Title: Experience with the SE in Germany
1Experience with the SE in Germany
- Dr. Jochem Reichert
- September 20, 2007
2I.1. Statistic data on SEs in Europe
- 88 SEs were established by July 22, 2007
(including shelf companies) - 85 are still in existence
- 39 of the SEs were established in Germany (gt 40
)
3I.1. Statistic data on SEs in Germany
- Number of shelf-companies in
- Germany
- 11 of the 39 German SEs were established as shelf
companies - 2 have since been activated
4I.3. Statistics on governance of SEs in Germany
- Governance of German SEs
- 11 of the 39 German SEs were established as
one-tier SEs - 3 of those are shelf companies
5I.4. German market data
- Diverse picture of company size and industries
- A large number of SEs were established by smaller
enterprises - Famous German SE formations
- Allianz
- Fresenius
- BASF
- Porsche
6II. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
- Motives for the formation of SEs for German
companies - Facilitation of Cross-Border-Mergers
- The European Image
- More flexibility in Co-Determination for big
companies - Avoidance/Freezing of Co-Determination in
Medium-Sized Enterprises - More flexibility in Governance the choice of the
one-tier model - Uniform structure for Company Groups
7II.1. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
- 1. Facilitating cross-border mergers and easy
transfer of seat - Facilitating cross-border mergers
- Historical motive Enabling or facilitating a
legally certain cross-border merger (Ex Allianz)
- Today The transposition of the cross-border
directive equally assures legal certainty in
cross-border mergers - Easy transfer of the registered office to another
Member State - German corporate law and conflict-of-law rules do
not allow a transfer of registered office
(dissolution and liquidation necessary) for
corporations
8II.2. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
- 2. The European Image of the SE
- The new corporation is perceived as modern and
European (not national) - Importance of this motive is uncertain
- Perception as a Merger of Equals and not as a
takeover - Greater acceptance amongst employees and clients
- Might reduce national concerns when companies
with strategic role/long tradition merge and
register in a foreign Member State
9II.3. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
- 3. Flexibility in co-determination for large
companies - a. The German co-determination Co-determination
through employee representation in the
supervisory board. The number of
representatives is determined as follows
500 no. of employees lt 2000
2000 employees
Co-Determination Act
One-Third-Participation Act
10II.b. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
- b. Co-determination in German SEs
- SE directive on employee involvement transposed
into the German SE Employee Involvement Act
(SEBG) - More flexibility in employee involvement
- Procedure Step 1 Formation of a special
negotiating body 50 representatives of founders
companies, 50 employeesStep 2 If the
negotiations fail Application of catch-up
provisions ? generally strictest regime of
employee participation (German)
11II.3. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
- c. Evaluation of the benefits for large
companies - Level of representation (percentage of
representatives)due to German catch-up
provisions nothing won, nothing lost - Possibility to find solutions tailored to
specifics of the company - Extension of co-determination to representatives
from Europe (no national blockade) - Reduction of the size of the supervisory
board(ex Allianz, Fresenius, BASF)
12II.4. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
- 4. Avoidance and Freezing of Co-Determination for
Medium-Sized Enterprises
German Co-Determination Law
Freezing at Third-Participation
Var. 2
Var. 1
Avoidance of co-determination
Var. 1 Establishing an SE before reaching 500
employeesVar. 2 Establishing an SE before
reaching 2000 employees
13II.5. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
- 5. Appeal of the One-Tier System
- The SE opens an option between a one-tier and
two-tier model of management - a. The two-tier model
- Governance split up between a Managing Board and
a Supervisory Board - Largely regulated by German Stock Corporations
Act, but additional possibilities for structuring
the governance. - Determination of majority requirements in statutes
14II.5. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
Managing Director(s)- day-to-day business-
unrestricted representative authority
externally- personal and material dependence of
administrative organ- can be member(s) of the
administrative organ (? CEO/PDG)
Managing Director(s)
Administrative Organ
Administrative Organ- management of the
company- long-term strategy
Management
General Meeting
15II.5. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
- c. Advantages of the one-tier model
- For small companies and groups with many
subsidiariespossibility of a tight management
structure - capital of 3 Mio. 1 member in the
administrative organ, 1 managing director - For family companies
- Vest a head of family with extended powers of a
CEO/PDG - Flexible options for retiring from active
management
16II.6. Motives for establishing SEs for German
companies
- 6. Uniform Structures for Company Groups
- Introduction of uniform structures in various
different countries - Economic importance not clear
- Estimation of savings in consultancy fees
- But doubtful Still considerable differences
between the different national SEs
17III. Conclusion
- Problems in Applying the Law
- Complicated new procedures and structures always
raise legal questions - Important questions that are not resolved yet
- Is the size of the supervisory board a subject
matter of the negotiations regarding employee
involvement? - Employee involvement when establishing and
activating shelf-companies - It is possible to work in practice with the legal
regime of the SE. The large SE formations have
been implemented as planned without any
considerable potential for problems.
18Thank you for your attention
- Experiences with the SE in Germany
- Dr. Jochem Reichert