Energy Efficient Network Protocols for Wireless Networks

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Energy Efficient Network Protocols for Wireless Networks

Description:

Variable Clock Speed CPU's, flash memory, disk spin down. ... Probing Protocol that slows data transmission when degraded channel conditions are encountered. ... –

Number of Views:219
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: terikuy
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Energy Efficient Network Protocols for Wireless Networks


1
Energy Efficient Network Protocols for Wireless
Networks
  • Kiran Muthabatulla

2
Introduction
  • Wireless Networking exploding in Mobile and
    personal communications
  • Cell Phones, Personal Computing Systems, Wireless
    LAN's
  • As a result
  • Energy Efficiency is an important design
    consideration due to limited battery life of
    Mobile terminals.

3
Introduction
  • Network Interface significant consumer of
    power.
  • Power consumption On an Average system CPU-21,
    36 LCD. 18 Wireless Interface 18 Hard Disk,
    Power consumption.
  • Hence..
  • Low Power design of the Entire Network Stack is
    needed to enhance energy efficiency.

4
Infrastructure Network
5
Base Stations in BSS Mode
  • Coordinate Access to one or more transmission
    channels for mobiles within the coverage cell.
  • Wireless Access to and from the wired host occurs
    in the last hop between base stations and mobile
    hosts that share the bandwidth of the wireless
    channel.

6
Ad hoc Network
7
Ad-Hoc
  • Multi Hop wireless Networks, in which a set of
    mobiles cooperatively maintain network
    connectivity.
  • On-demand network, dynamic unpredictable, random,
    multi hop topologies which has no infrastructure
    support.
  • Mobiles must periodically update topology
    information for routing.

8
Protocol Stack
9
Responsibilities Data Link
  • Data Link reliable and secure Logical Layer over
    unreliable Wireless Link.
  • Security Encryption and Decryption
  • Network layer packet conversion into frames
  • Packet re-transmissions.
  • MAC Allocates the time-frequency or code space
    modulations among mobiles sharing wireless
    channels in a region.

10
Low Power at PHY Layer
  • Increase Battery capacity
  • Slow progress. Developments in Battery technology
    is very slow
  • Decrease amount of energy consumed at the
    Wireless terminal.
  • Hardware means
  • Variable Clock Speed CPUs, flash memory, disk
    spin down.

11
Sources of Power Consumption
  • Communication related.
  • Transceiver at the source, intermediate and
    destination nodes.
  • Transmitter is used for sending control, route
    request and response, as well as data packets
    originating at the sender.
  • Receiver is used to receive data and control
    packets destined for the node.
  • Computation related Usage of CPU, Main Memory,
    disk, data compression techniques.

12
Mobile Radio Power Modes
  • Proxim Range LAN2 2.4 GHz
  • Transmit
  • 1.5 W in transmit
  • Receive
  • 0.75 W in receive
  • Standby
  • 0.01W in Standby

13
General Guidelines
  • Collisions must be eliminated as they result in
    re-transmissions.
  • Re-transmissions lead to unnecessary power
    consumption and to possibly unbounded delays.
  • Broadcast environment, receiver remains on at all
    times.
  • Node Receives the packets and forwards only if it
    is meant to the receiving node.
  • Channel status monitoring.

14
Scheduling
  • Broadcast scheduling that contains the data
    transmission starting times for each mobile.
  • This enables the mobiles to switch to a standby
    mode until the receive start time.
  • Turn off the transceiver whenever the node
    determines that it will not be receiving data for
    a period of time.

15
Scheduling..
  • Mobile Radio Switching between TX and RX.
  • A protocol that allocates permissions on a slot
    by slot basis suffers substantial over head.
  • Mobile should be allocated contiguous slots for
    TX or Rx to reduce turnaround.
  • Mobiles may request multiple transmission slots
    with a single reservation packet.

16
Scheduling..
  • Mobiles transmit data transmission requests to
    the BS. The BS computes the system transmission
    schedule and broadcasts each mobiles transmission
    schedule.
  • Mobiles Wake up when its their schedule time.
  • Considerations
  • Battery power at stations
  • QOS
  • Avoid TX when channel conditions are poor.

17
General Guidelines
  • Load Balancing of the Battery Power
  • Avoid routing through nodes with lower battery
    power.
  • May want not to update routing information but
    may suffer performance.
  • Taking advantage of Broadcast Multicast packets.

18
MAC Sub Layer
  • IEEE 802.11 Standard.
  • CSMA/CA
  • Back off timers/Slots
  • Positive ACKs
  • RTS/CTS.
  • PSP, NULL Data Frame.
  • Base Stations Store the Packets
  • Beacon updates

19
EC-MAC
  • Based on Reservation and Scheduling
  • Transmission organized by the BS into Frames, and
    each slot equals the basic unit of Wireless data
    transmission.
  • At the Start of Each Frame, The BS transmits the
    FSM which contains sync info and the uplink
    transmission order for the subsequent information
    and the uplink information order for the
    subsequent reservation phase.

20
EC-MAC
21
PAMAS Protocol
  • Power Aware Multiple Access
  • For Ad hoc Networks.
  • Separate Channels for RTS/CTS and data packets.
  • Mobile sends RTS, Waits CTS, if received, the
    mobile sends over Data Channel.
  • Sets the Control Channel to busy.

22
PAMAS Protocol
  • Mobiles not receiving and sending packets turn
    off the wireless interface.
  • Data transmissions need not be overheard by all
    the neighbors of the transmitter.
  • Separate control channel determines when and how
    long to power off.
  • Mobile should power itself off
  • No packets to TX and neighbor begins to send
    packet not for it.
  • Has packets to send, but some other pair already
    started to communicate.
  • Probe protocol to see how long to sleep.

23
LLC Error Control.
  • Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ)
  • A type of communications link where the receiver
    asks the transmitter to re-send a block of data
    when errors are detected
  • Forward Error Correction (FEC)
  • A method of error control where the receiving
    node automatically corrects as many channel
    errors as it can without referring to the sending
    node.

24
Disadvantages
  • Both of them waste network bandwidth and consume
    power resources due to retransmissions of data
    packets
  • Greater overhead necessary in error correction.

25
Adaptive Error Control With ARQ.
  • New Design Metric Energy efficiency of a
    protocol which is defined as the ratio between
    total amount of data delivered and total amount
    of energy consumed.
  • If more data is transmitted for a given amount of
    energy consumption, the energy efficiency
    increases.

26
Guidelines
  • Avoid Persistence in Retransmitting Data.
  • Trade off number of re-transmission attempts for
    probability of successful transmission
  • Inhibit transmissions when channel conditions are
    poor.

27
Guidelines..
  • Probing Protocol that slows data transmission
    when degraded channel conditions are encountered.
  • ARQ works normal until the Transmitter detects an
    error in either the data or control channel due
    to lack of an ACK.
  • At this time, the protocol enters a probing mode,
    in which the probing packet is transmitted every
    t-slots.
  • This mode is continued until ACKs start to show
    up.
  • Then protocol returns to normal mode.

28
Other Schemes proposed.
  • Adaptive Error control with ARQ/FEC combination
  • Adaptive Power control and coding scheme

29
Network Layer
  • Routing Packets
  • Mobiles cooperate to maintain Topology
    information
  • Use Multi hop packet routing
  • Usual Approaches
  • Frequent topology results in improved routing
  • Infrequent topology results in decreased update
    messages.
  • Congestion Control

30
Network Layer
  • Typical Metrics
  • Shortest Hop
  • Shortest Delay
  • Locality stability

31
(No Transcript)
32
Unicast Traffic Metrics
  • Energy Consumed per packet Min
  • Time to network Partition Max
  • Critical Nodes drain their power at equal rates.
  • Variance in power levels across mobiles Min
  • All nodes are at the same priority level
  • All mobiles are equal and no one mobile is
    penalized or privileged over the other.
  • Cost per packet Min
  • Routes with depleted energy reserves dont lie in
    many routes.
  • Maximum Mobile cost Min
  • Minimize cost to move the packet through this
    node.

33
Broadcast Traffic
  • Single transmission, a mobile is able to
    broadcast a packet to all immediate neighbors.
  • Intermediate Nodes re-transmit the packet to all
    its immediate.
  • Turn off after receiving the packet if the
    neighbor already received the packet.

34
Broadcast Traffic
  • Traditional Flooding
  • No Global topology information requiring little
    control overhead and completes the broadcast with
    minimum number of hops.
  • Solution
  • Collect topology information.
  • Ensure that transmission reaches as many new
    nodes as possible.
  • Construct trees with lowest cost per outgoing
    degree.

35
Transport Layer
  • TCP degrades over Wireless Link
  • Large number of Re-transmissions
  • Frequently invoke congestion control measures.
  • Confusing Wireless Link Errors
  • Loss due to handoff as channel congestion.
  • Significantly reduces throughput and introduce
    unacceptable delays.

36
New Schemes
  • TO reduce Retransmissions
  • Split connection protocols
  • Hide the wireless link from the wired network by
    terminating the Tcp connection at the Base
    station.
  • Link Layer protocols
  • Hide link related Losses from the TCP source by
    using a combination of local retransmissions and
    FEC.
  • End to End Protocols.
  • Modified versions of TCP sensitive to Wireless
    environment

37
Split Connection
38
Link Layer Protocols
39
References
  • This presentation is a understanding based on the
    research paper.
  • A survey of energy efficient network protocols
    for wireless networks. Wireless Networks,
    7(4)343--358, July 2001. by C. E. Jones, K. M.
    Sivalingam, P. Agrawal, and J. C. Chen.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com