A Model for Characterizing Total Interference in Heterogeneous Cellular CDMA

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

A Model for Characterizing Total Interference in Heterogeneous Cellular CDMA

Description:

Network dynamics, is due to the variation of traffic load in adjacent cell ... 32kbps data (Eb/I0=3dB), Pareto 1 = 1.5, E 1 = 2, Fixed bit rate ... –

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: commTo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Model for Characterizing Total Interference in Heterogeneous Cellular CDMA


1
A Model for Characterizing Total Interference in
Heterogeneous Cellular CDMA
  • Keivan Navaie
  • April 2003

2
Outline
  • Overview
  • Downlink interference modeling
  • Effect of traffic characteristics on total
    interference
  • Analytical and simulation results
  • Analysis and discussion
  • Applications
  • Conclusion

3
Overview
  • Third generation cellular networks will support
    multimedia and data applications
  • CDMA seems to be the next generation physical
    layer technology
  • CDMA performance is interference limited
  • Interference management is a crucial topic in
    wireless cellular CDMA systems

4
Downlink Interference
  • Data traffic is asymmetric, therefore downlink
    interference can be a performance bottleneck
  • Asymmetric application require to transmit more
    data on the downlink than that of transmit on the
    uplink

5
Effect of Dynamics
  • Both the user and the network dynamics affect the
    total interference in a cell
  • Network dynamics, is due to the variation of
    traffic load in adjacent cell
  • User dynamics include, the moving pattern, the
    channel variations, and the traffic
    characteristics
  • It has been shown that air interface dynamics
    could improve network performance
  • Users mobility and channel fading Tse01
  • Water filling Holtz00,01
  • Opportunistic scheduling Liu01

6
Total Downlink Interference Modeling
  • To study the variations in the downlink
    interference, we characterize total interference
    in the downlink as a stochastic process
  • Time scale for modeling
  • We exploit total interference structure at the
    same time scale, when rate control and the
    admission control decisions are made

7
Where are we?
Call admission control Load control Congestion
control
Traffic characteristics
Fast power control Rate control
Channel variations
8
Downlink Total Interference Process
  • I(n) is a discrete time series, corresponding to
    the value of the total interference in a window
    of length Tc
  • Time resolution is Tc , Tplt Tc ltltTf
  • Total interference is
  • ?c(n) is the channel gain, and Pc(n) is the base
    station total transmit power

9
Base Station Total Transmit Power
  • Transmit power of the base station c is
  • Each call is described by
  • A call start time ? cij
  • J service types

10
Effect of Users Traffic
  • Number of interferers
  • (Call arrival statistics)
  • Period of contribution of each call
  • (Call duration statistics)
  • Variations in call durations
  • (Bit rate statistics)

11
How Traffic Characteristics are Modeled?
  • What is the approach for modeling of voice
    traffic?
  • Is this approach valid for multimedia and data
    traffic?

12
Traffic Modeling in Wireline Poisson Approach
  • Traffic modeling in the world of telephony is
    based on two basic assumptions
  • Poisson arrival process
  • Poisson call duration
  • These assumptions have enabled very successful
    engineering of telephone networks

13
Traffic Modeling in Wireline non-Poisson Approach
  • It has been shown that the Poisson models cannot
    accurately characterize
  • Poisson assumptions are not valid
  • Aggregate traffic trace
  • LAN and WAN traffic Paxon, Willinger
  • Individual traffic Source
  • Source model Digital video traffic Beran
  • Source model Web traffic Crovella

14
Example of non-Poisson Call duration Heavy-tail
distribution
  • Pareto type call duration
  • P?kL(k)k-(?1)

15
Poisson Traffic in Wireless
  • Poisson models have been used to model the users
    traffic effect on the total interference vit93
    everit95
  • This results in the interference to be a Poisson
    process
  • The effect of non-Poisson traffic on the
    network's performance was first pointed out in
    Quraishi97

16
Non-Poisson Traffic in Wireless
  • The non-Poisson long range dependent (LRD)
    traffic and its impact on teletraffic efficiency
    of CDMA system have also been studied in Tsyb98
  • In Zhang02, it is stated that the total
    interference in a packet based wireless network
    with bursty data traffic is self-similar. The
    self similar model is used to develop a scheme
    that performs rate and admission control.

17
Effect of Traffic Characteristic on the Total
Interference Statistics
  • Theorem
  • Suppose the EI(n) lt ? and Tf / Tc gtgt1 , we
    define
  • as follow
  • Then I(n) is as-s if, ?!c such that
  • Therefore H1-?/2 and ? min?c.

18
  • Timescale of the modeling (Tc) is such that
    relative channel variation is slow.
  • Point of modeling is actually between inner and
    outer loop power control
  • It is sufficient to be at least one
    non-Poisson traffic for I(n) to be self-similar

19
Call Duration Effect
  • Assuming, Tf/Tc gtgt1 and a constant bit rate
    traffic in the call duration, then
  • For voice only network
  • Total interference I(n) will be short
    range dependent (H0.5)
  • For mixed voice and heavy tail traffic
  • Total interference I(n) will be long
    range dependent with
  • (1/2ltHlt1)

20
Fading and Time Scale Effect
  • Assuming Constant bit rate traffic in the call
    duration, then
  • For voice only network
  • Total interference I(n) will be short range
    dependent H0.5
  • For mixed voice and heavy tail traffic
  • Total interference I(n) will be long range
    dependent with 1/2ltHlt1 if slow fading, and Tf/Tc
    gtgt1
  • Otherwise is short range dependent

21
Intuitions about Downlink Interference
Self-similarity
  • Self similarity indicates that there are exist
    extended periods of either strong or weak
    interference
  • Periods of high level interference cause the
    quality of service to be degraded
  • Also, the existence of periods of light
    interference level, results in network
    under-utilization

22
Simulation Environment
  • We have considered a two tire hexagonal cell
    configuration, along with a wrap around technique
  • Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS)
  • 1500/s fast power control
  • 12.2 kbps voice (Eb/I05dB), Poisson 5 Erlangs
  • 32kbps data (Eb/I03dB), Pareto ?1 1.5, E?1
    2, Fixed bit rate
  • 64kbps data (Eb/I02dB), Pareto ?2 1.8, E?2
    1.5, Fixed bit rate
  • Tc10 ms
  • Slow fading with ?c8dB and Tf100ms
  • Uniform spatial distribution
  • Theoretically H0.75

23
Simulations Results Total interference
24
Simulations Results Total Interference (contd)
25
Simulations Results Fading Effect
26
Discussion of Results
  • In the heterogeneous CDMA network, (with certain
    conditions on the channel and traffic
    characteristics) total interference is
    self-similar
  • We showed that, this can be occurred within
    actual network configurations
  • The characteristics of self similar process could
    potentially affect the services that require
    tight QoS requirements
  • Q How can we use total interference behavior to
    improve system performance?

27
Discussion of Results (contd)
  • Self-similarity implies the existence of a
    nontrivial predictive structure
  • This structure can be exploited for interference
    management, and system performance improvement

28
An ApplicationNon-real time data scheduling
29
Total Downlink Interference
30
System specifications
  • Non-real time data in presence of the background
    services
  • Background services voice and multimedia, and
    connection oriented data
  • Users predict the value of total interference in
    the next control window using a linear predictor
  • Self-similarity in the interference is modeled as
    a fGn process
  • fGn is a Gaussian Self-similar process which can
    be specified by H, variance and mean

31
Scenario
Evaluating the total available power for non-real
time users
Non-real time traffic scheduling
User predicts the value of received interference
32
Scheduling
  • In each control period Tc, we use time domain
    scheduling
  • It is shown that this scheme is throughput
    optimal
  • Simulation results also show that this simple has
    bigger admission region

33
Simulation results Admission region
34
Conclusion
  • Traffic characteristics affect total interference
  • We derived the condition on channel and traffic
    characteristics that cause the total interference
    be as-s
  • This characteristic affect the applications with
    tight QoS requirements
  • These characteristics can be used for
    multiservice system to improve total system
    throughput

35
A.1 Channel Model
  • Distance related attenuation (d-?) along with
    log- normal slow-shadowing
  • Gudmunsons slow fading model with standard
    deviation ? and frequency 1/Tf
  • ?(n) is a zero mean WGN with variance
    ?2(1?)/(1-?)
  • Denote

36
A.2 Outage Characteristics
  • It is shown that for Markovian aggregate process
    the overflow asymptotical is
  • This change to the following for the case of the
    LRD process

37
A.3 Optimal Linear Prediction
  • A self-similar process with given H can be
    parsimoniously represented by a fGn process
  • For fGn covariance is for k?Z,
  • So the optimal ?-step linear predictor with M tap
    is

38
A.4 Self-Similarity The Mathematics
  • Self-similarity manifests itself in several
    equivalent fashions such as
  • Slowly decaying variance
  • The variance of the sample decreases more slowly
    than the reciprocal of the sample size
  • For most processes, the variance of a sample
    diminishes quite rapidly as the sample size is
    increased, and stabilizes soon
  • For self-similar processes, the variance
    decreases very slowly, even when the sample size
    grows quite large
  • Long range dependence
  • For most processes (e.g., Poisson, or compound
    Poisson), the autocorrelation function drops to
    zero very quickly (usually immediately, or
    exponentially fast)
  • For self-similar processes, the autocorrelation
    function drops very slowly (i.e., hyperbolically)
    toward zero, but may never reach zero
  • Non-summable autocorrelation function

39
Autocorrelation Function
1
Typical long-range dependent process
0
Autocorrelation Coefficient
Typical short-range dependent process
-1
lag k
0
100
40
A.4 Simulation Results Delay Performance
41
A.5 Time Efficiency
42
A.6 Overview (contd)
  • Interference management
  • _at_ frame level Power and rate control
  • _at_ call level Call admissions and load control
  • Multiservice CDMA has to support different
    service types each having complicated traffic and
    QoS characteristics

?Multi-Service vs. voice-only network
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com