Command

1
Command technical authority for management of
installations
VADM Bob Conway, CNIC http//CNIC.NAVY.MIL https/
/cnicportal.cnic.navy.mil
2
CNIC Size and Scope
23 Flag / SES Direct Reports
13 Regions 79 Installations 885 Fence Lines
103B PRV (Bldg, Structure, Utilities)
54,590 bldgs
330M Sq. Ft. bldgs
55.9K pers. military 19.9K civilians 36K
(Dec 06)
7 of Navy TOA
8B
resources (9 appropriations)
3
CNICEvolution, Current Status and Strategic
Future
PAST
PRESENT
FUTURE
Reforming
Transforming
Operationalizing


1993
1994
1998
2002-2003
2003-2004
2004-2006
2006-2007
TBD
April 2006
Consolidate Resource Sponsors
Establish N46 Ashore Readiness
Reduce 18 claimants to 8 Establish 16 Regions
SECNAV Workload Validation 8 claimants to 1
Standup of CNI
Program Centric Organization Regional
Consolidation
Alignment OPNAV, CFFC, Joint Staff, Regional
Commands
Reduce facilities footprint tenant commands
Expanded PPV
Incremental Transformation
Lean processes across the organization
CNIC 3 Star Command
PAST
PRESENT
FUTURE
PROS
CONS

• Single vice baron resource sponsors
• Fewer claimants
• Command technical authority for
• management of installations Single process
• owner
• Consistency
• Staff consolidation
• Echelon IIs focus on prime missions

• BOS wedges at standup (BSRT, Skunkworks)
  -263M/yr (shift of SRM to BOS averaged approx.
  300M/yr 04-05-06)
• Imbalanced asset transfer from 8 divesting
  claimants (NAVIG 2/04 11K MILPERS, undetermined
  number of CIVPERS positions moved from Base Ops
  to Mission prior to transfer to CNIC, potentially
  thousands of mission billets doing BOS functions)
• Health masked by SRM, supplementals, COW,
  Mid-year, sweep ups, etc.

3
4
CNICEvolution, Current Status and Strategic
Future
Reforming

• Putting the C in CNIC
• Shift to Capabilities vice service levels
• Enhanced Business Practices
• Fiscal Accountability and Enterprise Alignment

Transforming

• HQ through Installation Reorganization
  Alignment
• Enhanced Command/Control (C2)
• Increased Speed to Reaction Response

Operationalizing

• Balance of Business Operations NMETS
• Navy Installations Ops Ctr Regional Ops Ctrs
• Sea/Shore Seam Removal
• Fleet Response Plan (FRP) Shore Response
• Plan (SRP) - Extension of the Fleet

5
Commanders Intent and CNIC Mission
CNIC is the Navy's Command, Technical Authority,
and Single Process Owner for Shore Installation
Management

• COMMANDERS INTENT
• Enhancing the Navy's Operating Concept through
  Enterprise alignment of all shore installation
  support to the Fleet, Fighter, and Family
• CNIC MISSION
• Enable and sustain Fleet, Fighter and Family
  readiness through consistent, standardized, and
  reliable shore support (as a supporting command).
  Direct the ashore battlespace in support of
  homeland defense and disaster relief operations
  (as a supported command).
• SINGLE FLEET DRIVEN METRIC (SFDM )
• Installations Ready to Support Taskings.
• VISION
• Navy Installations operate as an extension of
  Fleet Combat Capabilities

Operationalizing
6
Fleet, Fighter, and Family

• Fleet, Fighter, Family Alliance

• CFFC CNP CNIC Platforms - People - Places

• Family Preparedness Navy Family Alliance

• Operationalize
• Tie to Fleet Readiness / NMETS

• Navy Families
• Self-sufficient
• Supported by relevant
• programs
• Unique needs met in times
• of crisis

CNP Chairman -
Develops policy, strategy and - funding
requirements
SUPPORTED
CNIC Supporting Commander -
SUPPORTING
Delivers individual and family - readiness
programs
Note Gradient shading indicates both Supported
and Supporting Command
CFFC/CPF Supporting Commanders -
Executes through chain - o f -command
7
Transforming
CNIC HQ
Form Follows Functions
Commander Navy Installations Command (N00)
Regional Commanders

• Operationalize HQ Staff to achieve
• Reorg. AFTER re- defined functions
• Region Installation alignment with HQ
• Enhanced speed to reaction/execution
• Elimination of Sea/Shore functional seams
• Alignment of Support to Fleet, Fighter, Family

Executive Director Navy Installations Command
(N01)
Deputy Commander Navy Installations Command
(N02)

• Functional alignment w/ OPNAV, CFFC,
• Joint Staff (N codes)

Chief Operating Officer (N03)
Comptroller/CRO (N08)
8
CNIC N142/3 Top 5

• Aligning HQ/Region/Installation
• Fiscal Baselining of programs
• BRAC impacts
• Validating requirements
• 5. Refining the swim lanes

9
Strategic Alignment
MET BASED CAPABILITY READINESS REPORTING
MET BASED CAPABILITY READINESS REPORTING
N M E T L S
N M E T L S
D R R S - N
D R R S - N
10
Personnel Services (CNIC N14)

• Program Managers for three of 129 CNIC sub
  functions
• Pay and Personnel Administrative Support System
  (PASS)
• Shore Corrections
• Transient Personnel Units / Restricted Barracks

11
Whats Happening in N14

• PASS reorganization/consolidation
• Future Individual Personnel Processing System
  Organization study
• Evaluating possible combination of some or all of
  the Transient Personnel, Restricted Barracks,
  Mobilization/Demobilization Processing and
  Correctional Custody functions under one command.
• Status
• Current org and desired future state drafted.
• Gap analysis underway
• Final product complete late Aug 08

TPU Jacksonville pilot complete in Jan 07.
Change to TPU policy requested in Mar 07.
12
Individual Personnel Processing Command

• Pros
• Provides unity of effort
• Standardizes operation of restricted barracks
• Provides a home for CCUs affected by BRAC 2005
• Provides some surge capability for NMPSs
• Challenges
• Current seams
• Not all CCUs are affected
• Culture change

DRAFT Pre-decisional
13
Reporting Relationships

• EMPHASIS this is a notional reporting
  relationship
• Would standardize reporting and communication.

DRAFT Pre-decisional
14
Questions? CDR K. A. Reed DSN 288-4302 Comm
202.433.4302 Katharine.reed_at_navy.mil