Title: Massive Black Hole Growth and Formation
1- Massive Black Hole Growth and Formation
- P.Coppi, Yale
- The Problem --
- Observational Constraints
- Clues
- Solutions?
- Pop. III Seeds
- Insights From Present-Day
- Star Formation
- Gas-Rich Mergers
- 3. Future Prospects Questions
Fan et al. 2003
2HST QSO hosts
Bahcall et al. 2000
3Timescale Problem
Need to pack a lot of gas into small region FAST!
4Soltan 1982-type argument/problem
5Observational Debates Clues Rare
long-lived AGN vs. many short-lived AGN?
Seems to be tilting decisively towards
6IR Detection of AGN?
?
Cutri et al. 2001 Smith et al. 2001
Ready for SIRTF!
7Where are the SMBH binaries?
3C 75 Merger Starting?
Owen, VLA
8Smoking Gun?
NGC 326
Ekers Merrit, 2002
9 From the Dark Ages to the Cosmic Renaissance
- First Stars Transition from Simplicity to
Complexity
10 Region of Primordial Star Formation
- Gravitational Evolution of DM
- Gas Microphysic
- - Can gas sufficiently cool?
- - tcool lt tff (Rees-Ostriker)
-
-
- Collapse of First Luminous Objects expected
- at zcoll 20 30
- with total mass M 106 Mo
11How massive were the First Stars?
M 106 Mo
normal IMF
Top-heavy IMF
Cluster of Stars
Massive Black Hole
Previous estimates 1 Mo lt MPopIII lt 106 Mo
12The Physics of Population III
- Simplified physics
- No magnetic fields yet (?)
- No metals no dust
- Initial conditions given by CDM
- Well-posed problem
- Problem
- How to cool primordial gas?
- No metals different cooling
- Below 104 K, main coolant is H2
- H2 chemistry
- Cooling sensitive to H2 abundance
- H2 formed in non-equilibrium
- Have to solve coupled set of rate
equations
Metals
Atomic cooling
H_2 cooling
Tvir for Pop III
13Simulating the Formation of the First Stars
(Bromm, Coppi, Larson and Bromm Hernquist)
- Use TREESPH / Gadget (both DM and gas)
- Radiative cooling of primordial gas
- Non-equilibrium chemistry
- Initial conditions ?CDM
- Modifications to SPH
- - sink particles
- - particle splitting
14Cosmological Initial Conditions
- Consider situation at z 20
Gas density
Primordial Object
7 kpc
15The First Star-Forming Region
M 106 Mo
1 kpc
7 kpc
16Formation of a Population III Star
Mhalo 106 Mo
Mclump 103 Mo
25 pc
1 kpc
(see also Bromm, Coppi, Larson 1999, 2002)
17A Physical Explanation
- Gravitational instability (Jeans 1902)
- Jeans mass
- MJT1.5 n-0.5
- Thermodynamics of primordial gas
T vs. n
MJ vs. n
- Two characteristic numbers in
- microphysics of H2 cooling
- - Tmin 200 K
- - ncrit 103 - 104 cm-3 (NLTE LTE)
- Corresponding Jeans mass MJ 103 Mo
18A Tale of Two Timescales
- Consider the cooling and freefall times
Timescale vs. n
tff tcool
- Gas particles loiter at n 103 104 cm-3
- - tcool tff
- - Quasi-hydrostatic phase
- Runaway collapse occurs
- - s.t. tcool tff
19The Crucial Role of Accretion
- Final mass depends on accretion from dust-free
- Envelope
- Development of core-envelope structure
- - Omukai Nishi 1998 , Ripamonti et al.
2002 - Mcore 10-3 Mo very similar to Pop. I
- Accretion onto core very different!
- dM/dtacc MJ / tff T3/2 (Pop I T 10 K, Pop
III T 300 K) - Can the accretion be shut off in the absence of
dust? -
20Protostellar Collapse (Bromm Loeb 2003,
astro-ph/0301406)
- Simulate further fate of the clump
25 pc
0.5 pc
21The Crucial Role of Accretion
M vs. time
dM/dt vs. time
22The Death of the First Stars
(Heger et al. 2002)
Pop I
Z
PISN
Pop III
Initial Stellar Mass
23The First Supernova Explosions
(with N. Yoshida L. Hernquist)
M 106 Mo
1 kpc
7 kpc
24HII Regions around the First Stars
1 kpc
25The First Supernova-Explosion
Gas density
- Complete
- Disruption
- (PISN)
1 kpc
26Paradise Lost The Transition to Population II
(Bromm, Ferrara, Coppi,
Larson 2001, MNRAS, 328, 969)
- Add trace amount of metals
- Limiting case of no H2
- Heating by photoelectric
- effect on dust grains
Cooling Rate vs. T
Consider two identical (other than Z) simulations
!
27Effect of Metallicity
Z 10-4 Zo
Z 10-3 Zo
Critical metallicity Zcrit 5 x 10-4 Zo
28 En Route to a Supermassive Black Hole?
- Consider gas distribution in central 100 pc
Low-spin
High-spin
Single object M 106 Mo
Binary M1,2 106 M0
29Tsuribe 2000
30Simulation of idealized gas-rich merger A. Escala
Dynamical friction phase
31Binary-dominated (self-similar?) phase
32Fast merger?
33Summary (questions) Merger vs. accretion? Both?
? Primordial (Pop. III) seeds plausible, very
high z mini-AGN/mergers/GRBs? Where are the
binaries? (maybe binaries dont accrete
efficiently?) Where are the IMBH? Do intense
radiation fields lead to top-heavy IMFs? More
interesting observations to come better
X-ray follow-ups, SIRTF, LISA Theorists hard at
work to catch up (feedback is the main problem)
34The First Supernova-Explosion
Metal Distribution
1 kpc
35Thermodynamics and Structure
Phase Distribution
T vs. log n
36Dense-shell Formation
Timescale vs Radius
Inverse Compton cooling
tff
tshock
tcool
37The First Supernova-Explosion
Gas density
1 kpc
- Complete
- Disruption
- (PISN)
38Nucleosynthetic Evidence (Qian Wasserburg
2002)
Heavy r-process abund. vs. Fe/H
- Signature of VMS enrichment at Fe/H lt -3
- Normal (Type II) SNe at higher Fe/H
-
Zcrit
39Cosmic Star Formation History (Mackey, Bromm
Hernquist 2003)
Comoving SFR vs. redshift
- 2 modes of SF
- - Pop III VMS
- - Pop I / II normal stars
- Pop III SF possible
- in halos with
- - Tvir lt 104 K molecular cooling
- - Tvir gt 104 K atomic H cooling
-
Pop III
Pop I / II
(Springel Hernquist 2003)
40Cosmic Star Formation History (Mackey, Bromm
Hernquist 2003)
Comoving SFR vs. redshift
- Dominant Pop III SF
- expected in halos with
- Tvir gt 104K atomic H cooling
- Strong negative feedback
- suppresses SF in mini-halos
- (radiative and mechanical)
-
-
Pop III
41The Pop III Pop II Transition
(Mackey, Bromm Hernquist 2003)
Metallicity SFR vs. redshift
Zcrit
50
5
ztran 15 - 20
42Relic of the Dawn of Time
- HE0107-5240 Fe/H - 5.3 (Christlieb et al.
2002)
- What does this star tell us about Population III
?
43Metal Poor Halo Stars and the First Stars (with
Schneider, Ferrara, Salvaterra, Omukai 2003,
Nature in press)
- Abundance pattern
- - core-collapse SN
- - PISN
- Break degeneracy
- - r-process elements
- Z lt Zcrit ?
- - role of dust
- - shock-compression
- - statistics
44 Formation of the First Quasars (Bromm Loeb
2003, astro-ph/0212400)
- Seed BH by direct collapse of primordial gas
cloud
(Loeb Rasio 1994, ApJ, 432, 52)
Stars Gas
- Problem
- - Gas cooling
- - Fragmentation
- - Star Formation
- - Negative Feedback (SNe)
- No compact central object!
Mass 109 Mo, R 1 kpc zvir 5, no DM
45 First Dwarf Galaxies as Sites of BH Formation
T vs. log n
- 2 sigma peak
- M 108 M0, zvir 10
- Tvir 104 K
- Cooling possible due to
- atomic H
- Photo-dissociation of H2 H2 h nu
2 H - Lyman Werner photons h nu
11.2 13.6 eV
Tvir 104 K
46Gamma-Ray Bursts as Probes of the First Stars
- GRB progenitors massive stars
- GRBs expected to trace cosmic SFH
- Swift mission
- - Launch in 2003
- - Sensitivity
- GRBs from z gt 15
47Expected Redshift Distribution of GRBs
( Bromm Loeb 2002, ApJ, 575, 111 )
SF History
GRB Redshift Distribution
(Cf. Barkana Loeb 2000, ApJ, 539, 20)
- Fraction of all burst from z gt 5 50
- Fraction of GRBs detected by Swift from z gt 5
25
48Summary
- Primordial gas typically attains
- - T 200 300 K
- - n 103 104 cm-3
- Corresponding Jeans mass MJ 10 3 Mo
- Pop III SF might have favored very massive
stars - Transition to Pop II driven by presence of
metals - (ztrans 15 20)
- PISNe completely disrupt mini-halos and enriches
surroundings - Metal-poor halo stars as probes of the first
stars
49Perspectives
Further fate of clumps - Feedback of
protostar on its envelope - Inclusion of
opacity effects (radiative transfer) The
Second Generation of Stars SN feedback and
metal enrichment from the first stars How does
a VMO evolve and die? Observability (lensing?)
and statistics of high-z SNe
50132 node Beowulf cluster (AMD Athlon)
51The Mass of a Population III Star
- Central core in free-fall M 100 Mo
- Extended envelope with isothermal density
profile - First stars were predominantly very
massive
52Implications of a Heavy IMF For the First Stars
(Bromm, Kudritzki, Loeb 2001, ApJ,
552, 464)
- Consider 100 Mo lt M lt 1000 Mo (VMO)
- Structure determined by
- - Radiation pressure, Luminosity close to
EDDINGTON limit
log L vs. log Teff
- For Pop III
- Teff 110,000 K
- lambda peak 250 A
- (close to He II ionization edge)
53How Do VMOs Evolve ?
log L vs. log Teff
- Nuclear burning up
- He ignition
- Estimated lifetime
- 3 x 106 yr
- Crucial uncertainty
- Mass loss ???
54Spectral Signature
- Strong NLTE effects
- Close to black-body form
- Lines of H I and He II
Flux vs. Wavelength
55A Generic Spectrum
L nu / M vs. lambda
- Spectra very similar for M gt 300 Mo
- Predict composite spectrum
- almost independent of IMF
- Ionizing photon production
- Rare 3 sigma peaks may suffice to reionize the
Universe
56Probing the Primordial IMF with NGST
- Observed spectrum Heavy IMF vs. Salpeter IMF
Observed flux vs. Wavelength
- Salpeter case from Tumlinson Shull 2000
- Observed spectrum from cluster with heavy IMF is
significantly bluer
57Why Study Population III?
- The Quest for our Origins
- Importance for Cosmological Structure Formation
- Reheat / Reionize the Universe
- Feedback effects on IGM
- Initial enrichment with metals
- Pure H/He out of BBNS
- Need stars to synthesize heavy
elements - Pop III remnants
- Baryonic DM (?)
- Upcoming Observations
- CMB anisotropy probes (WMAP / Planck)
- Study imprint of first stars
- IR missions (SIRTF/ JWST)
- Direct imaging