Consistency of Teacher Judgement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Consistency of Teacher Judgement

Description:

Plan which uses valid and reliable data. Training school and individual. Common understanding. Collaboration in planning,teaching and learning. and assessment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:251
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Defa135
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Consistency of Teacher Judgement


1
  • Consistency of Teacher Judgement
  • Overview of Module
  • Why is Consistency of Teacher Judgement
  • important ?
  • Establishing an environment of consistency
  • Consistency strategies
  • Student Work Samples or Moderation

2
  • Consistency of Teacher Judgement

Involves on-balance, evidence-based decisions
about students progress towards the
achievements of standards articulated
through the language of Syllabus Outcomes and
Foundation Statements
3
  • Why is consistency of teacher judgement
    important?

Activity Brainstorm to answer this question
4
  • Consistency and Comparability in Assessment
  • Ensures there is a fairness for students across
    class and schools
  • Gives teachers, parents and students confidence
    in the validity of judgement reached in schools
  • Enhances teachers knowledge and confidence in
    their own assessment
  • Establishes a basis for trust in the judgement of
    other teachers

5
  • Consistency and Comparability in Assessment
  • Helps to develop a collective view on assessment
    and a shared expertise in the planning of
    teaching and assessment
  • Promotes an agreed understanding of standards,
    expectations and student achievement throughout
    the school
  • Ensures that all learners are provided with fair
    and reliable information about their learning

6
  • Consistent Judgement
  • With consistent judgements we can fairly and
    accurately monitor student progress and share
    information with others.

7
  • Establishing an Environment of Consistency
    Characteristics
  • Teachers become confident
  • Sufficient time is given for teacher discussions
  • Agreed system of recording
  • Plan which uses valid and reliable data
  • Training school and individual
  • Common understanding
  • Collaboration in planning,teaching and learning
  • and assessment
  • Range of appropriate assessment practices
  • Teachers discuss student work samples

8
  • Consistent Strategy
  • Activity
  • Planning and Assessing Collaboratively
  • Share Understandings About Assessment
  • Use a Common Assessment Task
  • Comparing Samples of Student Work
  • Developing a Common Criteria Sheet

9
  • Consistent Judgement
  • Activity

On the Aspect of Assessment form, examine your
current practice, highlighting the aspects that
you are currently doing well and areas that need
development
10
  • Consistent Judgement
  • Activity

How to Develop Consistency of Teacher Judgement.
11
  • What is moderation?
  • Moderation is a process where teachers
  • compare judgements to either confirm or
  • adjust them
  • Involves close collaboration to establish a
  • shared understanding of what
  • achievement of an outcome looks like and
  • whether or not the student has
  • demonstrated achievement of the outcome

12
Develop common beliefs and understandings
Looking at outcomes and indicators
Sharing
Consistency
What does moderation mean to you ?
Collaboration
Monitoring
Foundation Statements
Looking at work samples
Assessment
13
  • What purposes can moderation serve in
    supporting consistency in teacher judgement?
  • Through moderation teachers can
  • Develop shared understanding of standards
  • Develop accuracy and reliability in making
  • judgements
  • Ensure judgements are equitable
  • Strengthen the value of teachers judgement
  • Develop well targeted teaching programs

14
  • Analysis of Work Samples

Looking at student work has the potential to
expand teachers opportunity to learn, to
cultivate a professional community that is both
willing and able to inquire into practice, and to
focus school-based teacher conversations directly
on the improvement of teaching and learning.
(Phi Delta Kappan, November 2003)
15
  • Individual Moderation
  • Select learner achievement information from
    several sources
  • Compare the information gathered by the teacher
    with information from the Board of Studies
    Annotated Work Samples
  • Make a judgement
  • Consider
  • How your teaching can address what you have
    understood about learners needs.

16
  • Process
  • Using the Foundation Statements, outcomes,
    indicators and work sample provided, comment on
    students knowledge,skills and understanding
  • (By yourself)
  • 2. Sort the samples according to how well each
    has achieved the outcome (With a partner)

17
  • Process
  • Discuss and compare your judgements of the work
    samples (in groups)
  • 4. Using the common grade scale select the work
    samples that demonstrate the qualities and/or
    characteristics of the description of a
    particular grade (in groups)

18
  • Process

5. Discuss and compare judgements of all the work
samples for the KLA 6. Using the common grade
scale group the collection of work samples
according to each grade 7. Does the quality of
each collection of work, on balance,typically
describe what might be expected of a student who
is on target to receive that grade at the Stage?
19
  • Meaningful Feedback
  • Linked to student achievement in relation to
    Syllabus Outcomes and Foundation Statements
  • Provides students with information about how well
    they addressed the criteria for the experience
  • Shows students their level of achievement
  • Indicates areas for improvement

20
  • Meaningful Feedback Activity

Describe what strategies can be used to provide
meaningful feedback in order for students to gain
an understanding about their strengths and areas
that need development
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com