A framework for thinking about mechanisms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A framework for thinking about mechanisms

Description:

Applying criteria for assessment to the holding tank (2 s) ... Available, but flagged, in discovery. No comments automatic ingestion ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: pag94
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A framework for thinking about mechanisms


1
A framework for thinking about mechanisms
  • Range of possible implementation mechanisms
  • Some criteria for assessing various mechanisms
  • Holding tank description
  • Applying criteria for assessment to the holding
    tank (2 slides)

2
Possible Mechanisms for Improving Quality by
Resource Lifecycle
  • More focused selection criteria from filter to
    guidelines
  • Co-development of collections with user
    communities
  • Development of thematic collections
    responsibility, ownership, persistence
  • Pre-cataloging review of gray cases
  • Encapsulation of context at design times wrap
    questionable in content guiding use
  • QA of resources in Broad Collection
  • Review board for marginal cases
  • Holding Tank
  • Annotation services / Peer reviewing
  • De-accessioning request form

3
Some Criteria for Assessing Mechanisms (in random
order)
  • Technical implementation
  • Social implementation
  • Community Participation opportunities for versus
    required to be successful
  • Cataloging and QA Cost
  • Maintenance Cost
  • Scalability
  • Preserving annotations during harvesting
  • Proactively supports collection development
  • Helps to create a collection that follows the
    selection criteria

4
Holding Tank Description
  • Post-cataloging
  • Provisional accessioning (30 days)
  • Whats new area
  • Available, but flagged, in discovery
  • No comments automatic ingestion
  • Comments someone has to review and pass a
    verdict

5
Applying Criteria to Holding Tank
  • Technical Implementation
  • Basic technical substrate is being implemented to
    support whats new in CRS
  • Social Implementation
  • Issues with asking collections (including NSDL-
    funded collections) to internalize DLESE
    rejections to support reharvesting
  • How are holding tank reviewers mobilized to
    respond to new resources
  • Registration
  • Commenting
  • How are comments assessed and by whom?

6
Applying Criteria to Holding Tank (part 2)
  • Full cataloging and QA efforts invested in
    resources that are ultimately rejected
  • Maintenance cost for 30 day holding period (e.g.
    applying link checking)
  • Scalability O(n) depends on applying to all
    collections vs. community collection
  • Provisional items unavailable for harvesting
  • No explicit support for building collections
  • Depends on the successful implementation of the
    mechanisms
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com