Title: Jaromr indel
1Optimal Currency Area
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
2Topics
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
- Optimal Currency Area
- Theory, indices, ...
- Euro-area OCA?
- Italian case,
- CEE countries and EU OCA?
- Are CEE countries OCA with Euro-area?
3Exchange rate regime classification
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
- Floating rate regimes
- Floating rate with inflation targeting
- Managed exchange rates without explicit targets
(dirty float) - Pure floating rates No CB intervention
- Fixed-rate regimes
- Soft pegs Explicit targets without full monetary
adjustment - Exchange rate bands and target zones
- Crawling pegs, corridors, and tabilias
- Use of sterilized intervention
- Hard pegs Full use of automatic monetary
adjustment - Currency unions
- Dollarization
- Currency boards
4Exchange rate regime classification
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
Source Holub, T. Foreign Exchange Interventions
Under Inflation Targeting The Czech Experience.
CNB (2004).
5Review of the OCA theory
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
- Friedman (1953) - view on floating ER
- Mundell (1961) - his model of an asymmetric
shift in demand of two countries stressed that
optimum currency area can differ form the actual
currency area and offered some non-exchange rates
means for adjustment as labour mobility, nominal
flexibility and fiscal transfers - McKinnon (1963), Kenen (1969), Ingram (In
Kawai, 1987) extended the list of non-exchange
rates means for adjustment (financial
integration, openness and national product
diversification) - McKinnon (2000) - presents a neo-Keynesian
model (elimination of the effect of shocks by
national monetary and fiscal policies downward
sloping and stable Phillips curve) - Mundell (1973a, 1973b) - which bring completely
different argumentation concerning the optimum
currency area - others Frankel and Rose (1998 a, b), Krugman
(1993), De Grauwe (1997), Rodrick (2000), Fidrmuc
(2001), etc.
Source Komárek
6Currency unions
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
Source Komárek
7Currency unions
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
Source Komárek
8Currency unions
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
Source Komárek
9Review of the OCA theory
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
- Advantages of currency union
- Lower transaction costs reducing ER uncertainty
- lower ER risk (FRA is expensive within high
volatil currency expensive for small producers) - Transparency of prices higher competition
- Higher gains to trade Rose (increase in foreign
trade) - for example risk-averse producers involve in
foreign trade - Nominal archor for higher inflation coutries
lower inflation as result - Disadvantages
- Loss of independent monetary policy (compare with
dichotomy of MP) - Decreased flexibility in reacting to external
shocks
10Review of the OCA theory
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
- Benefits outweigh costs if
- Markets are highly integrated
- Goods markets, Financial markets, Labor markets
- Shocks to currency union members are symmetrical
(UK - oil) - Labor markets are flexible
- Flexible fiscal policy for fiscal transfers (to
cope with shocks) - Question of OCA endogenity
- Convergence to OCA and higher flexibility follow
integration process
Source Prof. E. Dolan, Lecture at VSE Prague,
2005.
11Review of the OCA theory
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
Symmetry of shocks and Integration
Try to draw in the possible currency union
between the USA and Canada.
Source Prof. E. Dolan, Lecture at VSE Prague,
2005.
12Review of the OCA theory
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
Specialization vs. intra-industry trade
Frankel and Rose (1997) - Integration increases
intra-industry trade what caused business cycle
convergence
Krugman (1993) - Economies of scale integration
increases trade specialization what caused
asymmetric shocks
Source Komárek (CNB).
13Common Currency interest group forming
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
The possible preferences of economic sectors to
national monetary policy
Source Frieden, J. (1991), p. 445
14Maastricht convergence criteria and OCA theory
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
- Ignored OCA theorys micro factors
- Emphasized macro factors
- Desire to ensure same cyclical position
- inflation not only factor
- Low inflation countries wanted guarantee of
fiscal restraint (compare with nowdays situation
in Germany)
15Euro-area OCA? Italian case
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
Source Prof. E. Dolan, Lecture at VSE Prague,
2005.
16Euro-area OCA? Italian case
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
Source Prof. E. Dolan, Lecture at VSE Prague,
2005.
17Euro-area OCA? Italian case
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
Increase of foreign savings for financing Italian
economy
Source Prof. E. Dolan, Lecture at VSE Prague,
2005.
18Euro-area OCA? Italian case
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
- What about OCA?
- Integration, flexibility, symmetry of shocks,
fiscal flexibility - Italy and Euro-area OCA?
- Integration
- About 60 of Italys trade is with EU partners
Comparisions - France63 and Belgium73 - Much better integrated than Argentina vs. US
- Some barriers to financial market integration,
e.g., banking - Labor mobility is low
19Euro-area OCA? Italian case
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
and high fiscal indebtedness
but debt will growth D deficit/(qp)
yield from integration. Without integration, no
cheap indebtedness.
Source Prof. E. Dolan, Lecture at VSE Prague,
2005.
20Euro-area OCA? Italian case
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
- Labor mobility is low and high ridigity at labor
market
very low flexibility in the world comparison
dangerous high union coverage (in addition
political active) and low employerscoordination
Source Prof. E. Dolan, Lecture at VSE Prague,
2005.
21Euro-area OCA? Italian case
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
- Why flexibility? Shocks? Asymmetry? ???
very low flexibility at labor market bring
longer recovery to structural shock low
correlation within real demand shock
Source Prof. E. Dolan, Lecture at VSE Prague,
2005.
22Italy and leaving EURO solution?
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
- YES
- RER and competitiveness it can also enhanced
fiscal consolodition which brings easier
monetary policy - Yes, it will bring quick recovery
- NO it is more realistic
- High indebtedness (increase interest rate for
Italian debt risk premia expected devaulation
of new lira) - Politicians are weak x Unions strong (strikes)
no fiscal consolidation, no labor market reforms - Higher inflation environment to reduce debt
23Message from Italy for CEE countries
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
- Labor market Finish reforms before entry
- Fiscal policy
- Long-term fiscal sustainability should be
achieved for fiscal flexibility - One-off measures to meet entry conditions is not
enough - Exchange rate Entry rate should be fundamental
or realistic (adjustment of RER after entry is
difficult) - NER (common NER), ULC (labor market and
productivity), price differentials (compare with
price convergence)
24CEE countries and EA OCA?
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
GDP development (year on year changes)
Source CNB, 2005.
25CEE countries and EA OCA?
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
Correlation of economic activity (1 y/y, 2- q/q,
3 HP filter)
Source CNB, 2005.
26CEE countries and EA OCA?
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
Shock symmetry with euro-area
Source Prof. E. Dolan, Lecture at VSE Prague,
2005.
27CEE countries and EA OCA?
The Puzzles of Central and Eastern Europe
Transformation and Integration
ECES, Prague
Structural similarity (lower higher similarity)
Source CNB, 2005.