Title: Epidemiological Study Designs
1Epidemiological Study Designs
2Epidemiological Study Designs
- C
- Ecological Studies
- C
- Case Control
- C
- Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs)
3Observational Study Designs
- Descriptive Studies
- Analytic Studies
4Experimental Study Designs
- Randomized clinical trials
- Community-based interventions/trials
5Case Series
- Describes the experience of a single patient or
group of patients with a similar diagnosis. - Describes the problem based on person, place, and
time factors.
6Ecologic Studies
- Used to determine an association between two
variables by comparing groups. - Exposure and outcome measures based on group
data. - Groups are formed based on a variable that is not
being studied. (i.e. geographic location)
7Cross Sectional Studies
- Researcher assesses exposure and disease at the
same time. - Exposure and outcome are based on individuals.
8Cross Sectional Study
Exposure Status Disease Status
Delinquent Fought
Delinquent, Did not Fight
Sample of High School Students
Prior delinquency (exposure) fighting
(disease/outcome)
Not Delinquent, Fought
Not Delinquent, Did not Fight
9Case Control Study
- Participants are selected on the basis of disease
status. - Are compared based on past exposures.
10Case Control Study
Time
1970
Present
1970
Exposure
Disease
No Exposure -
Exposure
No Disease -
No Exposure -
11Case Control Study
- Exposures are obtained retrospectively.
- Cases
- Cases
12Selection of Cases
- I
- typically preferable to use
- more difficult to find cases
- P
- exposures may be related to duration of illness
instead of development of the illness. - the exposure status of prevalent cases will
differ from that of all cases.
13Case Selection
- Hospital Cases
- Disease registries
- Occupation based
14Example of Case Selection
- You want to determine the antecedents to teen
fatherhood. Who are your cases?
15Example of Case Selection
- You want to determine incidence cases in a study
assessing the effectiveness of bike helmets in
preventing head injuries. Who are your cases?
16Control Selection
- Do not have to be representative of the general
population. - Ideally, chosen at random from the referent
population. - Should have or have had the same opportunity to
become cases.
17Sources of Controls
- Population controls - random digit dialing
- H
- N
- F
- M
18Matching
- Characteristics used for matching
19- Matching on too many variables makes control
selection difficult. - Cannot study the characteristics upon which you
match. - Unplanned matching-neighborhood controls are
inadvertently matched with cases on SES. - Overmatching-occurs when variables related to the
disease are inadvertently matched upon.
20Selection of Controls
- You want to determine the antecedents to teen
fatherhood. - Who are your controls?
- What variables do you match?
21Cohort Studies
- Looks to determine the effects of a particular
exposure. - All participants are free of disease at the
outset.
22Types of Cohort Studies
- C
- prospective cohort
- longitudinal
- N
- retrospective cohort
- historical cohort
23Concurrent Cohort Study
Time
Present
2025
physically active
Cancer
No Cancer
Defined Population
Cancer
not physically active
No Cancer
24Nonconcurrent Cohort Study
Time
1985
2005
physically active
Cancer
No Cancer
Defined Population
Cancer
not physically active
No Cancer
25Selection of Exposed Group
- Select a random sample of the population, survey
to determine exposure, then stratify into
exposed/unexposed groups.
26Selection of Unexposed Group
- Groups should be as similar as possible, with the
exception of the exposure in question. - Internal comparison -
- External comparison -
27Exposure Assessment
- Exposure must be clearly defined and measurable.
- Some exposures may be acute and some may be
long-term.
28Outcome Assessment
- Participants cannot have the disease in question
at the start of the study. - Measurement of outcome status
29Cohort Example
- The association of drinking water source and
chlorination by-products with cancer incidence
among postmenopausal women in Iowa. - How do you assess exposure?
- How do you assess outcome?
30Exposure Assessment - Example
31Outcome Assessment Example
32Advantages of Cohort Studies
- Provide a direct estimate of risk (relative risk)
- Establish temporal trends
- Strongest observational design for establishing
cause and effect relationships.
33Disadvantages of Cohort Studies
- Requires large sample size
- Not good for studying rare diseases
- Changes over time of diagnostic tests may bias
results.
34Comparison of Cohort Studies
35Nested Case Control
- Combination of a cohort and case control study.
- Utilizing a cohort study
36Experimental Studies
- Community intervention trials
- Clinical trials
37Experimental Studies
- Characteristics
- p
- c
- intervention is provided drug, treatment,
education - researcher assigns participants to treatment
groups - b
38Randomized Clinical Trial
restenosis
stent rapamycin group
no restenosis
Sample of Patients with CAD
Randomized into new tx and old tx groups
restenosis
stent w/o rapamycin group
no restenosis
39Randomization
- Each participant has equal probability of
assignment to intervention or control group. - Increases the chances that the two groups will be
comparable in terms of known and unknown
variables that affect prognosis.
40Advantages of RCTs
- M
- Balances prognostic indicators across study
groups - D
- Assumptions of statistical tests are typically
met. - R
41Disadvantages of RCTs
- E
- Subject exclusions may limit generalizability
- T
- Ethical concerns--who gets treatment, who does
not - Noncompliance by study participants
- C
42RCT Example
- Study Question
- Assess the effectiveness of a violence prevention
curriculum among children in elementary schools
in Seattle, Washington - How do you select your subjects? Control group?
- How do you randomize?
- What are your end points (outcomes)?
43Subject Selection
44How to Randomize
45End Points?