Title: A Model for Characterizing Total Interference in Heterogeneous Cellular CDMA
1A Model for Characterizing Total Interference in
Heterogeneous Cellular CDMA
2Outline
- Overview
- Downlink interference modeling
- Effect of traffic characteristics on total
interference - Analytical and simulation results
- Analysis and discussion
- Applications
- Conclusion
3Overview
- Third generation cellular networks will support
multimedia and data applications - CDMA seems to be the next generation physical
layer technology - CDMA performance is interference limited
- Interference management is a crucial topic in
wireless cellular CDMA systems
4Downlink Interference
- Data traffic is asymmetric, therefore downlink
interference can be a performance bottleneck - Asymmetric application require to transmit more
data on the downlink than that of transmit on the
uplink
5Effect of Dynamics
- Both the user and the network dynamics affect the
total interference in a cell - Network dynamics, is due to the variation of
traffic load in adjacent cell - User dynamics include, the moving pattern, the
channel variations, and the traffic
characteristics - It has been shown that air interface dynamics
could improve network performance - Users mobility and channel fading Tse01
- Water filling Holtz00,01
- Opportunistic scheduling Liu01
6Total Downlink Interference Modeling
- To study the variations in the downlink
interference, we characterize total interference
in the downlink as a stochastic process - Time scale for modeling
- We exploit total interference structure at the
same time scale, when rate control and the
admission control decisions are made
7Where are we?
Call admission control Load control Congestion
control
Traffic characteristics
Fast power control Rate control
Channel variations
8Downlink Total Interference Process
- I(n) is a discrete time series, corresponding to
the value of the total interference in a window
of length Tc - Time resolution is Tc , Tplt Tc ltltTf
- Total interference is
- ?c(n) is the channel gain, and Pc(n) is the base
station total transmit power
9Base Station Total Transmit Power
- Transmit power of the base station c is
- Each call is described by
- A call start time ? cij
- J service types
10Effect of Users Traffic
- Number of interferers
- (Call arrival statistics)
- Period of contribution of each call
- (Call duration statistics)
- Variations in call durations
- (Bit rate statistics)
11How Traffic Characteristics are Modeled?
- What is the approach for modeling of voice
traffic? - Is this approach valid for multimedia and data
traffic?
12Traffic Modeling in Wireline Poisson Approach
- Traffic modeling in the world of telephony is
based on two basic assumptions - Poisson arrival process
- Poisson call duration
- These assumptions have enabled very successful
engineering of telephone networks
13Traffic Modeling in Wireline non-Poisson Approach
- It has been shown that the Poisson models cannot
accurately characterize - Poisson assumptions are not valid
- Aggregate traffic trace
- LAN and WAN traffic Paxon, Willinger
- Individual traffic Source
- Source model Digital video traffic Beran
- Source model Web traffic Crovella
14Example of non-Poisson Call duration Heavy-tail
distribution
- Pareto type call duration
- P?kL(k)k-(?1)
15Poisson Traffic in Wireless
- Poisson models have been used to model the users
traffic effect on the total interference vit93
everit95 - This results in the interference to be a Poisson
process - The effect of non-Poisson traffic on the
network's performance was first pointed out in
Quraishi97
16Non-Poisson Traffic in Wireless
- The non-Poisson long range dependent (LRD)
traffic and its impact on teletraffic efficiency
of CDMA system have also been studied in Tsyb98 - In Zhang02, it is stated that the total
interference in a packet based wireless network
with bursty data traffic is self-similar. The
self similar model is used to develop a scheme
that performs rate and admission control.
17Effect of Traffic Characteristic on the Total
Interference Statistics
- Theorem
- Suppose the EI(n) lt ? and Tf / Tc gtgt1 , we
define - as follow
- Then I(n) is as-s if, ?!c such that
- Therefore H1-?/2 and ? min?c.
18- Timescale of the modeling (Tc) is such that
relative channel variation is slow. - Point of modeling is actually between inner and
outer loop power control - It is sufficient to be at least one
non-Poisson traffic for I(n) to be self-similar
19Call Duration Effect
- Assuming, Tf/Tc gtgt1 and a constant bit rate
traffic in the call duration, then
- For voice only network
- Total interference I(n) will be short
range dependent (H0.5)
- For mixed voice and heavy tail traffic
- Total interference I(n) will be long
range dependent with - (1/2ltHlt1)
20Fading and Time Scale Effect
- Assuming Constant bit rate traffic in the call
duration, then
- For voice only network
- Total interference I(n) will be short range
dependent H0.5
- For mixed voice and heavy tail traffic
- Total interference I(n) will be long range
dependent with 1/2ltHlt1 if slow fading, and Tf/Tc
gtgt1 - Otherwise is short range dependent
21Intuitions about Downlink Interference
Self-similarity
- Self similarity indicates that there are exist
extended periods of either strong or weak
interference - Periods of high level interference cause the
quality of service to be degraded - Also, the existence of periods of light
interference level, results in network
under-utilization
22Simulation Environment
- We have considered a two tire hexagonal cell
configuration, along with a wrap around technique
- Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS)
- 1500/s fast power control
- 12.2 kbps voice (Eb/I05dB), Poisson 5 Erlangs
- 32kbps data (Eb/I03dB), Pareto ?1 1.5, E?1
2, Fixed bit rate - 64kbps data (Eb/I02dB), Pareto ?2 1.8, E?2
1.5, Fixed bit rate - Tc10 ms
- Slow fading with ?c8dB and Tf100ms
- Uniform spatial distribution
- Theoretically H0.75
23 Simulations Results Total interference
24Simulations Results Total Interference (contd)
25Simulations Results Fading Effect
26Discussion of Results
- In the heterogeneous CDMA network, (with certain
conditions on the channel and traffic
characteristics) total interference is
self-similar - We showed that, this can be occurred within
actual network configurations - The characteristics of self similar process could
potentially affect the services that require
tight QoS requirements
- Q How can we use total interference behavior to
improve system performance?
27Discussion of Results (contd)
- Self-similarity implies the existence of a
nontrivial predictive structure - This structure can be exploited for interference
management, and system performance improvement
28An ApplicationNon-real time data scheduling
29 Total Downlink Interference
30System specifications
- Non-real time data in presence of the background
services - Background services voice and multimedia, and
connection oriented data - Users predict the value of total interference in
the next control window using a linear predictor - Self-similarity in the interference is modeled as
a fGn process - fGn is a Gaussian Self-similar process which can
be specified by H, variance and mean
31Scenario
Evaluating the total available power for non-real
time users
Non-real time traffic scheduling
User predicts the value of received interference
32Scheduling
- In each control period Tc, we use time domain
scheduling - It is shown that this scheme is throughput
optimal - Simulation results also show that this simple has
bigger admission region
33Simulation results Admission region
34Conclusion
- Traffic characteristics affect total interference
- We derived the condition on channel and traffic
characteristics that cause the total interference
be as-s - This characteristic affect the applications with
tight QoS requirements - These characteristics can be used for
multiservice system to improve total system
throughput
35A.1 Channel Model
- Distance related attenuation (d-?) along with
log- normal slow-shadowing - Gudmunsons slow fading model with standard
deviation ? and frequency 1/Tf - ?(n) is a zero mean WGN with variance
?2(1?)/(1-?) - Denote
36A.2 Outage Characteristics
- It is shown that for Markovian aggregate process
the overflow asymptotical is - This change to the following for the case of the
LRD process
37A.3 Optimal Linear Prediction
- A self-similar process with given H can be
parsimoniously represented by a fGn process - For fGn covariance is for k?Z,
- So the optimal ?-step linear predictor with M tap
is
38A.4 Self-Similarity The Mathematics
- Self-similarity manifests itself in several
equivalent fashions such as - Slowly decaying variance
- The variance of the sample decreases more slowly
than the reciprocal of the sample size - For most processes, the variance of a sample
diminishes quite rapidly as the sample size is
increased, and stabilizes soon - For self-similar processes, the variance
decreases very slowly, even when the sample size
grows quite large - Long range dependence
- For most processes (e.g., Poisson, or compound
Poisson), the autocorrelation function drops to
zero very quickly (usually immediately, or
exponentially fast) - For self-similar processes, the autocorrelation
function drops very slowly (i.e., hyperbolically)
toward zero, but may never reach zero - Non-summable autocorrelation function
39Autocorrelation Function
1
Typical long-range dependent process
0
Autocorrelation Coefficient
Typical short-range dependent process
-1
lag k
0
100
40A.4 Simulation Results Delay Performance
41A.5 Time Efficiency
42A.6 Overview (contd)
- Interference management
- _at_ frame level Power and rate control
- _at_ call level Call admissions and load control
- Multiservice CDMA has to support different
service types each having complicated traffic and
QoS characteristics
?Multi-Service vs. voice-only network