Title: INTRODUCTION TO VALUE ADDED TAX VAT
1 REFORM Project, USAID/India
Workshop on Macroeconomic Analysis and Policy
2Globalization The New Economic
OrderPresentation byDr. Pawan K
AggarwalDeputy Chief of Party and Senior Advisor
(Tax Policy)REFORM Project, USAID IndiaNew
DelhiWorkshop on Macroeconomic Analysis and
Policy Mo3-PKA-Jha-New Eco Order
3Coverage
- General Agreement on Tariff and Trade GATT
(1947-1995) - World Trade Organization WTO (since 1995)
- Washington Consensus (since 1989)
- Concluding remarks
4GATT (1947-1995)
- GATT was established in 1947 to oversea
international trade with a view to create an
environment of free trade - GATT negotiations were conducted in sessions
referred to as Rounds - GATT held 8 rounds of negotiations
- From the first in 1947, through the Uruguay round
of 1986
5GATT (1947-1995)
- The main achievements of the first 7 rounds are
- Reduction of tariff rates among industrial
countries - From an average of 40 to 5
- 9 of the 10 disputes that were referred to GATT
were settled satisfactorily, discreetly, without
publicity - The volume of trade in manufactured goods
multiplied 20-fold
6GATT (1947-1995)
- The Uruguay round (1986) Its main achievements
are - Further reduction of tariff rates in a phased
manner - Evolving new international rules for
- Trade in services and agriculture, and
- Protection of intellectual properties
- Agreement for phasing out multifiber arrangement
covering textiles and clothing - Establishing antidumping laws
7WTO (since 1995)
- On 1 January 1995, WTO replaced the GATT
Secretariat - This replaced the practice of periodic rounds by
a permanent process of reviewing the rules of
international trade - By February 1997, there were 129 WTO
member-countries - In addition, 31 countries had requested for
membership - India is member of WTO
8WTO (since 1995)
- In February 1997, there was a major trade and
investment liberalization break-through - 70 countries made an agreement that will cover
95 of the worlds telecommunications business - It ends state run monopolies and lifts
restrictive regulations - It was expected to
- Lower consumer costs
- Expand telephone service area
- Improve access to internet and satellite services
9Washington consensus (since 1989)
- It is a package of 10 reform proposals believed
to be developed for promoting economic growth in
Latin America - It was first presented by John Williamson in
1989, and expected to be adopted in 1989 - The reform package was also summarized by the
World Bank in its year 2000 Poverty Report - The package is based mainly on 3 ideologies
- Macroeconomic discipline
- A market economy
- Openness to the world (e.g., in respect of trade
and FDI)
10Washington consensus (since 1989)
- The reform proposals are
- Fiscal policy discipline
- Primarily to check large deficits
- Redirection of public spending
- Focus on pro-poor spending
- Spending on education, health and infrastructure
- Tax reform
- Broad tax base with moderate tax rates
11Washington consensus (since 1989)
- The reform proposals are
- 4. Interest rates
- Should be market determined
- Positive (but moderate) in real terms
- 5. Competitive exchange rates
- Trade liberalization
- Replacement of quantitative restrictions with low
and uniform tariffs - Openness to foreign direct investment
- Technology, prices, growth
12Washington consensus (since 1989)
- The reform proposals are
- Privatization of state enterprises
- State monopolies, efficiency
- Brings benefits when done properly
- Transfer of assets to privileged elite for a
fraction of their true value needs to be avoided - Deregulation
- Abolition of regulations that impede entry or
exit - Regulations designed for safety or environmental
reasons to continue
13Washington consensus (since 1989)
- The reform proposals are
- Legal security for property rights
- This was primarily about providing the informal
sector with the ability to gain property rights
at acceptable cost
14Washington consensus (since 1989)
- Towards adoption of the Consensus
- In the early 1990s, many countries, especially in
Latin America, attempted to implement an agenda
similar to the Consensus - Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Costa Rica, Dominical Republic, Ecuador, El
Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, India, Mexico,
Morocco, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru, Tunisia,
Uruguay, Zambia
15Washington consensus (since 1989)
- Towards adoption of the Consensus
- North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
- The three North American countries (US, Maxico
and Canada) agreed to gradually phase out or
sharply reduce tariffs on foreign goods - A policy perfectly in line with the ideals of the
Consensus - US President George W. Bush continues to support
NAFTA
16Washington consensus (since 1989)
- Towards adoption of the Consensus
- Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade
Agreement (DR-CAFTA) - US administration is currently negotiating an
agreement similar to NAFTA with the Dominican
Republic and Central America - Countries currently opposed to the consensus
include - Argentina, Brazil, Cuba, Venezuela
17Washington consensus (since 1989)
- Achievements/Failures
- Most Latin American countries continue to
struggle with high poverty, unemployment/underempl
oyment, and low growth - Countries such as El Salvador and Uruguay have
shown some positive signs of economic development - Chile has been a success story
- However, according to Joseph Stiglitz, Chile
success story owes a lot to the state ownership
of key industries and currency interventions
stabilizing capital flows
18Washington consensus (since 1989)
- Critical evaluation
- It is not a strategy to avoid crisis
- Economic growth effected due to series of crisis
that emerging markets have suffered - Inappropriate associated policies (not required
by the Consensus) - Opening up the capital account prematurely
- Letting money flood in and overvalue the currency
19Washington consensus (since 1989)
- Critical evaluation
- Incomplete set of reform strategies
- Failure to undertake labour market reforms and
strengthening of institutions - Excessively narrow objective
- Acclerating growth without worsening income
distribution - Birdsall and Torre (2001) gives a set of 10
reform proposals intended to improve income
distribution without reducing growth - This package can be viewed as a complement to the
Consensus
20Washington consensus (since 1989)
- Critical evaluation
- Western countries that urge liberalization on
developing countries maintain trade restrictions
on the goods that developing countries are in a
position to export to them - The hypocrisy of Western countries
- Some leftist critics of trade liberalization,
such as Noam Chomsky and Naomi Klein, see it as a
way of throwing open the labor market of an
underdeveloped economy to exploitation by a more
developed economy
21Washington consensus (since 1989)
- Critical evaluation
- The Consensus is widely held by many economists
to be a 'suicidal policy' if implemented when an
economy is weak. - It might succeed if implemented during a period
of rapid growth
22Concluding remarks
- A reform package may not suit all countries, or
at all times, or under all circumstances - What works under rapid growth might fail under
crisis - Reforms ancillary to a reform package could be as
important as the package itself - These need to be identified and adopted
- A move towards free trade is unavoidable
- Time and speed need to be determined based on
circumstances of individual countries
23Concluding remarks
- India is member of WTO and contemplating
- Further reductions in tariff on imports
- Free trade zones such as SAARC
- Rapid growth in inflow as well as outflow of FDI
- Privatization of state enterprises
24Thank YouPawan K. Aggarwal