Parliament of the Republic of South Africa - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Parliament of the Republic of South Africa

Description:

To address questions asked about the purpose of Municipal ... Staff compilations. 1990 total value. 1997 site value. Commercial. properties. Residential ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: nicomc4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Parliament of the Republic of South Africa


1
Parliament of the Republic of South Africa
  • Presentation to the Portfolio Committee for
    Provincial and Local Government on the Property
    Rates Bill
  • 30 May 2003

2
Purpose of this presentation
  • To address questions asked about the purpose of
    Municipal Property Rates in South Africa and the
    purpose of this Bill
  • To inform the debate on the basis of valuation
    and rating
  • To outline the scope of policy issues still to be
    addressed

3
Purpose of Municipal Property Rates
  • Questions asked at work shop and during
    hearings.
  • where did the current notion of property rates
    come from?
  • what is the purpose of property rates?
  • what do property rates pay for?
  • what is this Bill about?

4
Property rates in South Africaorigins of current
notion
  • Property rates has a long tradition in SA
  • Has traditionally been used as the single most
    important source of local own- source
    discretionary revenue
  • However historically only existed in urban WLA s
  • Amalgamation of municipalities -bring former BLA
    s, R293 towns etc into prop tax base

5
Property rates in South Africa origins of current
notion...
  • Correlation between who paid property rates
    before and level of infrastructure and public
    services
  • Rallying points for rent boycotts, non -payment
    of service charges and one city one tax base
  • Result of history both decision -makers and rate
    payers think of rates as a price paid for
    specific services

6
Purpose of property rates in South
Africa-significance
  • When compared to revenue (and profits from
    consumption-based tariff funded services and
    inter-governmental transfers) still the most NB
    source of own- source discretionary revenue for
    local authorities
  • Former WLA s 1/5 of all local revenue (- R 4 bn
    or 20.2 of own source revenue or 19.7 of
    total revenue)

7
Significance compared
  • Property rates as of total government tax
    revenue (comparison done for 90 s by IMF)
  • SA 6.74
  • Developing Countries 3.30
  • Industrialized Countries 5.54

8
Significance...
  • As of sub-national government revenue (90 s)
  • SA 11.44
  • Developing Countries 9.63
  • Industrialized Countries 12.99

9
Purpose of property rates what do rates pay for?
  • a means to distribute the cost of general local
    government activities or community services among
    rate payers in accordance with their ability to
    pay, as measured by the (market) value of
    property
  • To pay for services that generally provide
    benefits that accrue broadly across an area-and
    are not not users or sub-groups

10
What should this Bill aim to achieve?
  • Legitimacy
  • Uniformity
  • Common tax base
  • Common valuation cycle
  • Horizontal and vertical Equity
  • Efficiency
  • Enforceability

11
What should this Bill aim to achieve?
  • Openness
  • Sound monitoring of standards
  • Simple and transparent appeals processes
  • Relief from extraordinary tax burdens
  • Redistribution amongst individuals
  • Redistribution amongst localities

12
The debate on the basis of valuation and rating
  • Issues, Options, Arguments and Evidence

13
Valuation and rating issues
  • What to value ?
  • What to tax?
  • Who should set the rate and determine the relief?
  • How should this be done ?

14
What to value i.e. which base should be taxed?
  • Bahl 98 Long standing debate if property tax
    base should include improvements
  • Thus far no uniform world wide practice has
    evolved
  • If there is a trend then it is towards valuing
    and rating the total value of property
  • However what are the cases put forward?

15
The case for land only
  • Cost of valuation process is lower
  • Administrative efficiencies are better, updating
    of property records and data maintenance is
    easier
  • land value based valuation and rating is seen as
    a possible incentive for investment as
    improvements and maintenance of improvements are
    excluded from taxation

16
The case for land only...
  • Land taxation has a strong relation to the notion
    of public good
  • Improvements are a matter of private choice
  • Based on an economic theory that the supply of
    land is essentially fixed (inelastic)
  • Site value rating is said to be neutral to land
    use
  • Taxes on land discourage speculation

17
The case for land and improvements
  • Total property value is easily understood
  • The concept of willing buyer willing seller is
    widely accepted
  • two thirds of property value lies in improvement
    in real estate
  • land and improvements recognizes wealth in assets
    and therefore treats all citizens equal
  • land and improvement is easy to administer
    because source data is readily available
  • land and improvement valuation does not prevent
    land only rating

18
The case for land and improvements...
  • Valuing land and improvements allows greater
    flexibility in lowering the nominal rate than a
    tax based only the capital value of land
  • This provides in a politically palatable tax
    base
  • Valuing land and improvement holds promise of
    optimizing the local tax base

19
The case for land and improvements...
  • Record of sales of vacant land in urban areas not
    as rich as sale of properties at total value
  • Hence sites has to be valued by residual method,
    ie first determine the bundled property value
    then deduct the value of the improvements
  • SVR is more subjective than total value

20
Land versus land and improvements (some thoughts)
  • The test of transparency,understandability and
    acceptability
  • The test of horizontal equity (owners of high
    value properties on small sites)
  • The test of real local government income and
    basis for inter-governmental transfers
  • Political palatability

21
Comparative options The current UK property tax
system...
  • The amount paid is set by the local authority in
    accordance with a prescribed formula
  • As example two adults living in a 30 000 pound
    house (band A) will pay 2/3 as much tax as those
    living in a band D house (80 000) and those in
    band H (320 000) twice as much

22
Comparative options The current UK property tax
system?
  • Foundations (Law, Henry April 2000)
  • - occupiers of commercial properties pay uniform
    business rate (UBR) based on annual rental value
  • - rate is set annually at national level
  • - total amount collected is distributed to local
    authorities through complex formula
  • - 50 of full rate can be levied on vacant
    properties
  • - agricultural land and buildings are exempt
    from UBR

23
Comparative options The current UK property tax
system...
  • Residential properties are subject to Council tax
  • Council tax is based on the selling price at the
    time of the valuation (currently 91)
  • Properties are assigned to 8 valuation bands
    ranging from A - H
  • A under 40 000 pounds H over 320 000 pounds

24
Comparative options The current UK property tax
system...
  • Advantages of UBR and Council tax
  • - easy to administer
  • - taxes are difficult to evade and avoid
  • - ensuring compliance is easy
  • - because the taxes are tied to property they
    can be applied by any LG structure
  • Disadvantages of UBR and Council tax
  • - valuations involve inspection of premises
  • - many appeals are generated when valuations are
    received
  • - financial disincentive to improve and develop
  • - the tax rewards the owner of vacant and
    undeveloped land

25
Disadvantages...
  • - valuations are insufficient and infrequent (up
    and down turns)
  • - exemption of agricultural properties distorts
    the property market
  • - allocation of all UBR income to local
    authorities gives rise to high gearing of
    discretionary local government spending
  • - local authorities have no direct interest in
    promoting improvements
  • - the tax is regressive in that an undue
    proportion of the burden is borne by low value
    properties
  • - the tax is also regressive across local
    authorities (Westminster with highest
    concentration of high value properties has lowest
    rates)
  • - banding avoids valuation of individual
    properties which leads to fortuitous advantages
    and disadvantages for those value is close to the
    step between one band and the next
  • - Council tax generates insufficient income

26
Rating processes
  • Issues and Options

27
Rating issues and options
  • Site rating (the base of the tax is land values
    only)
  • Flat Rating (the base of the tax is land and
    improvements with both taxed at the same rate)
  • Composite rating (the base of the tax is land and
    improvements,they are both taxed but at different
    rates)

28
Who must decide - the basis and the rate
  • Section 229 - rate setting a local power or an
    unfettered local power?
  • Most Govt.'s do not give unlimited powers. (Bahl
    98)

29
Evidence
  • US - Oates Schwab 79/80 Pittsburg SVR, graded
    or composite rating played significant role
    citys econ resurgence.
  • Yet no US states to date have authorised site
    value tax.

30
Number of local authorities using Site, Flat or
Composite Rating
  • Province Site Flat Composite Total Percent
  • Cape 4 89 72 165 44.5
  • Natal 34 1 32 67 18.1
  • OFS 10 8 33 51 13.7
  • Transvaal 78 2 8 88 23.7
  • Total 126 100 145 371 100.0
  • Percent 34.0 27.0 39.1 100.0
  • Source CSS (1994)

31
Shift in Share between Commercial and Residential
Properties (1990 Total Value to 1997 Site Value)
70
  • Source City of Cape Town, Department of Finance,
    Rating and Valuation project. Staff
    compilations

1990 total value
60
1997 site value
50
40

30
20
10
0
Commercial properties
Residential properties
32
Shift in Share from 1990 Total Value to 1997 Site
Value in CBD
M O N T H L Y R A T E S (M I L L I O N S)

12
10
1990 total value
8
6
4
1997 site value
2
0
200
600
400
800
1,000
NUMBER OF PROPERTIES
33
Shift in Incidence from a Sample of CBD
Properties with High Improvement Values to
Properties with Lower Values (1990 Total Value to
1997 Site Value)
3

1990 rates
M I L L I O N S
1997 rates
2
1
0
High improvement values
Lower values
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com