Title: eValue8 Community Forum:
1Five Years of Adverse Events Reporting What
Have we Learned?
February 2, 2009
eValue8 Community Forum Patient Safety Diane
Rydrych Director, Adverse Health Events
Program Minnesota Department of Health Julie
Apold Director, Patient Safety Minnesota Hospital
Association
2Reported Events
3Reported events, Oct. 2007-Oct 2008
312 Events
122 Bedsores
95 Falls
37 Objects left in body
4Impact of definitional changes
5How serious are these events?
18 deaths, 98 serious disabilities
6Why do they happen?
- Communication
- Written, oral communication or lack
- Handoffs and transitions
- Organizational culture
- Speaking up
- Trust
- Policies
- Lack of clarity
- Lack of a policy
7Efforts to Prevent Events
- Focus on top four event types
- Wrong Body Part Surgery
- Retained Foreign Objects
- Falls
- Pressure Ulcers
8Determine Best Practices
- Minnesota Protocols Addressing AHE
- Pressure Ulcer Assessment and Prevention
- Foreign Object Retention
- Surgical Protocol
- Labor and delivery Protocol
- Safe Site Surgery Protocol
- Protocol builds on Joint Commission protocol
- Revision includes signing of site by surgeon with
initials - Falls Prevention Protocol
9Implementation
- Protocol ? Practice
- Statewide approach to implementing best practices
- Calls-to-Action
- Safe Skin
- Safe from Falls
- Safe Site
- Safe Count
10 Calls-to-Action - Structure
- Implementation roadmaps
- Best Practice Steps
- AHE Learnings
- SAFE Infrastructure
- Teams, data, staff and patient education
- SKIN, Falls, Site, Count Patient Care Bundle
11Calls-to-Action - Process
- CEO Call to Participate
- Kick-off Event
- Baseline Survey Data
- Plan 1st Quarter Actions
- Submit Roadmap data quarterly and develop actions
for each quarter - Calls scheduled every other month
- Listserv
- Toolkit
12Call-to-Action - Participation
- Safe Skin 93 Hospitals
- Safe from Falls 108 Hospitals
- Safe Site 113 Hospitals ASC
- Safe Count 64 Hospitals
13Call-to-Action Results
- Of participating facilities
- 91 process for every 2-hour repositioning for
at-risk patients (51 baseline) - 94 have an interdisciplinary falls prevention
team (55 baseline) - 97 have a system to alert staff to pt risk for
falls - 90 have a Safe Site physician champion (33
baseline) - 92 have a process to support any member of the
team calling for a hard stop (56 baseline)
14Progress on Calls to Action
15Cycle of Learning Safe Site
- In 2008, information from reported events led to
- Statewide recommendations and implementation
support for conducting an effective time-out
process - Specific recommendations for marking anesthesia
procedures such as regional blocks - Collaboration between hospitals and clinics to
develop a more standardized approach for
scheduling and verifying procedures.
165 Years Later What have we Learned?
- Collaboration Works
- No re-inventing the wheel
- Colleague Support
- Thinking outside the box
- Targeted implementation Works
- Laying out an implementation plan
- Making adjustments over time
- Transparency Works
- Tracking progress
- Sharing experiences moves safety efforts forward
exponentially
175 Years Later What have we Learned?
- This is hard work!
- Digging deeper is imperative
- Long-term vs. Short-term efforts
- We have addressed the low-hanging fruit left
with the tough stuff - Culture
- Physician Engagement
- Team Work
- Human Factors
18- After all this
-
- ....are we safer?
195 Year Evaluation
- Focus Groups
- Hospitals, ASCs
- Online Survey
- Patient safety and QI officers/managers
- CEO Interviews
- Large/small/medium hospitals
20Are we safer?
21Prioritizing Patient Safety
22Best Practices
23- Its really raised the bar. Im proud to say
that.
24Sharing Information
- Now I always ask the question, Have you talked
to your colleagues around town about ways theyve
been successful in this area? The ability to
dialogue was made easier its no longer a taboo
topic.
25Sharing Information
- (The reporting system) was able to identify
issues before they happened so when something
had happened at five facilities but it hadnt
happened at yours yet, it gave us an opportunity
to address issues before they even occurred.
26Leadership Involvement
- (The report) certainly is a required
conversation every CEO must have with the board
every year. If there wasnt a good conversation
about patient safety and quality with the board
every year before, this required it.
27Leadership Involvement
- I would never have broached that subject
patient safety myself if the law hadnt been
passed I wouldnt have brought it to the board
level. - The board spends as much time on safety as on
finance.
28Leadership Involvement
- Starting with myself, Ive changed. Before this
time, I thought we were doing a great job, we had
a quality person in place. But I really sat up
and paid attention towhat a difference this
makes in the quality of care people receive.
Were now talking about it at every level in the
organization, everyone from housekeepers and
dietary to leadership and board members.
29Overall Assessment
- The law opened peoples consciousness up to
looking at things we wouldnt have looked at in a
systematic way before.