Title: Two Different Approaches to Government Organizations and Reforms
1Two Different Approaches to Government
Organizations and Reforms
- Managerial approach focusing on efficiency,
effectiveness and economy - Political approach focusing on responsiveness,
accountability and participation of the public
2Managerial Approach to Public Organization
- Is there a best way to organize government
functions? - By purpose (function), process, clientele or
material, or place - inherent conflict between these four principles
- Bureaucracy as the most efficient form of
organization, and criticism of the bureaucratic
model
3Reforms of the bureaucratic model
- Reorganization and rationalization of government
structures and processes - decentralization and toward greater flexibility
in such areas as hiring, rewards and financial
control - an emphasis on output rather than process
control, and on developing more measurable
targets - reengineering - an overhaul of the entire
organizational structure and processes
4More Radical Departure of the Bureaucratic Model
- Not techniques, but institutional changes
- Break-up of monolithic units and organize public
services around more manageable products,
services and customers - separating core functions from executive
functions, and creating semi-autonomous agencies - privatization and creating competition among
public agencies
5The Political Approach to Government Organizations
- Normative arguments for a fragmented structure
the executive branch structure should reflect the
values, conflicts, and competing forces to be
found in a pluralistic society. The ideal of a
neatly symmetrical, frictionless organizational
structure is a dangerous illusion. - organizational reality politics is necessarily
an element in designing government structure
6Explaining Public Sector Reforms
- Managerial explanation whose interests are best
served by the reforms? - Public choice explanation where does the impetus
come from? - Heroism changes in the political arena
- the interests of the bureaucrats and reforms
7Existing Public Choice Theories of Bureaucracy
- The pluralist model (Anthony Downs)
- The New Right Model (William Niskennen)
8The Pluralist Model
- Motivational Diversity
- The motivations of bureaucrats
- self-interest motives power, money, prestige,
convenience, and security - Broader motivations personal loyalty, mission
commitment, and desires to serve the public - Types of officials
- climbers and conservers (purely self-interested
officials) - zealots, advocates, and statesmen (mixed motive
officials)
9Important Observation and Arguments
- Law of Hierarchy coordination of large-scale
activities without markets requires a
hierarchical authority structure - biased behavior
- information distortion
- selective implementation
- selective compliance
- Imperfect control no one can fully control the
behavior of a large organization
10Important Observation and Arguments
- Law of diminishing control the larger an
organization becomes the weaker is the control
over its action by those at the top - law of counter-control the greater the effort
made by a top-level official to control the
behavior of subordinate officials, the greater
the effort made by these subordinates to evade or
counteract such control - Law of decreasing coordination the larger an
organization becomes, the poorer is the
coordination among its actions - dilemma need for hierarchical control and almost
impossibility of effective and efficient
hierarchical control
11The Pluralist Model and Public Sector Reform
- Suggesting the almost unsurmountable problems
facing government bureaucracy and the needs to
stay away as much as possible from this type of
organization - need for reforms, but not why the reforms are
possible or the specific direction of the reforms
12The New Right Model
- A narrow and simplified conception of what
bureaucrats want - Bureaucratic motivations budget maximization and
bureaucrats as budget maximizers - Bureaus and Sponsors
- Advantages enjoyed by bureaucrats
- informational power and agenda power
- Budget-max. and oversupply of agency outputs
13The New Right Model and Public Sector Reforms
- Explaining why and the budgets have been inflated
and the bureaucracy has grown, but not why and
how the bureaucracy has shrunk - why have public sector reforms been possible even
if some of these reforms appear to work against
the interests of the bureaucrats? - An example privatization if the budget-max.
account of bureaucracies is correct, government
officials should oppose privatization. Then , how
is it possible?
14In Search for a New Model
- Budget-Maximization and changes in public
organizations in recent years - rationalization, improvement and strengthening of
control, and the implementation of the Next Steps
and similar measures, and privatization in
Western countries
15The Next Steps in Britain and Privatization (I)
- Next Steps a development described as the most
far-reaching since the Northecote-Trevelyan
reforms in the 19th century - seeking to eventually transfer most of the
executive functions of government departments
that involve in delivering services to the public
to semi-autonomous agencies. The executive
functions are viewed as distinct from the
traditional higher civil service functions of
policy making and ministerial advice
16The Next Steps in Britain and Privatization (II)
- The agencies are headed by chief executives,
often appointed by open competition, on
fixed-term contract - many of them recruited from
outside the civil service. - These agencies are promised day to day freedom
from ministerial and departmental supervision and
interference, but they operate within the policy
and resource frameworks set by departments
17The Next Steps in Britain and Privatization (III)
- By mid-1994 - 6 years after the launching of the
program - over 60 of all civil servants were
working in Next Steps agencies and a further 17
were in definite or likely candidates for further
agency status
18An Example of Next Steps Reform
- Department of Social Security in Britain
- Splitting the DSS into a Headquarters and a group
of agencies such as Benefit Agency, Child Support
Agency, War Pensions Agency, Contribution Agency,
Information Technology Services Agency and
Resettlement Agency
19Bureau-Shaping Model of Bureaucracy
- Individual actors pursue their self-interest in
an institutional environment which determines the
incentives and constraints which they face. - Institutional rational choice approach an
emphasis on institutional environment, which
determines the incentives and constraints of
bureaucrats - Reorganizations are viewed as strategies pursued
by rational bureaucrats to bring their bureau
into a form in line with their interests and
preferences
20Main Premises of The Bureau-Shaping Model
- main direction of reforms is set by politicians
but is also influenced by senior bureaucrats an
exclusive focus on change of political leadership
is not adequate because it could not explain the
lack of resistance among the senior bureaucrats
and could not explain the speed with which reform
has been implemented - the preferences of senior bureaucrats,
institutional environment and political
constraints
21Key Elements
- Central departments and semi-autonomous agencies
- executive activity implementation of public
policy and delivering of public services - policy work setting the aims of executive
activity, evaluating implementation structure and
results - types of budgets and bureaus
22Types of Budgets
- Core element Expenditures spent on the operation
of the bureaus - Bureau element money paid out to the private
sector in the form of grants, contracts with
private firms and transfer payments - Program and portfolio elements money supervised
by the bureau but passed on to other governmental
bodies for use in implementation
23Types of Bureaus
- Determined by the relative importance of
different components of budget - Regulatory, delivery and servicing bureaus core
element as the dominant part of budgets - Transfer and contract bureaus bureau element as
the dominant part of budgets - Control bureaus program and portfolio elements
as the dominant part of budgets
24Preferences Relevant to the Form of Bureaus
- Level of core budgets which is positively related
to the level of executive activity - Level of policy work which, by implication, is
negatively related to the level of executive
activity - Both are sought after by bureaucrats but gain in
one necessarily means loss in the other - Indifference curve figure
25Constraints Set by Politicians
- Proportion of executive activity is positively
related to the size of core budget - changes of political constraints
- optimum points
26Bureau-shaping Strategies
- Adding or passing on executive activity (to alter
core budget) and policy work (to alter the
proportion of policy work time) to maximize
utility under constraints set by politicians - collective action problem
- DSS of Britain as an example