Title: An outcomes framework for biosecurity
1Review of Border Cost Recovery Regime
2Review of Biosecurity Cost Recovery
- Current regulations in place since May 2003
- Current regime proving difficult to administer
- Some under-recovery some over recovery.
3Funding review cost recovery appropriate when
those charged can
- Change behaviour to reduce the costs of the
service or the risks that give rise to the need
for the service - Assess whether the benefits of the service at its
current level exceeds the cost - Determine whether the service is being delivered
efficiently
4Proposed principles for revised border regime
- Costs which are variable should be recovered by
charges which reflect this variability (ie hourly
rates) - Costs which are fixed should be recovered by
costs payable as specific amounts - Fees should be kept as simple as possible and
those that are very similar are combined so as to
reduce transaction and compliance costs
5Key changes proposed
- Simplify charges for border clearance
- Hourly rate charge increase from 72.30 to 98.00
- Charges at either hourly rates or specific
amounts as appropriate - Organism identification full cost recovery
- Sea container levy
- Biosecurity entry levy
- Memorandum accounting
6Proposals to charge at hourly rates
- Non complying shipping containers
- Offshore inspection of ships
- Unaccompanied baggage or effects
- Sawn timber
- Logs or round wood
- Stored produce
- Fishmeal
- Plant material
7Costs payable as set fees
- Organism identifications
- Inspection of vehicles
- Inspection of animals or animal material
- Permits issued under Import Health Standards
- Travel costs (Zone charges)
- Biosecurity entry levy
- Container levy
8Proposed hourly rate charges
- Currently 4 inspection hourly rates charged (from
72 - 130) - MAF is proposing to rationalise to 2 charging
rates - Veterinary inspection rate 96.10
- All other MAF inspections 98.00
- Current minimum charge is for 30 minutes
- Proposed minimum charge is for 15 minutes
9Proposed sea container levy
- Current charge of 8.75 for monitoring and
verifying sea containers replaced by - Levy to implement the Import Health Standard for
Sea Containers - Levy of 13.00 on loaded containers (paid by
importer) - Levy of 5.00 on empty containers (paid by
shipping company)
10Actions to be funded by proposed sea container
levy
- Monitoring and verifying container compliance
- Identifying high risk containers and notifying
port company - Auditing the clearance of containers
- Paying port companies for moving audit containers
for inspection - Notifying the port company when the container can
be moved to transitional facility
11Further actions funded by container levy
- Responding to accredited persons enquiries
- Identifying organisms intercepted by accredited
persons - Entering data and issuing biosecurity clearance
for compliant containers - Analysing data sourced from accredited persons
and other sources - Providing information (newsletters and manuals)
to assist in identifying and managing biosecurity
risks
12Inspection of non-complying sea containers
- Currrent charge is 40.40 per container
- MAF will charge for inspection at an hourly rate
- MAF will pay port companies for requesting them
to move containers - MAF will charge importer for the cost of moving
for 6 sided inspection
13Proposed charges for used vehicles
- Simplify the current 15 categories of charge to
4 as follows - Motor cycles and mopeds - 15
- Light motor vehicles - 25
- Heavy motor vehicles- 50
- Used machinery etc - 98 per
hour - Re-inspection charged same amount as initial
inspection
14Proposed memorandum accounting
- Under or over recovery of costs to be carried
forward and costs subsequently adjusted - Will apply to
- Used vehicles
- Sea container levy
15Biosecurity Entry Levy
- Levy will replace current documentation fee of
28.70 - Levy will fund electronic screening to identify
risk goods - Proposed levy of 2.25 on all NZCS import entries
- Levy to be paid by all importers and collected by
NZCS (when it collects its own fees)
16Identification (ID) of organisms
- Review of policy on organism ID and charging
underway - Two proposed options for charging if importer is
required to have an organism ID undertaken - Option 1 importer would only pay organism ID
cost if organism is found to be regulated - Charge applies irrespective of whether organism
ID is needed for clearance or for future risk
profiling.
17Organism ID option 1 (cont.)
- Crown would fund IDs for non-regulated organisms.
- Where live organism is found, importers could
have goods treated, without having to wait for
ID - Importers would be required to pay for both
treatment of their goods and organism ID.
18Organism ID option 2
- Option 2 importer would pay for organism ID only
where it is required for clearance - ID charge would be applied to all organisms
regulated non-regulated - Where a live organism is found, importers could
have goods treated and not be required to have
organism identifed - Importer would be required to pay for treatment
of goods but not organism ID.
19Organism ID (cont)
- MAF preference is for Option 2.
- Charges for organism ID will not be included in
regulations - Charges contestable subject to market forces
- Other competing providers can provide organism
identifications.
20Proposed charges
- Current charge is 130.55 per specimen (174.60
after hours) - Proposed charges per submission and per product
line are - 370 (single or multiple IDs) for identification
of invertebrates, nematodes, fungi bacteria - 490 (single or multiple IDs) for identification
of viruses - Level 3 post-entry quarantine actual and
reasonable costs.
21Travel costs for MAF staff
- Payable by person who needs service
- Zone 1 0-10 km 45
- Zone 2 11-25 km 70
- Zone 3 26-50 km 140
- Zone 4 51-75 km 200
- Where the distance is greater than 75 km, hourly
rate of 98 and actual and reasonable costs would
apply
22Proposal for offshore inspection of ships
- Charge ship operator actual travel costs and
travel time to complete inspection at 98 per
hour - General surveillance and clearance of ship in
port relating to refuse and meat lockers will
continue to be Crown funded
23Proposal for individual risk goods
- Risk goods imported in baggage to be charged
actual and reasonable cost of treatment by MAF
approved treatment supplier - Costs of packaging returning goods also to be
paid - Charges will be paid before treatment commences
- Goods requiring on-site cleaning, (eg, dirty
footwear, tents), at ports of first arrival or
International Mail Centre will not be charged.
24Proposed timeline
- Consultation completed by 24 May 06
- Sea container and biosecurity entry levies,
revised charges for used vehicles, and revised
hourly rates in place by 1 July 06, or as soon as
possible thereafter - Revised system for identification of organisms to
be implemented from November 2006 if not sooner.