Title: SERC Operator Training Y2k Status Update
1SERC Operator TrainingY2k Status Update
- SERC Operator Training Seminars
- Charleston, SC
- April, 1999
2Agenda
- SERC Y2k Organization
- Control Area and Operating Entity Plans
- Plan Assessment and Coordination
- SERC Risk Factors and Scenarios
- Mitigation Strategies
- System Studies
- Work Plan
- Interconnection and Continental Issues
- What this means to YOU
3SERC Y2k Organization
4SERC Y2k Task Force
- SERC Representation - John Troha
- Security Coordinator Representation
- Entergy - Francis Wang / Jim Case
- Southern - Raymond Vice (Chairman)
- TVA - James Regg, David Ashley
- VACAR North - Lou Roeder, Dan Desmond (Va Power)
- VACAR South - Brock Hennings / Scott Henry (Duke
Power) - Other participants
- CPL - Phil Creech
- NCEMC - Mike Featham, Tony Vincik, Ken Kroll
- Oglethorpe - Brad Leathers
- Santee Cooper - Linda Wilcox
- SCEG - Rocky Sease, Tommy Clawson, Jennifer
Taylor - Sonat Power Marketing - Gordon Scott
5Recent SERC Y2K Activities
- 12/1/98 SERC Y2K Task Force initial meeting
- 12/15/98 First draft of individual Y2K
contingency plans by SERC members - 12/21/98 - 12/31/98 Completed assessment of
individual Y2K contingency plans - 1/5/99 - 1/8/99 First draft (Rev. 1) of SERC
contingency plan - 1/11/99 - 1/12/99 Discuss Y2K drills and
update the work plan. - 1/16/99 Second draft (Rev. 2) of the SERC
contingency plan released. - 1/25/99 - 1/26/99 Presented SERC contingency
plan to NERC SCS Y2K Taskforce - 2/1/99 - 2/28/99 Review black start plans
develop draft of SERC Black Start Coordination
Procedure. - 3/1/99 Coordination of April 9 Y2K drill and
addressed operational issues (black start,
constant frequency operation, etc.).
6SERC Y2k Contingency Planning Principles
- Contingency Plans will be developed by SERC
members using the NERC Contingency Planning Guide
as a reference document - SERC Security Coordinators will facilitate
development of Control Area plans. - SERC Y2k Contingency Planning TF will aggregate
Control Area plans into the SERC Plan. - SERC members will cooperate with other regions to
accomplish coordination of Contingency Plans on
interregional and interconnection basis.
7Operating Entity Contingency Plan Development
- Each Operating Entity (OE) in SERC developed a
Y2k contingency plan - OE s include all SERC Control Areas and Operating
Entities with large loads and/or generation - Contingency Plans followed pattern of the NERC
Contingency Planning Guide
8Operating Entity Contingency Plan Assessment
Process
- The OE plan assessment included all SERC Control
Areas and Operating Entities with large loads
and/or generation. - Each plan was assessed for completeness and
quality for each step of the six step NERC Y2k
Contingency Planning Process. - Strengths and Weaknesses were identified for each
OE plan, and feedback was given.
9Operating Entity Contingency Plan Assessment
Process
- Each plan was assessed for completeness and
quality for each step of the six step NERC Y2k
Contingency Planning Process. - Identify Y2k Operating Risk
- Scenario Risk Assessment
- Develop Risk Management Strategies
- General Preparations
- Power System Operation Planning
- Implementation of Y2k System Operating Plan
- Strengths and Weaknesses were identified for each
OE plan, and feedback was given.
10SERC Operating Entity Contingency Plan
Completeness January 1999 Assessment
11SERC Operating Entity Contingency Plan Quality
January 1999 Assessment
12SERC Operating Entity Plans
- Strengths
- Risk Identification
- Risk Mitigation Strategies
- Followed the NERC Contingency Planning Guide
- Areas for Improvement
- Implementation Plans
- System Study Scope
- Restoration Coordination
- Intra- and Inter-Regional backup control center
communications
13SERC Y2k Contingency Planning Status
- All SERC Control Areas have started some level of
contingency planning - The majority of SERC Control Areas have made
strong progress into Steps 3 and 4 - All SERC Control Areas have increased their
contingency planning emphasis
14SERC Scenario Analysis
- The SERC Y2K task force identified general
scenarios to be considered by each operating
entity - The individual risk factors identified within
SERC were used as the basis for these scenarios - Each individual operating entity was then
responsible for developing appropriate and
detailed scenario analysis for their system. - Coordination and review of these individual OE
scenario analyses is being accomplished at the
SERC level.
15SERC Scenario Analysis
In general, the scenarios identified by the
operating entities within SERC fell into the
following categories
- Loss of Generation (moderate / significant)
- Loss of Transmission (partial / significant)
- Loss of Load (moderate / significant)
- Loss of Telecommunications - EMS/SCADA or voice
(partial / significant) - Combination Scenarios
- Loss of Generation, EMS/SCADA, communications
- Loss of Generation, Loss of Transmission
- System Restart
16Proactive Mitigation Strategies (Operational
Strategies)
- Generation
- Development of a unit commitment and operating
plan that will allow significant flexibility for
various scenarios. - Recommend a limited number of planned transfers
between control areas. - Minimize transaction schedule changes for
critical Y2K periods. - Man essential system facilities
- Make backup provisions for critical system data
and voice communications - Identify procedures for validity checks of
critical system data - Coordinate pumped hydro operation
17Proactive Mitigation Strategies (Operational
Strategies)
- Transmission
- Man critical facilities
- Minimize or eliminate planned facility outages
- Instigate voltage control strategies
- Review facility voltage schedules
- Verify transmission devices (capacitors,
reactors, etc.) are working properly and respond
to control. - Develop procedures to adjust generation to
support voltage. - Coordinate with Security Coordinators to reduce
the effects of parallel and/or loop flows. - Identify procedures for validity checks of
critical system data
18Proactive Mitigation Strategies (Operational
Strategies)
- Telecommunications
- Establish backup communication procedures
(control center to control center, control center
to critical facility) - Establish backup facilities for critical system
data and voice communications - Identify procedures for validity checks of
critical system data - Perform training for backup communication
procedures
19System Studies
- Minimum Load
- Voltage Control
- Islanding
- Black Start
- Underfrequency Operation
- Transfer Capability
- Load Loss
- Transmission Congestion
20System Studies
System Studies
MMWG
VST
SERC
Local
ü
ü
Minimum Load
ü
ü
ü
Voltage Control
ü
Islanding
ü
ü
Black Start
ü
ü
Underfrequency Operation
ü
ü
Transfer Capabilities
ü
ü
Loss of Load
ü
ü
Network Congestion
21Contingency Planning Discoveries
- EMS remediation/replacement efforts are critical
- Backup communication is a concern
- Current assessments continue to indicate that
operating risks are low for Y2k periods - Consideration of time zone diversity is necessary
22Spring 1999 Work Plan
23Future Activities
- Further coordinate intra-SERC contingency plans
- Improve coordination efforts with neighboring
regions - Identify operational efficiencies available by
coordinated response - Review and coordinate SERC black start plans
- April 9 Drill
24What This Means to YOU
- Technical Risks - Relatively Low but REAL
- People Risks - UNKNOWN
- Crazies/Fanatics
- Saboteurs
- Self fulfilling prophecy
- Other Risks - UNKNOWN
- Disruption of infrastructure
- Legal Liabilities
25What This Means to YOU
- Y2K Drills Duties and Responsibilities
- Man critical facilities
- Manually calculate ACE and maneuver generation
(simulation) - Manually monitor system security
- Y2K Commitment and Dispatch
- Carry extra reserves w/o bottom out
- Hydro coordination
- Least Risk Dispatch
26What This Means to YOU
- Holiday Vacation
- Dont count on it!
- Additional operators on shift
- Support staff on site
- Practice, Practice, Practice
- If you aint sick of Y2K yet, you will be!
- We MUST be ready whatever happen