GREG GIBBINS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

GREG GIBBINS

Description:

Quad axle container trailer, Level 1 PBS compliance. Tridem prime mover, Level 1 PBS compliance ... Quad axle trailer. Tridem prime mover. 5. FCL INTERSTATE ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: bitr8
Category:
Tags: gibbins | greg | axles | trailer

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GREG GIBBINS


1
National Productivity - Constrained by Process
  • GREG GIBBINS
  • General Manager - FCL Interstate Transport
    Services

2
Not a PBS Vehicle
3
FCL Champions PBS SMART Vehicles
  • Why do we need PBS SMART Vehicles?
  • To improve productivity, in some cases up to 25
  • To improve road safety, PBS compliance exceeds
    current statutory levels
  • To reduce truck trips, extra capacity reduces
    number of loads
  • To reduce greenhouse emissions, less trips less
    emissions
  • To remain competitive on a domestic and global
    scale, supply chain cost reductions
  • To align with current import / export
    productivity schemes
  • GOAL - PRODUCTIVITY SAFETY
  • Current FCL SMART Vehicles
  • 546 high cube container vehicle, Level 1 PBS
    compliance
  • Quad axle container trailer, Level 1 PBS
    compliance
  • Tridem prime mover, Level 1 PBS compliance

4
Current FCL PBS Compliant Vehicles
  • 546 container
  • Quad axle trailer
  • Tridem prime mover

5
PBS / SMART Vehicle Criteria
  • PBS process to permit
  • Transport operator determines productive vehicle
    combination
  • PBS performance report cost from 8,000 carried
    out to establish compliance
  • Complete SMART Heavy Vehicle Application
  • Independent Review Panel (IRP) will only accept
    applications upon receiving support on a case by
    case basis from CSLA (Case Study Lead Agency), ie
    State Road Authority
  • Current applications have to be submitted via the
    IRP. Any outstanding applications currently with
    State agencies now must begin process again under
    IRP
  • The IRP carries out required assessment of
    vehicle combination
  • IRP makes recommendation to State Road Authority
  • Under current arrangements, State Road
    Authorities continue to determine final approval
    of the application
  • Comments regarding process
  • No firm time-lines are given nor accountability
    for commercial outcome
  • Still no National permit allocation exist even
    after this process

6
PBS / SMART Vehicle Criteria
  • However
  • Quote A vehicle designed to operate in two or
    more States will ultimately require a permit
    application in each State (NTC website)
  • ILLOGICAL

7
Constraints with PBS
  • Case Study Lead Agency (CSLA)
  • Individual agencies (State Road Authorities) do
    not have any interest to achieve commercial
    supply chain outcomes
  • Individual departments, within individual
    agencies, often fail to communicate internally
  • Limited, if any, information fed back to the
    applicant
  • Rejections of applications often defy logic
    (example to come)
  • Even acceptance of an application by one agency
    does not give automatic acceptance in any other
    state let alone nationally
  • For PBS to be successful CSLAs need to be
    accountable for timing. They should not be
    determining a commercial outcome without
    appropriate accountability for their decision

8
Additional Constraints
  • Individual Stake Holders
  • Permit timing can also be increased via the
    following assessments with
  • Individual councils
  • Water authorities
  • Bridge departments
  • No National PBS Road Network
  • PBS network should exist that allows all
    compliant PBS vehicles access on designated
    routes, ie Level 1, 2, 3 and 4 gazetted routes
  • Individual route assessments are time consuming
    and have multiple delays
  • Each level of PBS should have adequate measures
    that allow all compliant vehicles immediate
    access to this network (set the PBS bar
    adequately high to ensure absolute compliance)

9
Logic and Compliance (should) Acceptance
  • Example of Current Shortfall in PBS in Victoria
  • Current Metro Container Vehicle Scheme exists in
    Victoria
  • These vehicles have to be Level 1 PBS compliant
    (FCL is compliant)
  • Vehicles have access to HML routes in Metro
    Melbourne upon route assessment
  • Recent application to a regional icon
    manufacturer to increase productivity by up to
    25 was denied. Reason given access already
    allowed to HML vehicles and BDoubles, FCLs
    application would set an unacceptable precedence
  • FCLs application was only for an interim period
    until rail access into the region was available
    and workable
  • FACT FCL PBS vehicle has been denied access to
    assist the productivity and competitiveness of an
    icon manufacturer in a regional environment
    because that would set an unacceptable
    precedence. No other logical reason has been
    given by the State Authority
  • Remember, this vehicle is Level 1 PBS compliant,
    is ultimately safe, provides productivity gains
    to a regional area and maintains intermodal focus
  • Question Why does State Authority not have to
    justify the rejection of PBS compliant vehicle?

10
Examples of Inconsistent PBS National Permits
11
Victoria PBS Approval
  • p Rural, Bandiana to Wygunya
  • p Metro, All HML routes (on application)
  • r Ballarat / Broadford
  • Question Why both national highways?
  • Question Why inconsistent application of PBS?

12
Tasmania PBS Approval
  • p zero
  • r Smithtown to Mainland via Devonport
  • Economic value domestic produce to Sydney
  • Cost to Australia NZ export chips direct to NSW
  • Question Why disadvantage domestic production
    and advantage foreign producers?
  • Refer next slide

13
Tasmania
  • Conditions on exemption of vehicles carrying
    overseas export freight containers
  • the combination must be a tandem drive prime
    mover with a single tri-axle trailer
  • all the axles of the combination except for the
    steer axle of the truck must be equipped with
    road-friendly suspension
  • all axle groups, other than the steer axle, must
    be fitted with dual tyres
  • the freight container must contain perishable
    commodities being transported for the purpose of
    export overseas
  • each freight container must be accompanied by
    documentation specifying
  • the origin and destination of the container
  • the nature of the commodity in the container
  • the container identification number
  • the combination must not exceed the mass
    limits FCL PBS Quad
  • Steer axle 6.0 tonnes limit 6.0 tonnes
  • Tandem axle 18.5 tonnes limit 17.0 tonnes
  • Triaxle trailer 22.5 tonnes limit 27.0 tonnes
    (7.5 tonnes per axle) (6.75 tonnes per axle)
  • Aggregate axle mass 47.0 tonnes limit 50.0
    tonnes
  • the person to whom the exemption applies must be
    a member of an approved mass-management scheme

14
Queensland
  • Quad axle
  • p BDouble routes by application (Note 19m
    long!)
  • r Vehicle 19m, why only use on BDouble?
  • Question Require IAP which has not been formally
    determined (cost 13,000 per vehicle)
  • Queensland Inconsistency
  • MEMS
  • 10 more weight per axle group, but must not
    exceed 46 tonnes
  • Question Why disadvantage domestic?

15
NSW
  • p zero PBS
  • r 546 Regional
  • r Quad axle Metro
  • r Tridem
  • Question Disadvantage new manufacturers /
    producers for domestic and export?
  • Globally accepted product eg, beef, can not get
    to the wharf cost effectively to be shipped into
    cities such as Philadelphia which have recently
    allowed an increase in GCM (gross combination
    mass) of 49.5 tonne specifically for imported
    Australian beef
  • FCL PBS Quad
  • 6.0 tonnes
  • 17.0 tonnes
  • 27.0 tonnes (6.75 tonnes per axle)
  • 50.0 tonnes

16
Key Points and Solutions
  • PBS not recognised nationally at a regulators
    level
  • Solution IRP should have authority to assess and
    determine outcome
  • PBS inconsistent recognition within states
  • Solution IRP should have authority to deliver
    one permit for national recognition
  • PBS highly inefficient at regulator level
  • Solution Leave the assessment and outcome at IRP
    level
  • PBS still requires individual route assessment
  • Solution Assess and determine routes for a
    national roll-out

17
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com