Title: Development of an
1Development of an HF-Radar system for the New
Jersey Shelf Observing System(NJSOS)
Josh T. Kohut Scott M. Glenn
2Standard SeaSonde
System Setup
3(No Transcript)
4SeaSonde HF Radar Sites at LEO-15
Depth
0 5 10 15 20
LEO-15 Nodes
(m)
5Standard SeaSonde
Validation
6CODAR Comparisons with REMUS ADCP
July 28, 1998
7CODAR Comparisons with REMUS ADCP
July 28, 1998
8CODAR Comparisons with REMUS ADCP
July 28, 1998
9Standard SeaSonde
Validation
10Radial Velocity Map
Brant Beach Site
Brigantine Site
Moored ADCP
25 km
A
25 cm/s
11Raw Velocity Comparison with ADCP C
July, 1998
Northern Site
RMS 7.2 cm/s
ADCP CODAR
Time (year-day)
Southern Site
RMS 9.5 cm/s
Time (year-day)
12Standard SeaSonde
Validation
13Role of Antenna Patterns in Signal Direction
Determination
14Pattern Measurement with a Transponder
15Calibration Runs
Ground Plane
Run Number
Receiver
Environment
Antenna
Date
1 2.4 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
2 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
3 2.4 m Clear A
A 10/99
4 1.2 m Clear A
A 10/99
5 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
6 1.2 m Clear B
A 09/00
7 1.2 m Clear B
B 09/00
8 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
9 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
10 1.2 m Cluttered A
B 11/00
11 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
12 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
Same as run 11 except different cable
orientation.
16Calibration Runs
Ground Plane
Run Number
Receiver
Environment
Antenna
Date
1 2.4 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
2 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
3 2.4 m Clear A
A 10/99
4 1.2 m Clear A
A 10/99
5 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
6 1.2 m Clear B
A 09/00
7 1.2 m Clear B
B 09/00
8 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
9 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
10 1.2 m Cluttered A
B 11/00
11 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
12 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
Same as run 11 except different cable
orientation.
17Ground plane
Antenna Patterns
18Receive Antenna Ground Plane
Receive Antenna Ground Plane
2.4 meter
1.2 meter
19Measured Clear Site Antenna Patterns
2.4 m Ground Plane
Loop 1 Loop 2
20Clear Site Antenna Distortions
Loop 1 Loop 2
21Cluttered Site Antenna Distortions
Loop 1 Loop 2
22Antennasand theLocal Environment
Antenna Patterns
23Calibration Runs
Ground Plane
Run Number
Receiver
Environment
Antenna
Date
1 2.4 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
2 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
3 2.4 m Clear A
A 10/99
4 1.2 m Clear A
A 10/99
5 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
6 1.2 m Clear B
A 09/00
7 1.2 m Clear B
B 09/00
8 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
9 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
10 1.2 m Cluttered A
B 11/00
11 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
12 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
Same as run 11 except different cable
orientation.
24Antenna Pattern Distortions
Antenna B
Antenna A
Loop 1 Loop 2
0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5
Clear Environment
0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5
Cluttered Environment
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
180 200 220
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
180 200 220
Angle (Degrees From True North)
25Time Dependence
Antenna Patterns
26Calibration Runs
Ground Plane
Run Number
Receiver
Environment
Antenna
Date
1 2.4 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
2 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
3 2.4 m Clear A
A 10/99
4 1.2 m Clear A
A 10/99
5 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
6 1.2 m Clear B
A 09/00
7 1.2 m Clear B
B 09/00
8 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
9 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
10 1.2 m Cluttered A
B 11/00
11 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
12 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
Same as run 11 except different cable
orientation.
27Clear Site Time Dependency
October 1999
2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
September 2000
0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0
Normalized Antenna Patterns
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
180 200 220
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
180 200 220
Angle (Degrees From True North)
Loop 1 Loop 2
28Clear Site Time Dependency
October 1999
September 2000
0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0
0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0
Normalized Antenna Patterns
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
180 200 220
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
180 200 220
Angle (Degrees From True North)
Loop 1 Loop 2
29ADCP Comparisons
30Radial Velocity Map
Brant Beach Site
Brigantine Site
Moored ADCP
25 km
A
25 cm/s
31Ideal or Measured Pattern
Loop 1 Loop 2
32ADCP and CODAR Radial Velocity Comparisons
RMS (cm/s)
R2 ()
Ground Plane
Remote Site
2.4 m Clear 12.2
60
2.4 m Clear 10.3
79
1.2 m Clear 10.1
79
1.2 m Clear 9.8
77
Ideal Patterns
Measured Patterns
33Clear Site Antenna Patterns
Loop 1 Loop 2
34ADCP and CODAR Radial Velocity Comparisons
RMS (cm/s)
R2 ()
Ground Plane
Remote Site
2.4 m Cluttered 8.2
81
2.4 m Cluttered 7.2
90
1.2 m Cluttered 8.7
86
1.2 m Cluttered 8.9
88
Ideal Patterns
Measured Patterns
35Cluttered Site Antenna Patterns
Loop 1 Loop 2
36Measuredvs.Ideal
37Radial Velocity Map
38CODAR and ADCP Radial Velocity Comparisons (2.4 m)
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Ideal Patterns Measured Patterns
A D C P
RMS Difference (cm/s)
20 40 60 80 100 120 140
160 180 200 220
39gt30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Spatial Difference Between Measured and Ideal
Patterns (2.4 m)
200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 -200
Relative Angle (Degrees)
RMS Difference (cm/s)
45 65 85 105 125 145
165 185
Reference Angle (Degrees from True North)
40gt30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Spatial Difference Between Measured and Ideal
Patterns (1.2 m)
200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 -200
Relative Angle (Degrees)
RMS Difference (cm/s)
45 65 85 105 125 145
165 185 205
Reference Angle (Degrees from True North)
41Standard SeaSonde
Contributions
- Tracking a phytoplankton bloom
42Red Tide Observed at 790 nm on 22 July 2000 With
the PHILLS Sensor
100 meters
43(No Transcript)
44Bioluminescence Potential
1e6
4e10
Photons/sec/ml
0
6
12
Depth (m)
18
24
a
0
1.0
2.0
Distance (km)
45Standard SeaSonde
Contributions
- Tracking a phytoplankton bloom
46(No Transcript)
47Towed ADCP
48(No Transcript)
49(No Transcript)
50Operation Blackmoon
1 7 13 19 25 30
Surface Velocity (cm/s)
511 7 13 19 25 30
Surface Velocity (cm/s)
52Standard SeaSonde
The Future
- Continued Real-time Operation
- Pairing with Bistatic Transmitter
- Long-range SeaSonde Validation
53Long-range SeaSonde
System Setup
- Loveladies, New Jersey (June 2000)
54Transmit Antenna
Receive Antenna
Loveladies, New Jersey
55Long-range SeaSonde
Validation
56Long-range CODAR Coverage
6 km
3 km
Day Time
4.66 MHz
Night Time
57Long-range CODAR Coverage
6 km
3 km
Day Time
4.80 MHz
Night Time
58Long-range SeaSonde
System Setup
- Loveladies, New Jersey (June 2000)
- Wildwood, New Jersey (March 2001)
59Wildwood, New Jersey
Equipment Shed
Antennas
60LORAN-A Antenna
Peaks in Transmit Antenna Gain
Antenna Height
Antenna Height
Antenna Type
Additional Power
Additional Range
1/4 ? 15.5 m CODAR
5/8 ? 38.75 m LORAN 3dB 20 km
3/4 ? 46.5 m 3dB
20 km
61(No Transcript)
62CODAR Surface Currents and Satellite SST March
20, 2001
63Long-range SeaSonde
The Future
64(No Transcript)
65Long-range SeaSonde
The Future
- 3 Additional Sites
- NorthEast Observing System (NEOS)
66NEOS
Funded Systems Proposed Systems Participating
Institutions
67(No Transcript)
68Conclusions
- The local environment plays a significant role in
pattern distortions. - System accuracy improves when the measured
pattern is used, if the pattern is not close to
ideal. - When MUSIC uses the measured pattern, velocity
vectors are more consistently put in the correct
angular bin. - Long-range SeaSonde coverage is frequency
dependent, especially at night. - Long-range HF-Radar data can be a very powerful
tool for coastal ocean observatories.
69Acknowledgements
Academics
- Dr. Scott Glenn, Dr. Bob Chant, Dr. Jeff Paduan,
- John Fracassi, Sage Lichtenwalner, Mike Crowley,
- Liz Creed and Kristie Andreson
Government
Dr. Melbourne Briscoe, CDR Cari Thomas, LCDR Gary
Thomas, LCDR Mike McAllister and Arthur Allen
Industry
Dr. Don Barrick, Belinda Lipa, Pete Lilleboe,
Laura Pederson and Bill Rector
http//marine.rutgers.edu/cool http//www.thecoolr
oom.org
70Ocean
Ground Plane Interference
Land
71(No Transcript)
72(No Transcript)
73Recievers
Antenna Patterns
74Calibration Runs
Ground Plane
Run Number
Receiver
Environment
Antenna
Date
1 2.4 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
2 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
3 2.4 m Clear A
A 10/99
4 1.2 m Clear A
A 10/99
5 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
6 1.2 m Clear B
A 09/00
7 1.2 m Clear B
B 09/00
8 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
9 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
10 1.2 m Cluttered A
B 11/00
11 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
12 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
Same as run 11 except different cable
orientation.
75Clear Site Receiver Runs
Loop 1 Loop 2
76Time Dependency
Antenna Patterns
77Calibration Runs
Ground Plane
Run Number
Receiver
Environment
Antenna
Date
1 2.4 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
2 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
3 2.4 m Clear A
A 10/99
4 1.2 m Clear A
A 10/99
5 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
6 1.2 m Clear B
A 09/00
7 1.2 m Clear B
B 09/00
8 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
9 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
10 1.2 m Cluttered A
B 11/00
11 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
12 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
Same as run 11 except different cable
orientation.
78Cluttered Site Time Dependency
October 1999
November 2000
2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0
Normalized Antenna Patterns
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
180 200 220
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
180 200 220
Angle (Degrees From True North)
Loop 1 Loop 2
79Clear Site Time Dependency
October 1999
November 2000
1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0
1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0
Normalized Antenna Patterns
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
180 200 220
40 60 80 100 120 140 160
180 200 220
Angle (Degrees From True North)
Loop 1 Loop 2
80Cables
Antenna Patterns
81Calibration Runs
Ground Plane
Run Number
Receiver
Environment
Antenna
Date
1 2.4 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
2 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 10/99
3 2.4 m Clear A
A 10/99
4 1.2 m Clear A
A 10/99
5 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
6 1.2 m Clear B
A 09/00
7 1.2 m Clear B
B 09/00
8 1.2 m Clear A
A 09/00
9 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
10 1.2 m Cluttered A
B 11/00
11 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
12 1.2 m Cluttered B
B 11/00
Same as run 11 except different cable
orientation.
82Cluttered Site Cable Runs
Loop 1 Loop 2
83Radial Velocity Map
Brant Beach Site
Brigantine Site
Moored ADCP
25 km
A
25 cm/s
84Radial Velocity Map
Brant Beach Site
Brigantine Site
Location
Moored ADCP
25 km
A
25 cm/s
85gt30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Spatial Difference Between Measured and Ideal
Patterns (2.4 m)
200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 -200
Relative Angle (Degrees)
RMS Difference (cm/s)
45 65 85 105 125 145
165 185 205
Reference Angle (Degrees from True North)
86(No Transcript)
87NEOOS HF-Radar Backbone
10 km
88Northern Site Antenna Comparisons
4 ft Measured Patterns
RMS 8.3 cm/s R2 0.84 NP 114
89Northern Site Radial Coverage
4 ft Measured Patterns
Percent Coverage
90Standard SeaSonde
Contributions
- Tracking a phytoplankton bloom
91(No Transcript)
92(No Transcript)
93Role of Antenna Patterns in Signal Direction
Determination
94Funded Installations NJ (5) and GoMOOS
(4) Long-Range CODARs
95(No Transcript)
96Tidal Velocity Comparison with ADCP C
July, 1998
Northern Site
RMS 1.6 cm/s
ADCP CODAR
Time (year-day)
Southern Site
RMS 4.3 cm/s
Time (year-day)
97First Bistatic HF-Radar Current Data
November 20, 2000
98Bistatic
Boat to Land Test
- Brant Beach, New Jersey
- February, 2001
99Bistatic Boat Test
Bistatic Transmit Antenna
Bistatic Receiver
100Bistatic Validation
Monostatic
Bistatic
1011 7 13 19 25 30
Surface Velocity (cm/s)
102Long-range SeaSonde
Validation
103Long-range Radial Field Validation
July 20, 2000 1700 GMT
104(No Transcript)
105Radial Velocity Map
Brant Beach Site
Brigantine Site
Moored ADCP
25 km
A
25 cm/s
106Raw Velocity Comparison with ADCP A
July, 1998
Northern Site
RMS 19.5 cm/s
ADCP CODAR
A
200 201 202
203 204
205 206
Time (year-day)
Southern Site
RMS 19.6 cm/s
200 201 202
203 204
205 206
Time (year-day)
107(No Transcript)
108(No Transcript)
109Bistatic
System Setup
110Backscatter HF-Radar
Bistatic HF-Radar
111Bistatic
Land to Land Test
- Monterey Bay, California
- November, 2000
Boat to Land Test
- Brant Beach, New Jersey
- February, 2001
112Bistatic
The Future
- Buoy to land
- Summer/Fall 2001
113(No Transcript)
114(No Transcript)
115(No Transcript)