Experience with the SE in Germany - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Experience with the SE in Germany

Description:

Name of Footer. 2. I.1. Statistic data on SEs in Europe. 88 SEs were established by ... Name of Footer. 6. II. Motives for establishing SEs for German companies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: am5782
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Experience with the SE in Germany


1
Experience with the SE in Germany
  • Dr. Jochem Reichert
  • September 20, 2007

2
I.1. Statistic data on SEs in Europe
  • 88 SEs were established by July 22, 2007
    (including shelf companies)
  • 85 are still in existence
  • 39 of the SEs were established in Germany (gt 40
    )

3
I.1. Statistic data on SEs in Germany
  • Number of shelf-companies in
  • Germany
  • 11 of the 39 German SEs were established as shelf
    companies
  • 2 have since been activated

4
I.3. Statistics on governance of SEs in Germany
  • Governance of German SEs
  • 11 of the 39 German SEs were established as
    one-tier SEs
  • 3 of those are shelf companies

5
I.4. German market data
  • Diverse picture of company size and industries
  • A large number of SEs were established by smaller
    enterprises
  • Famous German SE formations
  • Allianz
  • Fresenius
  • BASF
  • Porsche

6
II. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
  • Motives for the formation of SEs for German
    companies
  • Facilitation of Cross-Border-Mergers
  • The European Image
  • More flexibility in Co-Determination for big
    companies
  • Avoidance/Freezing of Co-Determination in
    Medium-Sized Enterprises
  • More flexibility in Governance the choice of the
    one-tier model
  • Uniform structure for Company Groups

7
II.1. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
  • 1. Facilitating cross-border mergers and easy
    transfer of seat
  • Facilitating cross-border mergers
  • Historical motive Enabling or facilitating a
    legally certain cross-border merger (Ex Allianz)
  • Today The transposition of the cross-border
    directive equally assures legal certainty in
    cross-border mergers
  • Easy transfer of the registered office to another
    Member State
  • German corporate law and conflict-of-law rules do
    not allow a transfer of registered office
    (dissolution and liquidation necessary) for
    corporations

8
II.2. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
  • 2. The European Image of the SE
  • The new corporation is perceived as modern and
    European (not national)
  • Importance of this motive is uncertain
  • Perception as a Merger of Equals and not as a
    takeover
  • Greater acceptance amongst employees and clients
  • Might reduce national concerns when companies
    with strategic role/long tradition merge and
    register in a foreign Member State

9
II.3. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
  • 3. Flexibility in co-determination for large
    companies
  • a. The German co-determination Co-determination
    through employee representation in the
    supervisory board. The number of
    representatives is determined as follows

500 no. of employees lt 2000
2000 employees
Co-Determination Act
One-Third-Participation Act
10
II.b. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
  • b. Co-determination in German SEs
  • SE directive on employee involvement transposed
    into the German SE Employee Involvement Act
    (SEBG)
  • More flexibility in employee involvement
  • Procedure Step 1 Formation of a special
    negotiating body 50 representatives of founders
    companies, 50 employeesStep 2 If the
    negotiations fail Application of catch-up
    provisions ? generally strictest regime of
    employee participation (German)

11
II.3. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
  • c. Evaluation of the benefits for large
    companies
  • Level of representation (percentage of
    representatives)due to German catch-up
    provisions nothing won, nothing lost
  • Possibility to find solutions tailored to
    specifics of the company
  • Extension of co-determination to representatives
    from Europe (no national blockade)
  • Reduction of the size of the supervisory
    board(ex Allianz, Fresenius, BASF)

12
II.4. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
  • 4. Avoidance and Freezing of Co-Determination for
    Medium-Sized Enterprises

German Co-Determination Law
Freezing at Third-Participation
Var. 2
Var. 1
Avoidance of co-determination
Var. 1 Establishing an SE before reaching 500
employeesVar. 2 Establishing an SE before
reaching 2000 employees
13
II.5. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
  • 5. Appeal of the One-Tier System
  • The SE opens an option between a one-tier and
    two-tier model of management
  • a. The two-tier model
  • Governance split up between a Managing Board and
    a Supervisory Board
  • Largely regulated by German Stock Corporations
    Act, but additional possibilities for structuring
    the governance.
  • Determination of majority requirements in statutes

14
II.5. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
  • b. The one-tier model

Managing Director(s)- day-to-day business-
unrestricted representative authority
externally- personal and material dependence of
administrative organ- can be member(s) of the
administrative organ (? CEO/PDG)
Managing Director(s)
Administrative Organ
Administrative Organ- management of the
company- long-term strategy
Management
General Meeting
15
II.5. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
  • c. Advantages of the one-tier model
  • For small companies and groups with many
    subsidiariespossibility of a tight management
    structure
  • capital of 3 Mio. 1 member in the
    administrative organ, 1 managing director
  • For family companies
  • Vest a head of family with extended powers of a
    CEO/PDG
  • Flexible options for retiring from active
    management

16
II.6. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
  • 6. Uniform Structures for Company Groups
  • Introduction of uniform structures in various
    different countries
  • Economic importance not clear
  • Estimation of savings in consultancy fees
  • But doubtful Still considerable differences
    between the different national SEs

17
III. Conclusion
  • Problems in Applying the Law
  • Complicated new procedures and structures always
    raise legal questions
  • Important questions that are not resolved yet
  • Is the size of the supervisory board a subject
    matter of the negotiations regarding employee
    involvement?
  • Employee involvement when establishing and
    activating shelf-companies
  • It is possible to work in practice with the legal
    regime of the SE. The large SE formations have
    been implemented as planned without any
    considerable potential for problems.

18
Thank you for your attention
  • Experiences with the SE in Germany
  • Dr. Jochem Reichert
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com