The relative timing of RHESSI and radio Phoenix2 fine structures

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

The relative timing of RHESSI and radio Phoenix2 fine structures

Description:

The relative timing of RHESSI and radio (Phoenix-2) fine structures ... Error bars: perturb solution until log L drops by unity. A problem case. Attenuator in ... –

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: lif87
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The relative timing of RHESSI and radio Phoenix2 fine structures


1
The relative timing of RHESSI and radio
(Phoenix-2) fine structures
  • Kaspar Arzner and Arnold Benz,
  • PSI / ETHZ
  • RHESSI Demodulation Method
  • Benchmarking
  • HXR-Radio comparison procedure
  • Results

4th RHESSI Workshop, Meudon, July 26-28 2004
2
Motivation
  • Physical emission mechanisms supposedly known
    HXR by Bremsstrahlung type III from electron
    beams -gt Langmuir waves -gt electromagnetic waves
    etc.
  • But same electrons?
  • But geometry? Radio propagation delay or
    electron time-of-flight delay? Center-to-limb
    variation?
  • Earlier observations have reported HXR
    finestructures down to some 50ms, and different
    HXR/radio timings.
  • Is there a canonical flare at all?
  • What can RHESSI contribute? Good time resolution,
    but on time scales lt 2s, RHESSI must be
    demodulated before comparison with spatially
    non-resolved radio data from the Phoenix-2
    instrument.

3
______________Visibility-based RHESSI
DemodulatPrinciple (1)
4
__________Visibility-based RHESSI Demodulation,
Principle (2)
5
__________Visibility-based RHESSI Demodulation,
Principle (3)
Poisson likelihood
A priori probability Pa
6
Technicalities
__________________Visibility-based RHESSI
Demodulation (4)
  • Time bins Dt are integer fractions of the spin
    period
  • Explicitly, log L S-litcit(1lnlit/cit)
  • log Ptot log L - log Pa is iteratively
    maximized (Newton-Marquardt)
  • Typically 104 fit parameters
  • Connection between regularisation parameters ak
    and smoothness of solution rk,t
  • tk max(Dt, (ak)1/2 ltcgt/lta0Lgt )

Counts livetime (0ltLlt1)
7
Benchmarking (1)
_____________________________________
Benchmarking (1)
8
Details
_____________________________________
Benchmarking (2)
  • bp hsi_bproj(), set time_range, image_dim,
    xyoffset,pixel_size, cbe_powers_of_two0,
    use_auto_time_bin0, time_bin_min, time_bin_def
  • vr 0,0,....0,1,0,...,0
  • HSI_MODUL_PATTERN hsi_annsec2xy(bp -gt
    getdata(vratevr, this_det5))
  • a0 gridtranrel_det_eff
  • a1 gridtranrel_det_effmodampl
  • MANUAL MODUL PATTERN (x,y) a0
    a1cos(kx(x-Px)ky(y-Py)phi)
  • im hsi_image(), set as above
  • map fltarr(image_dim)
  • mapi,j 1
  • HSI_MODUL_PROFILE im_ob -gt getdata(classhsi_mo
    dul_profile, vimagehsi_xy2annsec(map,im),
    this_det_index5)
  • MANUAL MODUL PROFILE (t) a0(t)
    a1(t)cos(kx(t)(xs-Px(t))ky(t)(ys-Py(t))phi(t)
    )

9
Running the Code ...
10
Convergence
_____________________________________
Benchmarking (3)
total prob.
Agreement with observation (likelihood)
A priori prob. (smoothness)
Data from 15-Apr-02 085110 085150
11
Simulations
_____________________________________
Benchmarking (4)
true
Demod 1-9 Avg 1-3 and t 0.1s
Similar to c) but includes data gaps
Demod 7-9 Avg 7-9 and t 0.25s
12
_____________________________ Demodulation
Examples (1)
1.2 ct / Dt background found
Dt 0.013 s
13
_____________________________ Demodulation
Examples (2)
Predicted vs observed counts
Visibilities
14
____________________________ Demodulation
Examples (3)
Counts should reflect a0
Check DF ltlt 2p
15
_________________________ Demodulation
Benchmarking (5)
Visibility-based demodulation using different
subsets of subcollimators
Gordon Hurfords demodulator_test
Time bin RHESSI spin period
16
_________________________ Demodulation
Benchmarking (6)
17
_________________________ Demodulation
Benchmarking (7)
18
_________________________ Demodulation
Benchmarking (8)
19
Phoenix-2 Spectrometer
  • f 112 ... 3980 MHz
  • Df 1,3,10 MHz
  • t 440 ms (1 freq channel)
  • 100 ms (1 freq sweep)
  • Tsys 1200 ... 2100 K
  • HPBW full-sun
  • R/L polarization only intensity used for HXR
    correlation
  • Bleien, Switzerland
  • (-80644 E, 4702029 N )

20
basic calibration
3. Select time -frequency box from Phoenix-2
spectrogram. Include Type III onset at high
frequencies.
Dots raw counts
1. Choose RHESSI energy band and time range
2. Generate demodulation
SC1, Dt0.2s
Here a slow and a fast component
21
Cross-Correlation
22
_________________________________________ Results
(1)
INTENSITY
Normal-drifting type III
23
_________________________________________ Results
(2)
Reversed-drifting type III
24
_________________________________________ Results
(3)
dm type III (harmonic, fundamental more delayed)
25
_________________________________________ Results
(4)
26
_________________________________________ Results
(5)
Normal-drifting type III
Synchrotron
27
_________________________________________ Results
(6)
(same event, later time)
28
_________________________________________ Results
(7)
29
_________________________________________ Results
(8)
However, ...
General agreement between HXR maximum and
synchrotron (?) patch, but there are clearly
HXR peaks without any radio association.
30
Summary
Radio is typically delayed by 0.2 0.6 seconds
(compatible with results from Markus Aschwanden
et al 1995?)
31
Discussion
  • Only few (lt20) flares show correlating HXR/radio
    finestructures
  • Best between type III onset and HXR
  • Achievable RHESSI resolution 100 ms, depends on
    count rate.
  • Uncertainties of the RHESSI demodulation are
    usually dominated by systematic (non-Poisson)
    errors (in this order) short-time source
    morphology, validity of model assumption
    B(x,t)Srk(t)Bk(x) lifetime, aspect solution
    higher harmonics GRM data ...
  • Phoenix calibration by Pascal StHilaires basic
    method. Good absolute Phoenix timing (GPS).
  • Light travel time RHESSI/Phoenix lt RE/c20ms
  • By-eye association of individual peaks gives
    similar average delay as cross-correlation of the
    full time series.
  • No indication for center-to-limb increase of
    radio delay found, but sample is small.
  • If we dare a physics speculation perhaps, the
    electrons are draged out of a collisional
    population, so that HXR arises on the way to
    high energies. So HXR could mark the (low)
    acceleration site, and (normally drifting type
    III) radio traces the outward esacping beams. But
    0.4s gtgt tcoll, chrom.

32
(No Transcript)
33
_________________________________________ Results
(7b)
34
_____________________________ Demodulation
Examples (1)
Error bars perturb solution until log L drops
by unity.
35
A problem case
Attenuator in
Oscillations indicate that fit is impossible
probably I treat the attenuated grid transmission
a0 incorrectly...
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
HXR leads radio type III onset by typically 0.5s
100 MHz
PHOENIX-2 Intensity
4 GHz
RHESSI
Visibility-based demodulation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com