Empirical Evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Empirical Evaluation

Description:

Experimental design. Need a system and subjects ... Experimental purpose. Reveal influence of independent variables on the dependent variables. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Irfan8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Empirical Evaluation


1
Empirical Evaluation
Designing user studies
2
Agenda
  • Questions
  • Exam 2 next Monday
  • Project Part 3
  • Experimental design
  • Wednesday understanding HCI statistics
  • Jason Brotherton

3
Project Part 3
  • Deciding on final design

4
Project Part 3
  • Creating evaluation plan

5
Working on Intuition
  • Some techniques use this
  • cognitive walkthrough
  • heuristic evaluation
  • formative exercises rely on this somewhat
  • We cannot always predict impact of systems on
    users before the system exists.

6
Why empirical studies?
  • Summative Quantitative
  • Requires resources
  • Wont other methods be more effective and less
    expensive?

7
Experimental design
  • Need a system and subjects
  • Controlled experiment to prove some relationship
    between users and system.

8
Experimental factors
  • Subjects
  • Variables
  • controlled / independent
  • measured / dependent
  • Hypothesis

9
Experimental condition
  • Determined by levels of independent variables.
  • Number of experimental conditions is important.

10
How many subjects?
  • Book advice
  • at least 10
  • Other advice
  • 6 subjects per experimental condition

11
Experimental purpose
  • Reveal influence of independent variables on the
    dependent variables.
  • Eliminate possibility of chance relationship.

12
The null hypothesis
  • The independent variables do not influence the
    dependent variables.
  • Statistical analysis aims to prove more than
    chance relationship.

13
Confidence statements
  • Goal of an experiment is to get gt95 confidence
    in significance of result
  • that is, null hypothesis disproved
  • OR, there is an influence
  • ORR, only 1 in 20 chance that difference occurred
    due to random chance

14
Subjects Experimental Conditions
  • Between-groups (randomized)
  • Each subject assigned to single experimental
    condition
  • Within-groups
  • Each subject tested on all conditions

15
Comparison
  • Between-groups
  • no learning effects
  • more subjects needed need careful subject
    selection
  • Within-groups
  • fewer subjects
  • potential learning, so mix ordering of conditions

16
Analyzing data
  • Relationship between analysis and experimental
    design
  • Look at data
  • Save data

17
Results possible
  • Is there a difference?
  • How big is the difference?
  • Accuracy of estimate

18
Advice
  • Data quality
  • avoid error bias
  • Data reliability
  • multiple observers, rules for measurement
  • Determine central tendency
  • mean, trimming, median, variance

19
Confounding factors
  • Controlling all the variables
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com