Considerations when adopting Mathematical software into Undergraduate courses - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Considerations when adopting Mathematical software into Undergraduate courses

Description:

'The Non-Use of Computers in Engineering Science Courses' ... Favourable student licensing terms? Mathcad. Productive and interactive? Mathcad. Tend to favour: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: coli51
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Considerations when adopting Mathematical software into Undergraduate courses


1
Considerations when adoptingMathematical
software intoUndergraduate courses
  • Colin Campbell
  • University of Waterloo
  • and
  • TechnicalMastery.com

2
Outline
  • Adoption Considerations
  • Typical Adoption Pattern
  • Somewhat atypical Waterloo
  • Comparison
  • Maple and MATLAB
  • Maple and Mathcad
  • MATLAB and Mathcad
  • Case Study
  • Circuit Simulation

3
The Non-Use of Computers in Engineering Science
Courses
  • "Across the country, computers are usually not
    used effectively in undergraduate ... courses.
    Often, they are not used at all.
  • Problem-solving approaches and calculation
    methods are little influenced by ...
    computers.
  • http//www.asee.org/jee/papers/00220.PDF

4
AdoptionConsiderations
Tend to favour
  • Over-whelming functionality? Maple MATLAB
  • Used in profs research? Maple MATLAB
  • Big investment already in program? Maple MATLAB
  • Text book include exercises? Maple MATLAB
  • Easy to mark? Excel, C
  • Industry dominance? MATLAB
    Excel
  • Students know already? Excel
  • Might improve course evaluations? Mathcad
  • Favourable student licensing terms? Mathcad
  • Productive and interactive? Mathcad

5
Typical Adoption Pattern
T
MATLAB Lin Alg
Num Meth Controls SIMULINK
Eng/Sci Mathcad Lin Alg Calc 1-4 Diff Eqs Num
Meth Controls VISSIM
Eng/Sci Maple Calc 1-4 Diff Eqs
Eng/Sci
Excel Lin Alg

Eng/Sci C,
VB Num Meth
Eng/Sci
6
Waterloos Adoption Pattern (atypical)
W
  • MATLAB Lin Alg Num Meth Controls
    SIMULINK Eng/Sci
  • Mathcad Lin Alg Calc 3 Diff Eqs Num Meth
    Controls VISSIM Eng/Sci
  • Maple Calc 3 Diff Eqs
    Eng/Sci
  • Excel Lin Alg

    Eng/Sci
  • C, VB Num Meth Eng/Sci

Note ? in Calculus 1, 2, 4
7
Who ya gonna call?
Maple
Mathcad
MATLAB
8
Who ya gonna call?
Maple
Mathcad
MATLAB
9
Who ya gonna call?
Maple
C Fortran
Mathcad
MATLAB
10
Who ya gonna call?
Maple
Excel
C Fortran
Mathcad
MATLAB
11
Compare Maple and MATLAB
  • Maple has better
  • User interface worksheet vs. command-line
  • Selection of mathematical functions
  • Symbolics usability
  • GUI development Maplets vs. GUIDE
  • Animation higher level .?. easier
  • MATLAB has better
  • Language for data operations
  • Graphics control and appearance
  • Selection of add-on toolboxes (e.g. Controls)

12
Compare Maple and Mathcad
  • Maple has better
  • Selection of mathematical functions
  • Symbolics, esp. for Diff Eqs
  • Graphics implicitplot3d
  • Animation one-step vs. several
  • Mathcad has better
  • User interface mathematical, immediate
  • GUI controls more accessible, e.g. slider
  • Data import/export (e.g. Excel, databases)

13
Compare MATLAB and Mathcad
  • MATLAB has better
  • Graphics appearance
  • Automation abilities
  • Selection of add-on toolboxes (e.g. Controls)
  • Mathcad has better
  • User interface mathematical, immediate
  • GUI controls more accessible, e.g. slider
  • Symbolics usability

14
Case Study Simulate Circuit
Overall look and feel
  • Maple
  • Mathcad
  • MATLAB

Mathematics Programming
Mathematics
Programming
15
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com