- PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Description:

Common / Shared Intel. Db1. Process Panel. Deconflict. SitViewer. Decision Desktop ... data. Other. Gao Obs. Gao. Gao Intel. Dbiv. 11. End of Presentation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: patrickbea
Category:
Tags: intel

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title:


1
Building on CoAX 2001 SuccessPatrick
Beautement, QinetiQ
  • Patrick Beautement, QinetiQ, pbeautement_at_qinetiq.c
    om
  • Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, PhD, Institute for Human and
    Machine Cognition, jbradshaw_at_ai.uwf.edu
  • Michael Kirton, PhD, QinetiQ, m.kirton_at_signal.qine
    tiq.com
  • Prof Austin Tate, Artificial Intelligence
    Applications Institute, a.tate_at_ed.ac.uk

2
Overview - CoAX Binni 2001
  • CoAX TIE seen as
  • successful,
  • still having momentum,
  • being a suitable core for any follow-on.
  • Aim of this briefing
  • explain what we did,
  • suggest how it can be exploited for 2002 demos.

3
Overview - Issues
  • Everyone understood the military context / value
    of all contributions (singly and collectively).
  • TIE aims clearly stated
  • overall (integrated agents - working
    collaboratively),
  • for each stage / demonstration,
  • for each partner (about 17).
  • Expressed in the CoAX scenario / overview
    document.
  • Success due to
  • mutual respect, goodwill and commitment,
  • good communication, shared vision /
    understanding,
  • willingness to be flexible / use RAD techniques,
  • technical competence / inventiveness.

4
Overview - Issues - Technical
  • Provision of working infrastructure
  • hardware / network / IP etc,
  • software / Grid / JVMs etc.
  • Integration tasks
  • agent message markup,
  • enabling interoperability between partners
    technical contributions,
  • ensuring technical contributions are compatible,
  • configuration management / versioning,
  • knowing how to run the software!

5
Overview - Issues - Staging (1)
  • Agreed aim / coherent story / 'so-what' factor
  • agreed approach to be used (live demo / screencam
    etc),
  • scenario / storyboard design,
  • agree staging (who, what, where, how and WHY!).
  • Scripts
  • technical script (s) / technical operators,
  • narrator's script (s) / narrator.
  • Presentations
  • scene-setting / overview presentation,
  • integrating partner's presentations.
  • Overview Handout(s).

6
Overview - Issues - Staging (2)
  • Rehearsals.
  • For the demonstration
  • stage management of
  • machines, projectors and screens (video
    switching),
  • narrators and operator co-ordination.
  • timings,
  • changeovers.
  • Fall-back options, eg
  • screencams,
  • PowerPoint engineering.

7
Overview - Issues - Follow-up
  • DVD / CD for distribution.
  • Posters.
  • Web-site maintenance.

8
(No Transcript)
9
Exploitation for 2002 ...
  • Agree the unified and coherent story that needs
    to be told
  • what is the military context?
  • what needs to proven / shown (metrics etc) and
    why?
  • how will it be done?
  • Give due attention to the
  • storyboarding / scripting / stage management,
  • integration.
  • Keep the technology in its place and use it to
    tell a militarily valid story.
  • Understand
  • the part to be played by each partner's
    contribution,
  • the overall architecture (and how it all fits
    together) ...

10
CoAX 2002 Demo - Agent Domains (Draft 30 Nov
2001)
GRID / Agent-enabled Infrastructure / Admin Tools
11
End of Presentation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com