Title: Low Arousal Designing Staff Approaches to People with Autism
1Low ArousalDesigning Staff Approaches to People
with Autism
- Bryan Evans
- Specialist Services Coordinator
- The National Autistic Society
2It has been suggested that carers supporting
persons with LD do not need to be highly trained
or expert(Harris Hewett BILD)
3Important for Staff to appreciate issues related
to supporting people with Autism
- The Triad of Impairments
- Social communication
- Social Interaction
- Social imagination and need for routines/rituals
- Sensory differences including hypo and
hypersensitivity - Cognitive differences
- T.O.M deficit
- C.C. style of processing information
- E.F deficit
- Increased vulnerability to mental health problems
4Staff perceptions
- Tendency to form negative dispositional
attributions - Staff have tendency to be more sympathetic/toleran
t with those on the lower end of the spectrum - Less tolerant of those who possess higher I.Q.
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9 10Any knowledge or understanding of the illusion
we may gain at the intellectual level remains
virtually powerless to diminish the magnitude of
the illusion.
11(No Transcript)
12Staff beliefs and assumptions
- The issue of whether or not someone is in control
and aware of their behaviour. - Errors in thinking can lead to a number of
negative ideas arising such as
13- They know what theyre doing
- Theyre doing it on purpose
- Its attention seeking behaviour
- Theyre trying to wind me up
- I mustnt let them win or Ill be reinforcing
negative behaviour - Etc., etc.
14The low arousal approach - most appropriate and
effective for interacting positively with autism
15My concerns
- Limited research has indicated that a number of
misconceptions prevail - Many carers appear to misunderstand some core
principles of low arousal - Acquired beliefs can get in the way
16- Affecting the quality of interaction
- Creating inconsistency in approach
- Resulting in increased confusion and anxiety and
an increase in critical incidents that could
otherwise be avoided
17An overview of low arousal approaches
- A non-confrontational way of working with people
- A philosophy of care based on valuing people
- Specifically avoids aversive interventions
- Gets staff to reflect on their own behaviour
- Raises awareness of environmental effects
- Challenges staff perceptions of short term
behaviour management - A collection of strategies designed to rapidly
reduce aggression
18True/False Statements
- 21 statements designed to test low arousal
literacy - Respondents are asked to answer what they believe
to be typically true or false
19Examples
- The low arousal approach encourages staff to
seek the least line of resistance in any
confrontational situation.
TRUE
20Giving a person distracters, specifically
things that they like, when they are challenging
may resolve an incident but will definitely
reinforce negative behaviour i.e., they will use
that behaviour in future to get what they want.
FALSE
21Removing stressors during an incident may reduce
challenging behaviour but in itself does not
teach a person how to cope in the long run.
TRUE
22Several statements consistently trip respondents
up
- Low arousal attempts not only to manage
challenging behaviour, but also attempts to
change it as it arises - Before we attempt to change a behaviour we must
try to establish the cause - Rather than simply give in to demands we should
attempt to offer alternatives first - Low arousal is exemplified by a firm, assertive
approach - Giving in to a persons demand in order to avoid
an incident is not OK if it could potentially
cause harm to the person in the long-term.
23My Objectives
- To continue to teach staff the virtues of
following the low arousal approach to reduce
challenging behaviour in autism - To introduce a competency framework to aid staff
development to move on from the current practice
of simply awarding staff attendance certificates
24The End
- Thank you and any Questions?