Title: Urban Environmental Governance
1Urban Environmental Governance
- Special Lecture in Environmental Biology
Environmental Research, 13.2.2006 - Arho Toikka
- Researcher, PhD Student
Department of Social Policy, Faculty of Social
Sciences
2Introduction the general problem
- Societies face a range of environmental problems
- The methods chosen to deal with issues vary over
time and between issues - How to explain environmental policy choice in
different settings? - Joas, Marko (2001). Reflexive Modernisaion of the
Environmental Administration in Finland. Turku
Ã…bo Akademi University Press. -
3Outline
- Environmental policy research in the social
sciences - Urban environmental issues and policies
- Governance
- Networked governance
- Networked governance research in urban
environmental policies
4Environmental policy research in the social
sciences
- An umbrella of different scientific disciplines
- Sociology, policy science, economics, psychology,
history - The relation between the natural environment and
the social as the object of study - The collective or the social as the level of
interest
5Environmental policy research in the social
sciences
- Three components
- The study of ideas and theories concerning
environmental policies - The study of political parties and environmental
movements - The study of collective decisions affecting the
environment (Massa 2004) - Social construction of environmental problems and
their solutions - Hajer, Maarten (1995). The Politics of
Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernization
and the Policy Process.
6Urban environmental issues and policies
- Local, regional, national, global issues all have
consequences on urban life - From global warming and biodiversity loss to
congested traffic and smoking on balconies - Local or city politics face unique environmental
pressures, but also possibilities - Between everyday life and national or
international politics - Access to both resources and local, tacit
knowledge
7Urban environmental issues and policies
- Local decision-making processes
- Less institutionalized
- Often more open
- Programmes and public planning instead of laws
and regulation - Local environmental policy instruments
- Public planning
- Legal-administrative steering
8The general problem
- Societies face a range of environmental problems
- The methods chosen to deal with issues vary over
time and between issues - How to explain environmental policy choice in
different settings? - Analyzing collective choice situations
9Governance
- A theory of collective decision-making
- Increasing level of complexity of issues and
decreasing opportunity space for public policy
have forced a move from government to governance - Governance is characterized by
- Differentiation of government
- Public and private co-operation
- Networked decision-making
- Bargaining games
10Local governance
- The local level forerunner in governance
- No tradition of a strong executive
- Local interest groups and business included
- Networks of knowledge and resources important
- Informal and formal bargaining shapes decisions
- Doing research in governance processes
- Theoretical move from traditional government
institutions to the informal co-operation
processes - Empirical focus on the networks and bargaining
games
11Social network analysis
- Focus on the relationships between social
entities - A distinct set of quantitative, mathematical or
computational, methods - Uses graphic imagery
12Social network data and methods
- Definition of
- Actor
- Relationship or tie
- Data on complete network required
- Methods include the assessment of centrality,
prominence, structural balance, cohesive
subgroups
13Networked governance
- Political decisions are made by a network of
connected, interdependent actors - Using network analysis methods and network data,
we can better understand the decision-making
processes - Governance network data requirements
- Relevant actors organizations
- Relevant ties stable negotiation links
- Data collection informant interviews at all
organizations
14Networked governance research in urban
environmental policies
- The HERC-funded project Urban and Rural Air
Pollution - Aim Explaining the differences in attitude and
action in dealing with different environmental
problems in the City of Helsinki - Research design
- Data collection and methodology
- Some preliminary results
15Research design
16Research design
Why some environmental problems become political
questions and some do not?
17Research design
What happens in the process of seeking a
solution to an environmental issue?
18Research design
How do the differences in the decision-making
process affect policy choice?
19Data collection and methodology
- The data on City of Helsinki environmental
decision-making networks - Definition of actors Organizations that actively
participate in environmental policy processes - Definition of ties Established co-operation
links on any environmental issue relevant to the
organizations - Interviews with the persons responsible for
environmental matters at the organization - About 100 organizations
- In-person interviews, 45-90min
- Data registered by interviewer on questionnaire
20Data collection and methodology
- Data input into a n x n matrix
- The analysis methods are matrix manipulations on
this matrix - Special ready-made computer programs for the
analysis, usually freely available
A
B
C
D
21Data collection and methodology
- The Helsinki Environmental Decision-Making
Network Data consist - The 100 x 100 network matrix with the ties
between actors - The preferences on selected environmental issues
for each actor - The goal To find the model that best explains
the transformation of the individual preferences
into a collective decision
22Data collection and methodology
- Modelling the decision-making process
- The base models
- City government rule
- Party politics
- Equal access
- The empirical models
- Centrality
- Brokerage
- Network exchange
23Preliminary results
- Illustration of the idea The Helsinki Ecological
Sustainability Programme draft process analysis - The environmental policy of Helsinki for
2005-2008 - Drafted in a collaboration process
- Includes 6 goals, divided into 25 subgoals and 54
concrete measures - Some measures are very ambitious and influential
- Some are either very cautious in wording and/or
lack necessary resources for realization - Why are there differences between different
arenas of environmental policy achievement?
24HEKO Network
25HEKO Network
26Conclusions
- Societies face a range of environmental problems
- The methods chosen to deal with issues vary over
time and between issues - How to explain environmental policy choice in
different settings? - The answer of governance theory
- Decisions are made by networks of actors
- The actors negotiate or bargain to find a policy
choice that - best suits everyone's preferences
- Network position defines importance
27Conclusions
28What you can do?