Engine of Growth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Engine of Growth

Description:

... gA=(ln/1-f) long run growth rate of this ... Setting f 1, however, eliminates the long run growth effect of policy as well. ... (2) 'Stepping on toes' effect. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: nsola
Category:
Tags: engine | growth | long | toes

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Engine of Growth


1
Engine of Growth
  • ECON 401 Growth Theory

2
Engine of Growth
  • Objective develop an explicit theory of
    technological progress and answer the questions
  • Where does the technological progress come from?
  • Can we expect the growth to continue?
  • Is there a limit to economic growth?
  • The theories that tries to answer these questions
    are known as endogenous growth theory or new
    growth theory.

3
Engine of Growth
  • Basic Elements Model is designed to explain why
    and how the advanced countries sustained growth
  • We will introduce search for new ideas to
    endogenize technological progress
  • Technological progress is driven by RD
  • Production function is given by
  • YKa(ALY)1-a (5.1)
  • Where K is capital stock, LY is labor, and A is
    the stock of ideas.

4
Engine of Growth
  • For a given level of technology, this production
    function exhibits constant returns to scale in K
    and L.
  • ? It must exhibit increasing returns with
    respect to all three inputs.
  • Capital accumulation is given by

Labor and population grows at a constant rate of
n.
5
Engine of Growth
  • A(t) is the stock of knowledge or the number of
    ideas that have been invented until time t.
    Change in A, then , will be determined by the
    number of people working to discover new ideas,
    LA, and the rate at which they discover new ideas.

Rate of discovering new ideas might - be a
constant, or - might depend on the stock of
ideas - it might be an increasing function of A
if the level of A positively impacts productivity
of researcher - it might be a decreasing
function of A if the obvious ideas are discovered
first, leaving the most difficult ones
6
Engine of Growth
  • Hence, we can model
  • What does it tell us if fgt0?
  • indicates that productivity of research increases
    with the stock of ideas.
  • flt0? f0?
  • It is also possible that average productivity of
    research depends on the number of people
    searching for new ideas at any point in time
    (duplication).
  • ? LAg , where 0ltglt1, should enter the production
    function and not LA.

7
Engine of Growth
  • General production function for ideas
  • We will assume flt1. Individual researchers take
    the discovery rate of new ideas as given and see
    constant returns to research. However, for the
    economy as a whole, production function for ideas
    may not be characterized by constant returns to
    scale.
  • Allocation of resources
  • Constant fraction of output is invested in
    capital
  • Allocation of labor between output production
    and idea production is determined by utility
    maximization and markets.
  • LALYL
  • However, we will assume a constant fraction
    sRLA/L
  • We assume economy starts out with K0 and L0, and
    A0.

8
Engine of Growth
  • Growth In Romer Model
  • Per capita growth is due to technological
    progress
  • Balanced growth path has
  • gy gk gA
  • What is the rate of technological progress along
    a balanced growth path?
  • Rewrite the production function for ideas as
  • Growth rate of A is gA along a balanced growth
    path.
  • happens if both numerator and denominator grows
    at the same rate
  • ? Along a balanced growth path, growth rate of
    number of researchers must be equal to the growth
    rate of population.

9
Engine of Growth
  • If the growth rate of researchers is higher, the
    number of researchers would eventually exceed the
    population which is impossible.
  • Solving for gA gA(ln/1-f) long run growth
    rate of this economy is determined by the
    parameters of the production function for ideas
    and the rate of growth of researchers (or
    population)
  • What if l1 and f0?
  • Productivity of researcher is constant
  • No duplication problem
  • Production function looks like
  • Economy generates a constant number of new ideas
    each period. Over time, this constant number
    becomes a smaller fraction of A. Hence, growth
    rate of new ideas falls over time, approaching to
    zero. However, technological progress never
    ceases.

10
Engine of Growth
  • To generate exponential growth number of ideas
    must be expanding over time ? number of
    researchers is increasing. So growth of ideas is
    clearly related to growth in population
  • How is this different from Neoclassical model?
  • In neo-classical model, higher n reduces level of
    income along a balanced growth path
  • Here, an additional effect input to creative
    process ? ideas are non-rivalrous and hence
    everybody benefits
  • Do we expect long-run growth to cease if the
    population stops growing?

11
Engine of Growth
  • Special case If l1 and f1 we can have
    sustained growth in the presence of a constant
    research effort. In this case, productivity of
    researcher is proportional to the existing stock
    of ideas.
  • Drawback World research effort has increased
    enormously over the last 40 years, but the growth
    rate of advanced economies did not rise as
    predicted by the Romer model.
  • - So we can reject f1 (knowledge spillover
    parameter) is rejected by this evidence. It can
    be positive and large but less than 1.
  • As in neoclassical model, changes in government
    policy and changes in investment rate do not have
    long-run effect on growth rate.

12
Engine of Growth
  • The idea-based models in which changes in policy
    can permanently increase the growth rate all rely
    on the assumption that f1. But this generates a
    counterfactual prediction. Setting flt1, however,
    eliminates the long run growth effect of policy
    as well.
  • What happens if the share of population searching
    for ideas increase permanently?
  • (1) Consider the effect on technological progress
    and on stock of ideas
  • (2) Analyze the model
  • To simplify, assume l1 and f0. Figure 5.1 shows
    what happens to technological progress when sR
    increases.

13
Fig. 5.1
14
Engine of Growth
  • A permanent increase in the share of the
    population devoted to research raises the rate of
    technological progress temporarily, but not in
    the long run.
  • Figure 5.2.
  • What happend to the level of technology? Figure
    5.3.
  • - The level of technology is permamnently higher
    as a result of the permanent increase in RD.

15
Fig. 5.2
16
Fig. 5.3
17
Engine of Growth
  • Along a balanced growth path,
  • - Per capita output is proportional to the
    population of the world economy along a balanced
    growth path. That is, model has a scale effect
    larger world economy will be a richer worl
    economy ? nonrivalrous nature of ideas ? larger
    market for an idea and larger potential creators
    of ideas
  • Economies that invest more will be richer
  • Share of labor devoted to research has two
    effects
  • More researchers mean fewer workers producing
    output
  • More researchers mean more ideas

18
Engine of Growth
  • Economis of the Model
  • Romer economy has
  • a final goods sector
  • produce output
  • an intermediate goods sector
  • Reason presence of increasing returns to scale
  • a research sector
  • produce ideas
  • Research sector creates new ideas, which take the
    form of new varieties of capital goods. Research
    sector sells the exclusive right to produce a
    specific capital good to an intermediate goods
    firm. The intermediate goods firm, as a
    monopolist, manufactures the capital good and
    sells it to the final goods sector.

19
Engine of Growth
  • Final Goods Sector
  • Large number of perfectly competitive firms
  • Uses capital and labor to produce final output Y
  • Final output is produced using labor and a
    number of different capital goods (intermediate
    goods)

A measures the number of capital goods that are
available to be used in the final goods sector.
For a given A, production function exhibits
constant returns to scale. Firms decide on how
much labor and how much of each capital good to
use in producing final good by solving the profit
maximization problem.
20
Engine of Growth
  • Firms hire labor until marginal product of labor
    equals wage.
  • Firms rent capital goods until the marginal
    product of each kind of capital equals the rental
    price.
  • Intermediate-goods Sector
  • Consists of monopolists. They gain their monopoly
    power by purchasing the design for a specific
    capital good. Because of patent protection, only
    one firm manufactures each capital good.
  • Simple production function one unit of raw
    capital can be automatically translated into one
    unit of capital good.
  • Firm charges a price that is simply a markup over
    marginal cost. All capital goods sell for the
    same price and hence each capital good is
    employed by the final goods sector by the same
    amount. Each capital goods firm earn the same
    profit.

21
Engine of Growth
  • Research Sector
  • Ideas are new designs for capital goods (e.g., a
    faster computer chip)
  • Inventor receives a patent for a new design
    (patent lasts forever). Inventor sells the patent
    to an intermediate goods firm and uses the
    proceeds to consume and save.
  • How much will a potential bidder pay for the
    patent?
  • Present discounted value of the profits to be
    earned by an intermediate goods firm.

22
Engine of Growth
  • Solving the Model
  • Remember
  • Aggregate production function exhibits increasing
    returns to scale
  • Increasing returns require imperfect competition.
  • Capital goods sell at a price that is greater
    than marginal cost
  • Profits earned by these firms are extracted by
    the inventors
  • This framework is called monopolistic competition
  • (no economic profits in the model).
  • Because of arbitrage, individuals are indifferent
    between working in the final goods sector or in
    the research sector.

23
Engine of Growth
  • Labor earns a wage that is equal to marginal
    product in that sector.
  • Researchers earn a wage based on the value of the
    designs they discover marginal productvalue of
    the new ideas created.
  • ? Because of arbitrage, these wages has to be
    equal.
  • The share of the population that works in the
    research sector is (after some algebra)

Note that faster the economy grows, the higher
the fraction of the population that works in
research. The higher the discount rates that
applies to current profits to get the present
discounted value (r-n), the lower theis fraction.
24
Engine of Growth
  • Interest rate in this economy is less than the
    marginal product of capital.
  • How is this different from Solow model?
  • In the Romer model, production in the economy is
    characterized by increasing returns and all
    factors cannot be paid their marginal products.
  • In Solow, rKwLY all factors are paid their
    marginal product no output remains to
    compensate individuals for their effort in
    creating new A. In this model, capital is paid
    less than its marginal product, and the remainder
    is used to compensate researchers for creation of
    new ideas.

25
Engine of Growth
  • Optimal RD
  • Is the share of the population that works in
    research optimal?
  • Three distortions
  • (1) Market values research according to the
    stream of profits that are earned from the new
    design
  • - ignores the impact of new invention on the
    productivity of future research. Hence,
    researchers are not compensated for this effect.
    This distortion is often called knowledge
    spillover.
  • (2) Stepping on toes effect. Researchers do not
    take into account the lower research productivity
    through duplication.

26
Engine of Growth
  • (3) Consumer surplus effect. Figure 5.4.
    Potential gain to society is larger than the
    monopoly profit and hence too little innovation
    is generated.
  • In general, these distortions can be very large.
    Consider the cure for malaria or cholera
    consumer surplus and thge knowledge spillovers
    has to be large - governments fund research in
    general.
  • Empirically, positive externality of research
    outweigh the negative externalities, social rate
    of return far exceeds the private rate of return
    market tend to produce too little innovation.
  • Classical economic theory argues that monopolies
    (or PgtMC) are bad for welfare and efficiency
    (deadweight losses). However, economics of ideas
    suggest that it is critical for firms to set
    their prices above MC for innovation.

27
Fig. 5.4
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com