International financial reporting standard (IFRS) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

International financial reporting standard (IFRS)

Description:

The BHF Southern African Conference 22-25 July'07 Sun City ... How does it effect the medical schemes? ... Not deducted from investment income ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:124
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Lou566
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: International financial reporting standard (IFRS)


1
International financial reporting standard (IFRS)
  • What is IFRS?
  • How does it effect the medical schemes?
  • Issues arising out 2005 and 2006 Annual Financial
    Statement reporting
  • Matters for attention in 2007 year.

2
What is IFRS?
  • Statements issued by the International Accounting
    Standards Board
  • South African Accounting Standards follow the
    IFRS framework
  • Certain organisations are obliged to report ito
    IFRS.
  • Auditors are required to report if auditees have
    complied with the IFRS statements in their annual
    financial statements

3
What is IFRS?
  • IFRS comprises 8 standards at this stage and is
    growing.
  • Reports are expected to be presented ito the
    statements from effective dates.
  • IFRS4 for example is being introduced in phases.
    First phase applied from 2005.
  • There are 16 International Accounting Standards
    which also have to be complied with covering
    different aspects of accounting and business
    transactions.

4
How does this effect medical Schemes?
  • Act requires that annual financial statements are
    prepared in terms of generally accepted
    accounting practices.
  • These practices include IAS and IFRS statements
    of accounting
  • Bill has been drafted to require medical schemes
    to report in terms of International Financial
    Reporting Standards which therefore includes IAS
    and IFRS statements.

5
How does this effect medical Schemes?
  • Prior to 2004 annual financial statements were
    prepared in terms of South African Standards of
    GAAP
  • 2005 and 2006 were prepared ito IFRS and IAS
    statements
  • The bill, if enacted as drafted, will require
    schemes to continue reporting ito IFRS and IAS.

6
Issues arising out of 2005 and 2006 reporting
  • Medical schemes are classified as insurance
    businesses and must report ito IFRS4 which
    applies to insurance business.
  • Each contract between a member and the scheme is
    classified as an insurance contract.
  • Each provider contract (eg capitation) in which
    risk is transferred from the scheme to the
    provider is classified as re-insurance.

7
How does this effect medical Schemes?
  • There are 2 types of managed care costs
  • Ones in which providers are paid for services
    rendered to beneficiaries
  • Ones in which the managed care organisation
    provides a service aimed at managing the
    provision of services such as pre-authorisation
    and case management.
  • The first is treated as a claims cost
  • The second could be treated as a cost of managing
    claims or as administration costs.

8
How does this effect medical Schemes?
  • Capitation fees and arrangements where risk is
    transferred to a provider group does not remove
    the ultimate responsibility for the provision of
    care from the scheme.
  • If the provider is unable to provide contracted
    services then the scheme will have to pay another
    provider for providing the same services.

9
How does this effect medical Schemes?
  • SAICA and CMS have jointly prepared an accounting
    guide to assist the schemes in preparing their
    AFS.
  • In 2005 a sample set of accounts was included in
    the guide
  • SAICA may not ito their arrangements with the
    International Accounting Standards Board
    interpret the IFRS statements.
  • Guideline for 2006 therefore did not include a
    sample set of accounts.

10
How does this effect medical Schemes?
  • Schemes required to interpret the IFRS
    themselves.
  • Administrators requested assistance from scheme
    auditors in interpretation
  • Different auditors had different approaches
  • Resulted in a variety of Income statements, in
    particular, being presented to members.
  • CMS rejected AFS of many schemes as their
    interpretation differed from that of the schemes

11
Issues arising from2005 AFS reporting
  • Accounting policies. Use relevant only.
  • Offsetting of fees paid to asset managers against
    investment income not allowed.
  • Materiality of expenses - disclosure
  • Interest paid on savings to be disclosed
    separately. Not deducted from investment income
  • Treatment of realised and unrealised profits and
    losses on investments

12
Issues arising from2005 AFS reporting
  • Correlation between the Balance Sheet, Income
    Statement, Cash Flow and the notes at line item
    level
  • Wash sale transactions
  • Risk management report
  • Related party transactions with particular
    emphasis on trustees

13
Issues arising 2006 AFS reporting
  • Alternate adopted by some schemes as rejected by
    the CMS (alternate 1)
  • Risk measurement in the income statement.
  • Gross contributions
  • Savings contributions
  • Net contributions received
  • Expense incurred in transferring risk to a
    providers. Capitation agreements.
  • Contribution for risk carried by the scheme

14
Issues arising 2006 AFS reporting
  • Claims expenses (alternate1 )
  • Gross claims incurred
  • Less paid by savings account members
  • Net claims
  • IBNR adjustment ( prior year and current year)
  • Plus recovery under risk transfer arrangements
  • Claims incurred by the scheme for own risk
  • Less recovery under risk transfer arrangements
  • Managed care management services (costs incurred
    in managing claims)
  • Claims expense

15
Issues arising 2006 AFS reporting
  • Alternate 2 adopted by some schemes accepted by
    the CMS
  • Gross contributions
  • Less savings portion
  • Net contributions
  • Claims Expense
  • Gross claims incurred
  • Less paid by savings account members
  • Net claims
  • IBNR adjustment ( prior year and current year)
  • Plus recovery under risk transfer arrangements
  • Claims incurred by the scheme

16
Issues arising 2006 AFS reporting
  • Risk Transfer Arrangements
  • Payments made to providers under risk transfer
    arrangements
  • Less Recovery under risk transfer arrangements
  • Net effect of Risk Transfer Arrangements
  • Administration
  • Managed care costs management services

17
Issues arising 2006 AFS reporting
  • Trustees as Related parties.
  • Trustees are related parties
  • Trustee report required to reflect by trustee
    -remuneration paid to the trustee and expenses
    incurred on his/her behalf in fulfilling duties
    as trustees
  • AFS reflect the same in total and not by trustee
  • AFS also to include aggregate membership
    contributions received from trustee for himself
    and dependents plus any family member who is a
    member of the scheme in their own right
  • as well as aggregate benefit payments made by the
    scheme on trustee families behalf.

18
Matters for attention in 2007 year
  • SAICA and CMS to prepare a guideline for 2007
    year.
  • Need to prepare guideline which reflects
    alternate approaches to the interpretation of
    IFRS which are acceptable to Schemes, Scheme
    Auditors and CMS.
  • Guideline to take into account the new IFRS7
  • Increased disclosure around financial instrument
    IAS32 and insurance risk IFRS4.
  • Financial managers and auditors to meet and
    discuss the implications so as to reduce pressure
    at year end.

19
IFRS
  • QUESTIONS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com