Developmental Psychology

1
Developmental Psychology
HODGES AND TIZARD (1989)
2
Attachment theory

• The theory
• That emotional deprivation in young children may
  have serious and long lasting effects

3
Attachment theory

• John Bowlby (WHO 1946)
• The maternal deprivation hypothesis
• That children who are deprived of maternal care
  during the critical phase of their development
  (early childhood) will suffer irreversible
  psychological damage

4
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• The method
• A LONGITUDINAL STUDY

5
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• The participants
• 23 children aged 16
• who had been placed in an institution when they
  were less than 4 months old

6
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• The institution
• had a policy which insisted that carers did not
  form attachments to the children
• before the age of 4 the children had, on average,
  had 50 carers

7
The participant groups

• 11 restored to their biological parents
• 12 who were adopted by age of 4 years

8
The control groups

• Control group 1 one 16 year old in London school
  matched with participant for age, sex, position
  in the family, one or two parent family,
• Control group 2 a same age sex school friend

9

HOW WAS THE DATA COLLECTED?

• Interview with participant
• interview with mother and/or father
• self report self difficulties questionnaire
• questionnaire to teachers about relationships
  with peers and teachers
• The Rutter B scale screening for psychiatric
  problems

10
FINDINGS

• Relationships with family
• Adopted group- as closely attached as control
  group
• Restored group- LESS likely to be closely
  attached, LESS cuddly harder to give affection
  to
• LESS involved with family

11
FINDINGS

• PEER relationships (compared to controls) BOTH
  groups
• less likely to have a special friend
• less likely to be part of a crowd
• less popular with others
• MORE quarrelsome,
• MORE likely to be bullies

12
FINDINGS

• Other adults (non- family)
• BOTH groups - MORE attention seeking
• RESTORED - more aggressive

13
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• The findings in brief
• ALL the ex-institutional children
• were more adult orientated
• less likely to have a special friend
• less likely to turn to peers for support

14
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• The findings in brief
• BUT
• Within the family the adopted group and the
  controls were the most similar

15
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• The independent variable (IV)
• The group of the participant
• Ex-institutional (ADOPTED OR RESTORED)
• Matched control
• School comparison

16
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• The dependent variable (IV)
• The responses to the questionnaires and
  assessments
• relationships with family, peers and teachers

17
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• There are FIVE possible explanations
• 1st explanation
• Class related - the adopted families were more
  middle class (better off financially) than the
  families of the restored children

18
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• There are FIVE possible explanations
• 2nd explanation
• Did the adopted children suffer from poor self
  esteem, as a result of being adopted, which
  affects outside relationships?

19
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• There are FIVE possible explanations
• 3rd explanation
• The adoptive parents put MORE effort into the
  relationship explains why adopteds had good
  relationships with parents but not with peers and
  why restored had difficulty with both

20
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• There are FIVE possible explanations
• 4th explanation
• That the ability to form affectionate
  relationships with peers IS affected by early
  life emotional deprivation. Thus adopteds able
  to recover the family relationships but NOT with
  peers

21
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• There are FIVE possible explanations
• 5th explanation
• That ex-institutional children LAG BEHIND the
  controls (normals) in emotional development, and
  that they may catch up later

22
Hodges Tizard (1989)

• There is another explanation not put forward by
  Hodges Tizard
• That the parents of the restored children felt
  guilty because their children had been
  institutionalised, and that the restored children
  were resentful at having been institutionalised
  while their siblings had not been