
  • Technical Assistance Programme

24
SYSTEM OF IMPLEMENTATION IN POLAND
FUND
PROGRAMME
SOP Competitiveness
ERDF
SOP Human Resources
ESF
SOP Rural Development
EAGGF
SOP Transport
ERDF
SOP Fisheries
FIFG
Integrated Regional Operational Programme
ESF ERDF
25
SUBMISSION AND IMPLEMENTATION
Project confirmation
Agreement
Technical and Financial assessment
Decision
Formal assessment
Regional Steering Commitee
Monitoring and evaluation
Public procurement
Payment for invoices
Beneficiary
Applying for reimbursement
Preparing project
26
PROJECTS SUPPORTED BY EUROPEAN FUNDS IN POZNAN
  • 1. Pre-accession funds - 9 projects
  • total cost 140 million euro
  • European co-financing 57 million euro
  • 2. Integrated Regional Operational Programme - 13
    projects
  • total cost 29 million euro
  • European co-financing 17 million euro
  • 3. SOP Transport - 3 projects
  • total cost 68,5 million euro
  • European co-financing 37,5 million euro
  • 4. SOP Human Resources - 3 projects
  • total cost 1,3 million euro
  • European co-financing 1,1 million euro
  • 5. Community Initiatives - 2 projects
  • total cost 6,1 million euro
  • European co-financing 6 million euro
  • 6. Community programmes - 8 projects
  • total cost 1,2 million euro
  • European co-financing 0,8 million euro

27
PROJECTS SUPPORTED BY EUROPEAN FUNDS IN POZNAN
total cost of the projects 246,1 million
euro european co-financing 119,4 million
euro
28
NEW EU INITIATIVES
SUPPORT FOR MAs AND BENEFICIARIES IMPLEMENTING
EUROPEAN PROJECTS
  • JESSICA
  • JASPERS
  • JEREMIE

29
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com