A UniverseDefined System of Arithmetic Achievement Items Hively, Patterson, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

A UniverseDefined System of Arithmetic Achievement Items Hively, Patterson,

Description:

... a theory which may have very little to do with how people actually behave' (pp. 287-288) ... Ones with fixed or constrained values all tasks must have ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: bobmi9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A UniverseDefined System of Arithmetic Achievement Items Hively, Patterson,


1
A Universe-Defined System of Arithmetic
Achievement Items (Hively, Patterson, Page,
1968)
  • Robert J. Mislevy
  • University of Maryland
  • April 10, 2002

2
Psychological Perspective
  • Written from an unabashedly behavioristic
    perspective.
  • A thorough analysis of behavior is capable of
    yielding more than a long list of examples
    (p.276)
  • What the organism has may be operationally
    defined as a functional relationship between
    certain classes of stimuli and classes of
    responses (p. 276)
  • Classes of stimuli may be defined by stating
    sets of relevant and irrelevant properties
    (p.276) s
  • Diagnose organisms discriminative repertoire

3
Recall Messicks Guiding Questions
  • What complex of knowledge, skills, or other
    attributes should be assessed, presumably because
    they are tied to explicit or implicit objectives
    of instruction or are otherwise valued by
    society?
  • What behaviors or performances should reveal
    those constructs?
  • What tasks or situations should elicit those
    behaviors?
  • (Messick, 1994)

4
Examples from the Subtraction Universe
(Hively, Patterson, Page, 1968, p. 281)
5
More on Hively et al.
  • A hierarchy of forms based on TM variables
    constitutes a crude theory of the psychological
    structure of the subject matter -- a theory which
    may have very little to do with how people
    actually behave (pp. 287-288)
  • No necessary connection with instructional
    theory.
  • Work product per item,is right/wrong. Compare
    with VanLehns Mind Bugs.

6
Hivelys Item Forms are partial Task Models
  • Argument back to why situations with those
    properties evoke behavior that evidence target
    skill/knowledge. YES
  • Stimulus material specs. ALMOST
  • Conditions for examinee interaction (rules,
    tools, context, instructions). NOT PART OF FORM
  • Task-model variables. YES
  • Ones with fixed or constrained values all tasks
    must have
  • Ones that can vary, and affect evidentiary focus
    or difficulty
  • One that can vary, and are incidental to the
    skills meant to be evoked
  • Work product specs. NO
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com